Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Environ Monit ; 14(7): 1789-97, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22487808

RESUMEN

Drinking water treatment typically uses strong oxidants such as chlorine which are capable of converting Cr(III) to Cr(VI). The rates and extent of Cr(III) oxidation by chlorine are not well established. Cr(III) oxidation experiments were therefore conducted in distilled deionized water and New York City tap water dosed initially with Cr(III) and supplemented with sodium hypochlorite to increase free chlorine residual. Reaction progress was monitored using capillary electrophoresis which quenched reactions and allowed for quantification of Cr(VI). Three different forms of Cr(III) were used as reactants: a Cr(III) nitrate salt, Cr(III)-EDTA, and Cr(III) hydroxide. Rates of Cr(VI) production for all three forms of Cr(III) were rapid, on the order of hours. However, oxidation rates slowed and a plateau in Cr(VI) concentrations was reached. This resulted in less than 100% conversion of Cr(III) to Cr(VI) even at relatively high chlorine doses (10 to 100 mg L(-1) as Cl(2)). The loss of free chlorine due to a non-Cr chlorine demand, the precipitation of Cr(III) to Cr(OH)(3)(s), and the partial oxidation of Cr(III) to intermediate oxidation states (i.e. Cr(IV) and Cr(V)) were examined and eliminated as possible explanations for this behavior. Consumption of chlorine via reaction with intermediate oxidation states of Cr is therefore offered as a possible explanation for the plateau in Cr(VI) concentrations.


Asunto(s)
Cromo/química , Agua Potable/química , Halogenación , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/química , Purificación del Agua/métodos , Cromo/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Ciudad de Nueva York , Oxidación-Reducción , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis
2.
Integr Environ Assess Manag ; 8(1): 17-31, 2012 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21793200

RESUMEN

An approach for comparing laboratory and field measures of bioaccumulation is presented to facilitate the interpretation of different sources of bioaccumulation data. Differences in numerical scales and units are eliminated by converting the data to dimensionless fugacity (or concentration-normalized) ratios. The approach expresses bioaccumulation metrics in terms of the equilibrium status of the chemical, with respect to a reference phase. When the fugacity ratios of the bioaccumulation metrics are plotted, the degree of variability within and across metrics is easily visualized for a given chemical because their numerical scales are the same for all endpoints. Fugacity ratios greater than 1 indicate an increase in chemical thermodynamic activity in organisms with respect to a reference phase (e.g., biomagnification). Fugacity ratios less than 1 indicate a decrease in chemical thermodynamic activity in organisms with respect to a reference phase (e.g., biodilution). This method provides a holistic, weight-of-evidence approach for assessing the biomagnification potential of individual chemicals because bioconcentration factors, bioaccumulation factors, biota-sediment accumulation factors, biomagnification factors, biota-suspended solids accumulation factors, and trophic magnification factors can be included in the evaluation. The approach is illustrated using a total 2393 measured data points from 171 reports, for 15 nonionic organic chemicals that were selected based on data availability, a range of physicochemical partitioning properties, and biotransformation rates. Laboratory and field fugacity ratios derived from the various bioaccumulation metrics were generally consistent in categorizing substances with respect to either an increased or decreased thermodynamic status in biota, i.e., biomagnification or biodilution, respectively. The proposed comparative bioaccumulation endpoint assessment method could therefore be considered for decision making in a chemicals management context.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Contaminantes Ambientales/metabolismo , Contaminantes Ambientales/toxicidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Animales , Contaminantes Ambientales/análisis , Cadena Alimentaria , Humanos , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA