Real-world care for individuals aged over fifty with fractures in France: Evidence for a wide care gap-The EPIFRACT Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the care trajectories of adults aged ≥50 years with fragility fractures in France. METHODS: A postal questionnaire was sent to 15,000 individuals aged ≥50 years extracted from a representative panel of the French population (METASKOPE) in April-May 2018. Respondents experiencing a single fragility fracture in the previous three years constituted the study population. Information was collected regarding diagnosis, hospitalisations, physician visits and treatment related to the fractures. RESULTS: 13,914 participants returned a questionnaire (92.8%), of whom 436 reported a single fragility fracture. Their mean age was 68.7±10.3 years. 11.9% of this sample had undergone bone densitometry (DXA) prior to the fracture and 11.9% had received a diagnostic of osteoporosis. Following the fracture, a further 17.4% underwent DXA and 8.5% were diagnosed with osteoporosis. 74.3% of fractures were initially managed in an emergency department and 29.6% led to immediate hospitalisation. Prior to fracture, 3.4% received a specific anti-osteoporotic treatment, 10.1% vitamin D and 6.4% calcium supplementation. After the fracture, these figures rose to 10.8%, 26.8% and 19.0% respectively. 86.2% participants made at least one follow-up visit to a physician. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of DXA screening following fragility fractures in subjects over fifty is very low. Most patients with fragility fractures did not receive a diagnosis of osteoporosis. The proportion of patients treated with a specific anti-osteoporotic treatment after a fracture is low even though around half consulted their general practitioner after the fracture. Practice guidelines are thus not being adhered to in everyday clinical practice in France.

Medication management after intramedullary nailing of atypical fractures.

Long term use of bisphosphonates (BPs) in osteoporotic patients may be associated with stress fractures of the sub-trochanteric and shaft area of the femur, so called "atypical" femoral fractures (AFF). Specific diagnosis criteria have been defined with 5 major features; the presence of four of them characterizes the AFF. Once a complete fracture occurred, the best surgical treatment is closed reduction and intra medullary nailing. The BPs treatment should be stopped immediately after an AFF occurred. Dietary calcium and vitamin D status should be assessed, and adequate supplementation prescribed. Principle of combination of a systematic bone anabolic treatment is strongly debated. The recombinant parathyroid hormone 1-34 or Teriparatide ® (TPTD) has an anabolic effect on bone and prevent osteoporotic fractures. Available preclinical and clinical data have also demonstrated the role played by TPTD to enhance bone fracture healing and the potential beneficial effect in impaired fracture healing or specific clinical condition like AFFs. Some authors have proposed in incomplete BP use stress fractures different medical management according the MRI findings. Bone anabolic agents may be promising both to prevent healing complications in AFFs and to promote healing in conservative treatment of incomplete AFFs. More clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.