RESUMEN
Fractures occurring with very little trauma are often caused by osteoporosis and can lead to disability. This study demonstrates that a coordinator working with an orthopaedic team can significantly increase the number of individuals receiving appropriate treatments during their after-fracture care to prevent future fractures from occurring. PURPOSE: Well-implemented Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) programs increase appropriate investigation and treatment for osteoporosis after low trauma fracture. This research evaluates the effectiveness of the first FLS program implemented in British Columbia (BC), Canada. METHODS: A controlled before-and-after study was conducted. The intervention was an FLS program implemented at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic at Peace Arch Hospital in BC. Eligible patients were those over the age of 50 years with a low trauma fracture of the hip, pelvis, vertebra, wrist or humerus. A nurse practitioner FLS coordinator identified, investigated and initiated treatment in patients based on their future fracture risk. The primary outcome was the percentage of all patients at high-risk to refracture, who achieved at least one of the following outcomes: (1) started on osteoporosis medication, (2) referred to an osteoporosis consultant or (3) assessed for treatment change if they were already on osteoporosis medication at the time of the fracture. Secondary outcomes included the rate of bone density testing, referral to fall prevention programs and change in health-related quality of life over 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients participated in the study (65 in the usual care group, 130 in the FLS group). Average age was 70.5 years (standard deviation 11.5), and 84% of participants were female. In the FLS group, 77.8% of high-risk patients achieved the primary outcome compared with 22.9% in the usual care group. CONCLUSION: In BC, the implementation of an FLS program improved investigation and treatment for osteoporosis after low trauma fracture.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Osteoporosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/prevención & control , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea/fisiología , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Colombia Británica , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis/fisiopatología , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Prevención Secundaria/organización & administración , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Importance: Falls result in substantial burden for patients and health care systems, and given the aging of the population worldwide, the incidence of falls continues to rise. Objective: To assess the potential effectiveness of interventions for preventing falls. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ageline databases from inception until April 2017. Reference lists of included studies were scanned. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of fall-prevention interventions for participants aged 65 years and older. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Pairs of reviewers independently screened the studies, abstracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted. Main Outcomes and Measures: Injurious falls and fall-related hospitalizations. Results: A total of 283 RCTs (159â¯910 participants; mean age, 78.1 years; 74% women) were included after screening of 10â¯650 titles and abstracts and 1210 full-text articles. Network meta-analysis (including 54 RCTs, 41â¯596 participants, 39 interventions plus usual care) suggested that the following interventions, when compared with usual care, were associated with reductions in injurious falls: exercise (odds ratio [OR], 0.51 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.79]; absolute risk difference [ARD], -0.67 [95% CI, -1.10 to -0.24]); combined exercise and vision assessment and treatment (OR, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.38]; ARD, -1.79 [95% CI, -2.63 to -0.96]); combined exercise, vision assessment and treatment, and environmental assessment and modification (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.70]; ARD, -1.19 [95% CI, -2.04 to -0.35]); and combined clinic-level quality improvement strategies (eg, case management), multifactorial assessment and treatment (eg, comprehensive geriatric assessment), calcium supplementation, and vitamin D supplementation (OR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.55]; ARD, -2.08 [95% CI, -3.56 to -0.60]). Pairwise meta-analyses for fall-related hospitalizations (2 RCTs; 516 participants) showed no significant association between combined clinic- and patient-level quality improvement strategies and multifactorial assessment and treatment relative to usual care (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.33 to 1.81]). Conclusions and Relevance: Exercise alone and various combinations of interventions were associated with lower risk of injurious falls compared with usual care. Choice of fall-prevention intervention may depend on patient and caregiver values and preferences.
Asunto(s)
Prevención de Accidentes/métodos , Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Ejercicio Físico , Trastornos de la Visión/diagnóstico , Anciano , Calcio/uso terapéutico , Suplementos Dietéticos , Planificación Ambiental , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Vitamina D/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The objectives of this three-phased investigation were to (1) characterize existing recreational programming opportunities for tenants residing in assisted living (AL) and (2) gather perceptions on factors influencing activity program planning and delivery. Using an integrated knowledge translation framework during a one-year collaboration, we targeted 51 publicly funded AL sites from two health authorities in British Columbia. We conducted an activity calendar review, staff survey, and interactive symposia to identify factors that enabled or restricted recreational programming. From the information obtained, we determined that all AL sites delivered recreational programming. Although exercise and physical activity opportunities were perceived as having high importance, most activities were social. Staff reported confidence in delivering this type of programming and believed it met the holistic needs of tenants, including their mental well-being, and fostered a sense of community. Future avenues for increasing physical activity of AL tenants should address individual, site, and organizational characteristics.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Vida Asistida , Recreación , Participación Social , Anciano , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To report 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentrations, an indicator of vitamin D status, in older adults living in residential care 1 year after a protocol of weekly 20,000 IU of vitamin D was started. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Five residential care facilities in British Columbia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Residents aged 65 and older from five facilities (N=236). MEASUREMENTS: Participants provided a blood sample. Demographic and health information was obtained from the medical record. RESULTS: Mean 25OHD was 102 nmol/L (95% confidence interval (CI)=98-106 nmol/L). Three percent of residents had a 25OHD concentration of less than 40 nmol/L, 6% <50 nmol/L, and 19% <75 nmol/L. In those who received 20,000 IU/wk or more for 6 months or longer (n=147), mean 25OHD was 112 nmol/L (95% CI=108-117 nmol/L), and none had a 25OHD level of less than 50 nmol/L. Hypercalcemia (>2.6 mmol/L), a potential consequence of too much vitamin D, was present in 14%, although 25OHD levels did not differ in those with and without hypercalcemia (108 vs 101 nmol/L; P=.17). CONCLUSION: Twelve months after implementation of a 20,000-IU/wk vitamin D protocol for older adults in residential care, mean 25OHD concentrations were high, and there was no evidence of poor vitamin D status. Given the absence of demonstrated benefit of high 25OHD concentrations to the residential care population, dosages less than 20,000 IU/wk of vitamin D are recommended.