RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) offers a non-ablative alternative to thalamotomy for the surgical treatment of medically refractory tremor in multiple sclerosis. However, relatively few outcomes have been reported. OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic review of the published cases of DBS use in multiple sclerosis and to present four additional patients. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative review of the published reports and description of a case series from one centre. RESULTS: In the majority of reported cases (n=75), the surgical target for DBS implantation was the ventrointeromedial nucleus of the thalamus. Tremor reduction and improvement in daily functioning were achieved in most patients, with 87.7% experiencing at least some sustained improvement in tremor control postsurgery. Effects on daily functioning were less consistently assessed across studies; in papers reporting relevant data, 76.0% of patients experienced improvement in daily functioning. Adverse effects were similar to those reported for DBS in other patient populations. CONCLUSIONS: Few of the studies reviewed used highly standardised quantitative outcome measures, and follow up periods were generally one year or less. Nonetheless, the data suggest that chronic DBS often produces improved tremor control in multiple sclerosis. Complete cessation of tremor is not necessarily achieved, there are cases in which tremor control decreases over time, and frequent reprogramming appears to be necessary.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Tálamo/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the ability of macrophage-activated killer cells (MAK cells) obtained from peripheral blood of normal volunteers to kill glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines. Another goal was to investigate whether a bispecific antibody (bsAb) MDX-447, recognizing the high-affinity Fc receptor for IgG (FcgammaRI) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), would enhance MAK cell tumoricidal activity. METHODS: Monocytes, from leukapheresis product, were isolated by countercurrent elutriation and differentiated into MAK cells by culture with granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, vitamin D3 and interferon gamma. Cells were checked for sterility, endotoxin and phenotypic markers. MAK cell functional activity was measured by a flow-cytometric phagocytosis assay. Target cells, a carcinoma cell line and two glioma cell lines expressing EGFR, were stained with PKH-26. MAK cells were labeled with fluorescein-conjugated anti-CD14. Combined effectors, targets and bsAb were incubated and the percentage of MAK cells with phagocytosed targets was determined by flow cytometry. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that a large number of highly purified monocytes, isolated from peripheral blood, can be differentiated into MAK cells for use as an adjuvant for cancer treatment. After culture these cells are sterile, endotoxin-free and comprise more than 95% MAK cells. Increased amounts of CD14, CD64 and HLA-DR, which are characteristics of macrophage activation, were expressed. MAK cells were extremely phagocytic in comparison to monocytes, even in the absence of bsAb. Moreover, bsAb enhanced the tumoricidal activity of elutriated MAK cells targeted against GBM cell lines. Therefore, intracavity MAK cells armed with MDX-447 could be an effective adoptive immunotherapy for EGFR-positive GBM.