An epidemiological survey on the allergological importance of some emerging pollens in Italy.

Epidemiological studies on the pollens responsible for allergic diseases throughout Italy are lacking. Routine diagnostic panels consist prevalently of grass, Parietaria, weeds, birch, olive and mugwort. Considering the great variety of Italian geographical areas and the observation of the growing allergological importance of new botanical species (e.g., ambrosia), a survey on pollen species considered "minor" was necessary. A panel of "emerging" pollens (birch, hazelnut, alder, hornbeam, cypress, ragweed) and a routine panel were used to skin prick test 2,934 consecutive outpatients with respiratory pathology of suspected allergic origin, in 21 centers across Italy. A specific questionnaire was compiled. It was found that 20.1% of patients did not react to allergens tested, 28.2% were positive for at least one emerging pollen and 51.7% did not react to emerging pollens but tested positive for at least one allergen from the routine panel. The prevalence of single pollen species was related to geographical areas. Ragweed pollen was shown to provoke asthma much more frequently than other pollens. Hitherto scarcely considered pollens play a considerable role in causing allergic diseases in Italy. In the great majority of patients, positivity for these pollens was associated with positivity to the better recognized group of pollen allergens, although in some cases they were the primary pathogenic agent. We suggest that these more recently considered allergens be included in routine diagnostic panels.

Safety and efficacy of sublingual rush immunotherapy with grass allergen extracts. A double blind study.

Thirty-four patients suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma due to grass pollen, were submitted to sublingual immunotherapy according to a double blind placebo controlled experimental plan; eighteen patients received the active therapy, sixteen the placebo. A rush preseasonal treatment schedule was followed in order to reach the maintenance dose in 15 days with two administrations per day; the top dose reached was then administered three times a week until the end of the pollen season. The symptoms and drugs related to rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma were recorded by means of diary cards and grass pollen counts were performed during the season. The actively treated group showed a reduction of symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma and a lower intake of drugs for the same symptoms; all these differences resulted to be statistically significant. No patient showed local or systemic side effects of any relevance. According to these results of our study, sublingual rush immunotherapy is clinically effective and because of the ease of handling, the shortness of the treatment, the absence of relevant side effects and the high compliance of the patient can be considered as an alternative to classic injective immunotherapy in grass pollen allergic patients.

Rush immunotherapy with sublingual administration of grass allergen extract.

A study of RUSH specific immunotherapy by sublingual route has been performed. Twenty patients have been studied suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis a/o allergic asthma to grass pollen, divided in two homogeneous groups. The first group was treated with immunotherapy, the other was used as a comparison in open. The level of specific IgG4, specific IgE, drug consumption and the symptom score were monitored. The symptom and drug scores recorded by the patients during the pollen season were significantly reduced in the group undergoing sublingual allergen administration, thus proving the clinical efficacy of this treatment. There has not been, however, a significant reduction of specific IgE, nor a significant increase of specific IgG4 towards grasses, in the treated group, monitored before and at the end of the immunotherapy.