Concurrent chemoradiotherapy by simultaneously integrated boost volumetric-modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma-toxicity/quality of life and survival.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the toxicity, changes of quality of life (QOL), and survival for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with simultaneously integrated boost volumetric-modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT). METHODS: A total of 68 NPC patients treated by CCRT with SIB-VMAT technique were collected. QOL was longitudinally assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 and HN35 questionnaires at the 4 time points: baseline, 42.4 Gy (20 fractions), and 3, 12 months after CCRT. RESULTS: The 4-year locoregional relapse free, distant metastasis free, failure free, and overall survival rates were 97.0%, 86.4%, 82.0%, and 88.1%, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence rate of late toxicities with grade 3 or more was 3.0%. One year after CCRT, most QOL scales, except some oral related symptoms, recovered to baseline level. CONCLUSION: CCRT with SIB-VMAT produces excellent locoregional control, few severe late toxicity, and good general health status for NPC patients.

Can high-dose-rate brachytherapy prevent the major genitourinary complication better than external beam radiation alone for patients with previous transurethral resection of prostate?

PURPOSE: To compare the grade 3 genitourinary toxicity and oncological outcome for localized prostate cancer between high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone in patients with previously undergone Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 1998 to November 2008, 78 patients with a history of TURP underwent radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Of these, 59 were enrolled in this study. In this study, 34 patients underwent HDR brachytherapy and 25 patients underwent EBRT alone. RESULTS: Grade 3 genitourinary complication was observed in 8.8 % of HDR brachytherapy group and 44 % in EBRT alone group. Five-year urinary incontinence rate was 2.9 % in HDR brachytherapy and 24 % in EBRT alone group. The results showed that significant higher incidence of grade 3 genitourinary complication (p = 0.003) and urinary incontinence was the most significant (p = 0.023) in the EBRT alone group. Five-year biochemical survival rate was 82.4 % in HDR brachytherapy group and 72.0 % in EBRT alone group (p = 0.396). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prostate cancer who have previously undergone TURP, we observed that HDR brachytherapy was able to control prostate cancer with fewer GU morbidities and oncological outcomes that were similar to those associated with traditional EBRT alone. Moreover, HDR brachytherapy led to a decrease in major GU toxicity and also preserved the sphincter function more than that in TURP patients who underwent EBRT alone.

Postoperative low pelvic radiotherapy and chemotherapy for stage II and III rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether postoperative low pelvic radiotherapy (RT) combined with chemotherapy is an appropriate treatment for stage II and III rectal cancer. METHODS: Between November 1997 and May 2006, 104 patients with stage II and III rectal cancer underwent surgery as the primary treatment followed by postoperative RT combined with chemotherapy in our institute and were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-nine patients received low pelvic RT only (upper margin at 1 cm above the low end of the sacroiliac joint; median dose 54 Gy) (low pelvic RT group) and the other 35 patients received whole pelvic RT (upper margin at the mid L5; median dose 43.2 Gy) and subsequently received a boost to the low pelvis (total median dose 54 Gy) (whole pelvic RT group). RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival rate, local control rate, and distant metastasis-free rate were 72% versus 63%, 86% versus 84%, and 66% versus 62% for low pelvic versus whole pelvic RT group. There were no statistical differences in these 2 groups. Two patients (2.9%) of the low pelvic RT group and 2 patients (5.7%) of the whole pelvic RT group developed upper pelvis relapse, which was out of the low pelvic field. The incidence of Grade 3 to 5 small bowel late complications of the low pelvic RT group was significantly less than that of the whole pelvic RT group (4.3% vs. 20%) (P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Low pelvic RT significantly reduces small bowel late complications and does not compromise the overall survival rate, local control rate, and distant metastasis-free rate.

Previous transurethral resection of the prostate is not a contraindication to high-dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse retrospectively the morbidity and efficacy of high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients who had a previous transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Morbidities documented in the records of 32 patients with previous TURP and 106 with no previous TURP, treated with HDR brachytherapy for prostate cancer at our institution, were analysed and compared. All patients received HDR brachytherapy as a boost before conformal external beam radiotherapy. We recorded and analysed genitourinary complications, rectal morbidity, and the biochemical control rate as assessed by the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. RESULTS: All complications of patients who received HDR brachytherapy were recorded during the follow-up. All gastrointestinal and genitourinary complications were not significantly different in patients with or without previous TURP. There was little incontinence or severe morbidity associated with HDR brachytherapy. The PSA-based biochemical control rates were similar in patients with or without previous TURP in each risk group. CONCLUSIONS: HDR brachytherapy is a reasonable treatment for localized prostate cancer in patients who have had a previous TURP, with the expectation of low morbidity and satisfactory biochemical control.