Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 9(7): 2638-2641, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744471

RESUMEN

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) became aware of postmarketing reports of neuropsychiatric adverse events with Singulair (montelukast) use in 2007. Over the years, the FDA has conducted reviews of the clinical trial safety data, focused analyses of postmarketing reports, and reviews of the published literature. These activities have resulted in successive labeling updates and public communications. However, there has been continued concern among stakeholders about the risk of neuropsychiatric events and the lack of awareness among prescribers and patients/caregivers. On the basis of these concerns, the FDA embarked on another comprehensive review and also conducted a new observational study using claims data in the Sentinel Distributed Database. In September 2019, the FDA held a public Advisory Committee meeting to discuss its review and solicit recommendations from the panel regarding labeling and communication strategies. After careful consideration of the available data and feedback received during the FDA Advisory Committee meeting, the FDA required a boxed warning and a revision specifically for the allergic rhinitis indication to reserve use of montelukast to patients who have an inadequate response or intolerance to alternative therapies. Based on benefit-risk considerations, the asthma indication was not changed. To provide insight into the process and rationale for the required labeling changes, we provide an overview of the decision-making framework we used.


Asunto(s)
Etiquetado de Medicamentos , Quinolinas , Acetatos/efectos adversos , Ciclopropanos , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Sulfuros , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Pharmacotherapy ; 40(11): 1099-1107, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33090530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous small vessel vasculitis (CSVV) has been reported after exposure to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban. OBJECTIVE: We used the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to describe clinical characteristics associated with CSVV among DOAC-exposed patients. Furthermore, we characterized this signal in the Sentinel System to relate the clinical data from the individual FAERS cases to population-based electronic healthcare data. METHODS: We queried FAERS for all cases of CSVV associated with DOACs from U.S. approval date of each DOAC through March 16, 2018. Within the Sentinel System, we identified incident CSVV cases using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes among adults aged ≥ 30 years who received a DOAC in the prior 90 days between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2018. We excluded patients with evidence of select autoimmune diagnoses in the 183 days prior to their CSVV diagnoses and reported patient characteristics in the 183-day period prior to CSVV diagnoses. RESULTS: In FAERS, we identified 50 cases of CSVV reported with rivaroxaban (n=26), apixaban (n=14), dabigatran (n=9), and edoxaban (n=1). Approximately 50% of the cases reported time to onset within 10 days after DOAC exposure. When specified, the predominant type of CSVV reported was leukocytoclastic vasculitis (n=31), followed by Henoch-Schonlein purpura (n=4). Hospitalization occurred in most of the cases (n=37). Switching of the offending agent after the development of CSVV was reported (n=26). Three rivaroxaban (n=3) cases and one dabigatran case (n=1) reported positive rechallenge. In the Sentinel system, we identified 3659 CSVV cases with prior DOAC exposure, with 85% of events occurring within 10 days. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of FAERS cases, combined with the temporal clustering of the Sentinel System cases suggest a possible causal relationship of DOACs and CSVV. Future efforts should characterize the risk of CSVV among the various DOAC users.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Vasculitis/epidemiología , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration , Vasculitis/etiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 28(10): 1361-1368, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31410932

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We validated an algorithm to detect frequency errors in computerized healthcare data and estimated the incidence of these errors in an integrated healthcare system. METHODS: We applied Sentinel System analytic tools on the electronic health records of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, January 1, 2010, through May 30, 2015,to identify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with new use of methotrexate (365-day baseline period). We identified potential methotrexate frequency errors using ICD-9 code 995.20 (adverse drug event), Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 96409 for injection of leucovorin and prescription refill patterns. We performed chart review to confirm the frequency errors, assessed performance for detecting frequency errors, and estimated the incidence of chart-confirmed errors. RESULTS: The study included 24,529 methotrexate dispensings among 3,668 RA patients. Among these, 722 (3%) had one dispensing and 23,807 (97.1%) had ≥2 dispensings during 1-year follow-up period. We flagged 653 (2.7%) with a potential medication error (46 with one dispensing and 607 with ≥2 dispensings). We sampled 94 for chart review, and confirmed three methotrexate errors. All three confirmed frequency errors involved a first methotrexate dispensing followed by injected rescue therapy, leucovorin, (positive predictive value, 60%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15-95%). No potential errors were found among patients with ≥2 dispensings. We estimated the frequency error incidence among one methotrexate dispensing to be 0.4% (95%CI, 0.1% to 1.2%). CONCLUSION: Rescue therapy is a specific indicator of methotrexate overdose among first methotrexate dispensings. This method is generalizable to other medications with serious adverse events treated with antidotes.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Administración Oral , Antídotos , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , California/epidemiología , Codificación Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquema de Medicación , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Errores de Medicación/efectos adversos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA