Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction After Breast-Conserving Therapy and Radiation: Complications and Oncologic Safety.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) offers improved, patient-centered outcomes with demonstrated oncologic safety ( Ann Surg Oncol 2020;27:344-351). Indications for NSM continue to expand to patients outside of the traditional eligibility criteria, including those with prior breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with radiotherapy. Currently, limited data exist evaluating both short- and long-term outcomes in patients proceeding to NSM after prior BCT. METHODS: All patients undergoing bilateral NSM in a single institution from 2002 through 2017 with history of prior BCT were included in the final cohort, without exclusions. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, operative details, and complications. Outcomes assessed included early complications (<30 days from NSM), late complications (>30 days), rates of prosthetic failure, unplanned reoperations, and reconstructive failures, as well as oncologic safety. Student t , χ 2 , and Fisher exact tests were used to analyze outcomes of paired (BCT vs non-BCT) breasts within each patient. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients undergoing 34 NSMs were included. Each had a history of BCT and either ipsilateral breast recurrence (64.7%), risk-reducing NSM (23.5%), or a new contralateral primary cancer (11.8%). The cohort had a mean age of 51.1 years. With regard to acute complications (ischemia, infection, nipple-areolar complex or flap ischemia or necrosis, and wound dehiscence), there was no significant difference noted between breasts with prior BCT versus no prior BCT overall (41.2% vs 35.3%, respectively; P = 0.724). Complications occurring after 30 days postoperatively (capsular contracture, contour abnormality, animation deformity, bottoming out, rotation, and rippling) in prior BCT breasts versus no prior BCT had no significant differences overall (58.8% vs 41.2% respectively; P = 0.303). The mean follow-up was 5.5 years, during which no patients had a reported locoregional or distant recurrence in either breast. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in early or late complications were identified between breasts in patients undergoing bilateral NSM with a history of unilateral BCT and XRT. In the 5.5 years of follow-up, there were no recurrences, lending support to NSM for management of recurrent disease in addition to National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended total mastectomy. We propose that NSM should not be contraindicated in patients exposed to radiation with BCT.

Venous thromboembolism in plastic surgery: the current state of evidence in risk assessment and chemoprophylactic options.

The application of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been the topic of intense debate in plastic surgery. The overall incidence of VTE is low in plastic surgery patients as compared to other surgical subspecialties but may be higher in the inpatient rather than outpatient plastic surgery populations. The Caprini Risk Assessment Model is the most highly studied and validated tool to assess VTE risk in plastic surgery patients. However, the Caprini model lacks procedure-specific risk assessment and patient-specific risk factor calculations. Due to these limitations, such as the low incidence and the heterogeneous nature of the specialty, trials lacked the power to capture proof of benefit, except in the highest-risk inpatient population. The emerging use of aspirin and novel oral anticoagulants may provide an alternative, as noninferiority in terms of efficacy and safety has been demonstrated in other fields. In this review, the authors intend to summarize the current state of evidence for prevention and explore the modalities available for prophylaxis, including novel oral anticoagulants.

Stage IV Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large-cell Lymphoma with Complete Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare lymphoma that has been associated with textured breast implants. Most cases present as a delayed (>1 year) seroma, which can be aspirated for diagnosis. Fewer patients present with masses or skin signs. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment for this form of lymphoma. For advanced disease, treatment is multidisciplinary and incorporates adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and potentially, the immunotherapeutic agent brentuximab vedotin, an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate. However, relapse rates are high among patients with peripheral ALCL. We present the case of a 39-year-old woman who developed BIA-ALCL 13 years after augmentation with silicone, textured implants and had a complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (hydroxydaunomycin), vincristine (Oncovin), etoposide, prednisolone (CHOEP) at time of bilateral removal of implants and capsules. CHOEP is a long-standing regimen for treatment of peripheral ALCL and is a suggested regimen for treatment of BIA-ALCL. This case report is the first to demonstrate the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of BIA-ALCL and suggests a role for its use in advanced disease.