Treatment of nail psoriasis with Pulse Dye Laser plus calcipotriol betametasona gel vs. Nd:YAG plus calcipotriol betamethasone gel: An intrapatient left-to-right controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of nail psoriasis remains a challenging and often disappointing situation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, adverse reactions and tolerability of treatment of nail psoriasis with PDL vs. Nd:YAG, in association with betametasona calcipotriol gel. METHODS: An open, prospective intrapatient left-to-right study was designed. The right hand of each patient received treatment with PDL and the left hand with Nd:YAG. Betamethasone calcipotriol gel was applied once a day during the first week after each laser session. A total of four sessions were administered. RESULTS: The clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the NAPSI score. All patients showed improvement in nail bed and nail matrix psoriasis. The global NAPSI mean declined in 15.46 (p<0.000). There was neither statistical difference between the reduction in nail bed and matrix NAPSI nor in the treatment with PDL vs. Nd:YAG. The administration of Nd:YAG was more painful. No serious adverse effects were documented. LIMITATIONS: No random assignment and the small number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: PDL and Nd:YAG have proven to be an effective treatment for nail psoriasis with no serious adverse effect. No statistically significant difference was found between the two treatments.

Methanol conversion over a Pd5Cu/Al2O3-CeO2 catalyst: an FT-IR study and reaction mechanism.

A catalyst composed of a Pd(5)Cu mixed oxide supported over Al(2)O(3)-CeO(2) with general formula Pd(5)CuO(x)/Al(2)O(3)-CeO(2) (Al/Ce atomic ratio=1/1) has been prepared by a wet impregnation method and tested in the methanol conversion. The structural and morphological characterization of the catalyst evidences that it is a mesoporous material thermally stable up to 873 K. At that temperature the specific surface area value is 170 m(2)/g, and a CeO(2) cubic phase is identified together with ill-defined diffraction peaks tentatively assigned to Cu-Pd clusters, suggesting that the active phase is well dispersed over the support. Infrared studies prove that methanol conversion takes place over the catalyst to a high extent yielding syngas as main product in the range 473-723 K and methane at higher temperatures. Oxygenated intermediates containing methoxy, carbonile or formiate species are not detected, which evidences that methanol conversion to methane very probably takes place according to a via-carbide mechanism.

Efectos adversos observados durante la terapia biológica en la psoriasis. Resultados de una encuesta al Grupo Español de Psoriasis / Adverse reactions during biological therapy for psoriasis: results of a survey of the Spanish Psoriasis Group

Introducción: La terapia biológica ha representado un avance muy importante en el tratamiento de la psoriasis, al tratarse de una generación de fármacos más selectivos y con mejor perfil de seguridad a corto y medio plazo. Existen datos sólidos a favor de la eficacia de cada uno de estos fármacos, así como de su seguridad. A pesar de ello, siempre es útil aportar la experiencia clínica de dermatólogos expertos en el tratamiento de la psoriasis con biológicos, en especial en lo referente a su seguridad. Material y métodos: Se realizó una encuesta a los miembros del Grupo Español de Psoriasis (GEP) basada en una serie de ítems relativos a aspectos referentes a la seguridad clínica de estos fármacos, cuyos resultados se presentan en este artículo. Un total de 988 pacientes tratados con efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab y adalimumab fueron recogidos por parte de 15 miembros del GEP. Resultados: Entre los resultados obtenidos destaca la elevada proporción de reacciones a infliximab (34%). Se observaron alteraciones analíticas en el 13,25% de los pacientes e infecciones en el 12,24%, con un único caso de tuberculosis pulmonar. Es de destacar el perfil de efectos secundarios de efalizumab: artritis de novo en el 5,8% y rebote en el 20,9%. Conclusión: Los datos de seguridad aportados por nuestro trabajo deben tenerse en consideración, habida cuenta del importante número de pacientes reclutados por un grupo de dermatólogos expertos en el manejo de este tipo de fármacos (AU)

Background: Biologic therapies have been a major breakthrough in the treatment of psoriasis because they are more selective and have a better short-term and medium-term safety profile. There are reliable data to support both the efficacy and the safety of these drugs. However, it is always useful to report the clinical experience of dermatologists who are experts in the use of biologic agents to treat psoriasis, particularly with regard to their safety. Material and Methods: We present the results of a survey administered to the members of Spanish Psoriasis Group and based on a series of questions referring to the clinical safety of these agents. A total of 988 patients treated with efalizumab, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab were reported by 15 members of the group. Results: There was a particularly high proportion of reactions (34%) to infliximab infusions. Blood test abnormalities were detected in 13.25% of patients and infections in 12.24%, with one case of pulmonary tuberculosis. Attention is drawn to the adverse effects profile of efalizumab: de novo arthritis in 5.8% and rebound in 20.9% of patients. Conclusion: The safety data provided by our study should be taken into account in view of the large number of patients recruited by dermatologists experienced in the use of this type of therapy (AU)

[A case of excellent response to efalizumab. Experience in the University Hospital of Salamanca]. / Un caso con excelente respuesta a efalizumab. Experiencia en el Hospital Universitario de Salamanca.

