Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(24): e26344, 2021 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34128884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of adding alpha lipoic acid (ALA) to pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treatment of lumbar-sacral pain was evaluated. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the effect of using ALA as an adjuvant therapy with PRF for treatment of chronic lumbosacral radicular pain caused by herniated disc. METHODS: One hundred twenty patients with lumbo-sacral radicular pain allocated into 2 groups. Group I: treated with PRF at 42°C for 120 seconds. Group II: treated as in group I, plus oral ALA 600 mg (Thiotacid 600 mg, EVA PHARMA, Egypt) three times per day (1800 mg/day) for 3 weeks then 600 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The lumbo-sacral radicular pain evaluated using the numerical rating pain score and Oswestry Disability Index. RESULTS: Success rate was significantly higher in group II at 3 and 6 months after intervention. The median values of the numerical rating pain score and the Oswestry Disability Index were significantly lower in group II with no significant difference in Epworth Sleepiness Scale. No major complications were reported in both groups. CONCLUSION: The current study supports the use of ALA with PRF on the dorsal root ganglion for treating lumbosacral radicular pain.


Asunto(s)
Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Radiculopatía/terapia , Ácido Tióctico/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Humanos , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/etiología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiculopatía/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Urol Ann ; 7(3): 325-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26229319

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Possible approaches for postoperative analgesia after pediatric inguinoscrotal surgery are caudal block by bupivacaine/ketamine (BK) and bupivacaine/magnesium sulfate (BM). AIM: The purpose of the following study is to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of ketamine and magnesium sulfate in combination with bupivacaine for caudal blockade in pediatric patients after inguinoscrotal operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients randomly received one of the two solutions for caudal epidural injection after induction of general anesthesia. Group-BK: Were given a mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine. Group-BM: Were given a mixture of 0.25% bupivacaine and 50 mg magnesium sulfate. Postoperatively, a blinded post-anesthesia care unit nurse assessed the quality of analgesia with a visual pain analog scale (VPAS). Significant pain is defined as one that has a VAPS of ≥3. RESULTS: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists I-II children (20 in each group) completed the study. The two groups were comparable regards age, sex, body mass index, anesthesia and surgery durations, recovery time and sevoflurane concentration. The mean duration of caudal analgesia ± standard deviation was 462 ± 17.2 min versus 398.05 ± 12.9 min for BK and BM groups, receptively (P < 0.001). Supplemental rectal paracetamol within 12 h postoperatively were 15% for BK group versus 25% for BM (P = 0.05). Four patients in BK group only experienced postoperative nausea and vomiting (P = 0.053). CONCLUSION: Caudal administration of BK is efficient and safe for pediatric inguinoscrotal operations with longer postoperative analgesia than BM sulfate.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA