Effectiveness and safety of topical application of diphenylcyclopropenone versus podophyllin in treatment of genital warts.

BACKGROUND: Many therapeutic modalities are available for treating genital warts; however, the effectiveness of both diphenylcyclopropenone and podophyllin is still controversial. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of diphenylcyclopropenone and podophyllin in treating genital warts. METHODS: This study included 57 patients, divided randomly into two groups. Group (A): diphenylcyclopropenone (n = 29). Group (B): podophyllin 25% (n = 28). In group (A), sensitization was done with 2% diphenylcyclopropenone. Then, after 1 or 2 weeks, treatment started with a weekly application of diphenylcyclopropenone solutions ranging between 0.001 and 1% until clearance, or for a maximum of 10 sessions. In group (B), podophyllin 25% was applied weekly until clearance or for a maximum of 6 weeks. RESULTS: Higher clearance was achieved in group A, with 19 of 29 (65.5%) patients, than in group B, with 9 of 28 (32.1%) (p-value = 0.004). Also, effectiveness increases with young age in group A. Shorter wart duration was associated with better response in both groups (p-value = 0.005). No serious adverse effects occurred in either group. No recurrence was detected in group A, while seven patients (77.8%) had recurrence in group B after 1 year of follow up. CONCLUSION: Diphenylcyclopropenone shows a higher success rate than podophyllin in treating genital warts and a lower recurrence rate.

Efficacy and tolerability of using platelet-rich plasma versus chemical peeling in periorbital hyperpigmentation.

BACKGROUND: Various therapeutic modalities for periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH) have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and chemical peeling in POH. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this study and randomly subdivided into two groups. Group A patients were assigned to receive four sessions of chemical peeling using trichloroacetic acid and lactic acid, while group B was assigned to patients who received four sessions of PRP injection with 2 weeks of intervals. Patients were assessed by digital photographs. The degree of improvement included four degrees from poor to excellent, and side effects were reported. RESULTS: Females constituted 38 out of 42 patients (mean age, 28.14 ± 3.47 years). There was a significant improvement in favor of chemical peeling over PRP. Good improvement occurred in 47.6% in the group A versus 4.8% in group B (P < 0.001). None of the PRP group had excellent improvement, while 38% of chemical peeling group did. Most of group A patients reported very pleased (47.6%) to excellent (38%) degree, in contrast to group B where 52.5% were just pleased (P < 0.001). Some of group A patients experienced itching (14.3%) and redness (14.3%), while in group B, they experienced pain (23.8%) and edema (14.3%) with nonsignificant difference between both groups (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Both PRP and chemical peeling are effective for treatment of POH; however, chemical peeling is much more effective, tolerable, and satisfying procedure than PRP.

Carbon dioxide laser plus topical 5-fluorouracil: a new combination therapeutic modality for acral vitiligo.

BACKGROUND: Acral vitiligo (AV) is resistant to treatment. AIM: To evaluate efficacy and safety of combining carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in treating AV. METHODS: This study included 68 adult patients with AV. After randomly assigning patients into 3 groups, patients in group I were treated using 5FU, group II were treated using CO2 laser, and group III were treated using CO2 laser followed by 5FU for a maximum period of 5 months. The lesions were then evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. RESULTS: Almost half (49.8%) of the lesions in group III achieved G4, and 6.1% of lesions achieved G3 re-pigmentation. This response was statistically significantly higher than that in the other two groups. This was not achieved in periungual areas in the hands and feet. The pain was tolerable during sessions or at sites of 5FU application. Transient hyperpigmentation, brownish spot on nail plates, itching, and infection were temporary side effects; however, Koebnerization was not detected. CONCLUSION: We concluded that prior use of CO2 laser skin ablation, followed by 5FU application for AV is a safe and tolerable technique that improves the outcome and increases patient compliance.