Before initiating treatment with efalizumab, or with any other biological treatment, it is necessary to use objective assessment techniques that allow us to evaluate the activity on course of psoriasis, thus being able to justify the indication of biological therapy and to evaluate the percentage of response to treatment, loss of response or its possible inefficacy. In spite of its limitations, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is the best available option. The definition of moderate psoriasis has been proposed as beginning with a baseline PASI = 7 while serious psoriasis has a score of, according to the different authors, 10 or 12. In the usual clinical practice, other parameters must also be evaluated in the definition of the seriousness of psoriasis and in the indication of establishing a systemic treatment since some forms of psoriasis have a more aggressive course (erythrodermic psoriasis, pustulous psoriasis) and there are locations (head, genitals, hands, etc.) that interfere more intensely with the quality of life of the patients, with increase of social dysfunction, physical incapacity and psychological deterioration. All of the patients treated with biological therapy in our hospital site fulfill the criteria established by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA): adult patients with psoriasis in chronic moderate-to-serious ones who have not responded or in its use is contraindicated or who do not tolerate another systemic therapy, including, cyclosporine, methotrexate or phototherapy.

Un caso con excelente respuesta a efalizumab. Experiencia en el Hospital Universitario de Salamanca / A case of excellent response of efalizumab. Experience in the University Hospital of Salamanca

Antes de iniciar el tratamiento con efalizumab, o con cualquier tratamiento biológico, es necesario utilizar técnicas de valoración objetiva que nos permitan evaluar la actividad y la evolución de la psoriasis, para así poder justificar la indicación de la terapia biológica, así como valorar el porcentaje de respuesta al tratamiento, la pérdida de respuesta o su posible ineficacia. A pesar de sus limitaciones, el índice de intensidad y gravedad de la psoriasis (PASI) es la mejor opción disponible. La definición de psoriasis moderada se ha propuesto a partir de un PASI basal = 7 mientras que para la psoriasis grave es, según los distintos autores, 10 o 121. En la práctica clínica habitual, en la definición de la gravedad de la psoriasis y en la indicación de establecer un tratamiento sistémico es preciso valorar también otros parámetros, ya que algunas formas de psoriasis tienen un curso más agresivo (psoriasis eritrodérmica, pustulosa) y existen localizaciones (cabeza, genitales, manos, etc.) que interfieren más intensamente en la calidad de vida de los pacientes, con aumento de la disfunción social, de la discapacidad física y del deterioro psicológico 2,3. Todos los pacientes tratados con terapia biológica en nuestro centro hospitalario cumplen los criterios establecidos por la European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA): pacientes adultos con psoriasis en placas crónica moderada grave que no han respondido o tienen contraindicada o no toleran otra terapia sistémica incluyendo ciclosporina, metotrexato o fototerapia (AU)

Before initiating treatment with efalizumab, or with any other biological treatment, it is necessary to use objective assessment techniques that allow us to evaluate the activity on course of psoriasis, thus being able to justify the indication of biological therapy and to evaluate the percentage of response to treatment, loss of response or its possible inefficacy. In spite of its limitations, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is the best available option. The definition of moderate psoriasis has been proposed as beginning with a baseline PASI =7 while serious psoriasis has a score of, according to the different authors, 10 or 121 In the usual clinical practice, other parameters must also be evaluated in the definition of the seriousness of psoriasis and in the indication of establishing a systemic treatment since some forms of psoriasis have a more aggressive course (erythrodermicpsoriasis, pustulous psoriasis) and there are locations (head, genitals, hands, etc.) that interfere more intensely with the quality of life of the patients, with increase of social dysfunction, physical incapacity and psychological deterioration 2,3. All of the patients treated with biological therapy in our hospital site fulfill the criteria established by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA): adult patients with psoriasis in chronic moderate-to-serious ones who have not responded or in its use is contraindicated or who do not tolerate another systemic therapy, including, cyclosporine, methotrexate or phototherapy (AU)