Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 26(9): 1982-1997, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35680777

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alone or in combination with other agents for preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopanography. METHODS: We carried out a literature search of random controlled trials (RCTs) on preventing post-operative pancreatitis by administration of the anti-inflammatory drugs, indomethacin and diclofenac, following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The databases searched for relevant publications up to July 7, 2021, included PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. We screened the literature according to inclusion criteria and analyzed the extracted data. The overall population and high-risk patient groups were analyzed, with the main outcome being the incidence of PEP. RESULTS: The search identified 32 RCTs that included 15019 patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis and 9 different interventions. The results of the overall population network meta-analysis showed that NSAIDs alone, high-dose NSAIDs, and a combination of NSAIDs significantly reduced the incidence of PEP compared with placebo. However, compared with placebo, there was no statistically significant difference between the two interventions (NSAIDs + standard hydration and high-dose NSAIDs). In addition, NSAIDs + sublingual nitrates were associated with a lower incidence of PEP compared to that observed with NSAIDs alone. Probability ranking results showed that NSAIDs + sublingual nitrate had the best effect, followed by NSAIDs + standard hydration, NSAIDs + melatonin, NSAIDs + aggressive hydration, NSAIDs + somatostatin, NSAIDs alone, NSAIDs + epinephrine, high-dose NSAIDs, and placebo. In the high-risk subgroup, the results of the network meta-analysis showed that NSAIDs alone, high-dose NSAIDs, and a combination of NSAIDs showed no statistically significant difference in their ability to reduce the incidence of PEP compared with placebo. Probability ranking results showed that NSAIDs + hydration had the best effect, followed by NSAIDs + sublingual nitroglycerin and NSAIDs + aggressive hydration. CONCLUSION: Of the nine interventions, NSAIDs + sublingual nitrates had considerably better efficacy than the other drugs for reducing the incidence of PEP in the overall population. In high-risk patients, NSAIDs + standard hydration may be the best preventive treatment; however, more randomized, controlled trials are needed to validate our results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of the registry: PROSPERO-International prospective register of systematic reviews. Unique identifying number or registration ID: CRD42021282205.


Asunto(s)
Melatonina , Pancreatitis , Administración Rectal , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Diclofenaco/uso terapéutico , Epinefrina , Humanos , Indometacina , Metaanálisis en Red , Nitratos , Nitroglicerina , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/prevención & control , Somatostatina , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
2.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(14): e25287, 2021 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33832097

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: It is important for patients to maintain a good nutritional status as a health promotion strategy to improve the immune function and thus the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).The objective of this retrospective study is to analyze the relationships of nutritional status with inflammation levels, protein reserves, baseline immune status, severity, length of hospital stay, and prognosis of COVID-19 patients.A total of 63 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the People's Hospital and the Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of the Xinzhou District, Wuhan, China, from January 29, 2020 to March 17, 2020. Sixty-three patients were divided into 3 groups according to the guidelines, moderate (n = 22), severe (n = 14), and critical (n = 25), respectively. The differences in the total nutrition risk screening (NRS) score, inflammation level, protein reserve, baseline immune status, length of hospital stay, and prognosis were compared among patients with moderate, severe, and critical COVID-19.Patients with higher NRS scores tend to have more severe COVID-19, higher C-reactive protein and serum procalcitonin levels, higher white blood cell counts, lower lymphocyte counts, and higher mortality rates (P < .05).Nutritional status may be an indirect factor of the severity and prognosis of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/fisiopatología , Estado Nutricional/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Proteínas Sanguíneas , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Femenino , Globulinas/análisis , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Pronóstico , Proteínas , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
3.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 31(7): 836-844, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614882

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to confirm the clinical effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection, and further identify the patients who could benefit most from PA-TACE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Propensity score matching at a ratio of 1 : 2 was used between hepatectomy patients with and without receiving PA-TACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare overall survival and recurrence-free survival between two groups. Univariate COX regression and stratified analyses were performed to screen and identify survival predictors for PA-TACE patients. The identified predictive markers were validated in an external cohort. RESULTS: The propensity analysis matched 116 patients in PA-TACE group to 232 in the control group. Visible protective effect of PA-TACE was shown by survival curves in matched series (log-rank P=0.009 and 0.008), with hazard ratio of being 0.599 (95% confidence interval: 0.420-0.855) and 0.623 (95% confidence interval: 0.449-0.866), respectively, for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The identified prognostic predictors for PA-TACE included TNM stage, tumor size and number, hepatitis B infection, spleen diameter, preoperative serum α-fetoprotein, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and monocyte, and three risk signatures (aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index). CONCLUSION: The treatment effectiveness of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery was validated in this study, and the best candidates for PA-TACE were identified as well, including patients with late-stage tumor, portal hypertension, and high preoperative serum levels of α-fetoprotein, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and monocytes.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/sangre , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis B Crónica/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/epidemiología , Recuento de Leucocitos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monocitos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neutrófilos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Carga Tumoral , alfa-Fetoproteínas/metabolismo , gamma-Glutamiltransferasa/sangre
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29785189

RESUMEN

Echinococcosis is a worldwide anthropozoonosis which is highly endemic over large animal husbandry areas in northwestern China. The current clinical therapeutic medicine against echinococcosis is albendazole, although it caused serious side effects in patients. The component in traditional Chinese herb medicine, Sophora moorcroftiana alkaloids (SA), is thought to be a potential drug to treat echinococcosis. In order to explore the effect and mechanism of SA treatment against echinococcosis, we established animal echinococcosis model and treated rats with albendazole alone, alkaloids alone, and combined therapy. The combined treatment showed effective inhibition against parasite infection due to induction of host response and alleviated liver injury; meanwhile albendazole caused serious liver problem. The proteomics study revealed that the combined therapy might induce complement activation through C3, C4, C5, SERPINA1, and SERPINC1 proteins and cell adhesion by ANXA2, EZR, YWHAB, HSP90AN1, and PRKAR2A proteins, while albendazole treatment could induce liver injury through CRYAB, YWHAZ, SLC25A24, and HSPA1B proteins that were involved in cell death. In all, we consider that the combinational treatment displayed better therapeutic effects against liver echinococcosis as well as alleviated liver injury, which could be considered as an effective strategy to treat echinococcosis clinically.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA