Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Blood Adv ; 6(8): 2510-2516, 2022 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34731884

RESUMEN

The 2017 version of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations, by integrating cytogenetics and mutational status of specific genes, divides patients with acute myeloid leukemia into 3 prognostically distinct risk categories: favorable (ELN2017-FR), intermediate (ELN2017-IR), and adverse (ELN2017-AR). We performed a post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto) AML1310 trial to investigate the applicability of the ELN2017 risk stratification to our study population. In this trial, after induction and consolidation, patients in complete remission were to receive an autologous stem cell transplant (auto-SCT) if categorized as favorable risk or an allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) if adverse risk. Intermediate-risk patients were to receive auto-SCT or allo-SCT based on the postconsolidation levels of measurable residual disease as measured by using flow cytometry. Risk categorization was originally conducted according to the 2009 National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommendations. Among 500 patients, 445 (89%) were reclassified according to the ELN2017 criteria: ELN2017-FR, 186 (41.8%) of 455; ELN2017-IR, 179 (40.2%) of 445; and ELN2017-AR, 80 (18%) of 455. In 55 patients (11%), ELN2017 was not applicable. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 68.8%, 51.3%, 45.8%, and 42.8% for the ELN2017-FR, ELN2017-IR, ELN2017-not classifiable, and ELN2017-AR groups, respectively (P < .001). When comparing the 2 different transplant strategies in each ELN2017 risk category, a significant benefit of auto-SCT over allo-SCT was observed among ELN2017-FR patients (2-year OS of 83.3% vs 66.7%; P = .0421). The 2 transplant procedures performed almost equally in the ELN2017-IR group (2-year OS of 73.9% vs 70.8%; P = .5552). This post hoc analysis of the GIMEMA AML1310 trial confirms that the ELN2017 classification is able to accurately discriminate patients with different outcomes and who may benefit from different transplant strategies. This trial was registered as EudraCT number 2010-023809-36 and at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01452646.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante Homólogo , Humanos , Neoplasia Residual , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo
2.
Eur J Haematol ; 92(6): 527-36, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24580147

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the absence of randomized, controlled trial data to support iron chelation therapy in transfusion-dependent patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), continued evidence from large prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of iron chelation therapy in this patient population is warranted. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of deferasirox was examined in a prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial of transfusion-dependent patients with International Prognostic Scoring System low- or intermediate-1-risk MDS and evidence of transfusion-related iron overload. The effects of deferasirox therapy on hematological response and disease progression were also examined. RESULTS: Of 159 participants enrolled from 37 Italian centers, 152 received ≥1 dose of deferasirox (initiated at 10-20 mg/kg/day and titrated as appropriate), and 68 completed the study. Of 84 patients who discontinued deferasirox therapy, 22 died during the trial, and 28 withdrew due to an adverse event (AE). Fourteen treatment-related grade 3 AEs occurred in 11 patients, whereas no grade 4 or 5 drug-related AEs were reported. Significant risks for dropout were a higher serum ferritin level at baseline, a higher MDS-Specific Comorbidity Index, and a shorter diagnosis-enrollment interval. Median serum ferritin level fell from 1966 ng/mL to 1475 ng/mL (P < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of transfusion independence, adjusted for death and disease progression, was 2.6%, 12.3%, and 15.5% after 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Deferasirox therapy in transfusion-dependent patients with MDS was moderately well tolerated and effectively lowered serum ferritin levels. Positive hematological responses were observed, and a subset of patients achieved transfusion independence.


Asunto(s)
Benzoatos/uso terapéutico , Transfusión Sanguínea , Quelantes del Hierro/uso terapéutico , Sobrecarga de Hierro/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobrecarga de Hierro/etiología , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/complicaciones , Síndromes Mielodisplásicos/terapia , Triazoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Benzoatos/efectos adversos , Deferasirox , Femenino , Ferritinas/sangre , Humanos , Quelantes del Hierro/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Reacción a la Transfusión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA