Absorbed dose measurements from a 90Y radionuclide liquid solution using LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosimeters.

In the last few years there has been an increasing interest in the measurement of the absorbed dose from radionuclides, with special attention devoted to molecular radiotherapy treatments. In particular, the determination of the absorbed dose from beta emitting radionuclides in liquid solution poses a number of issues when dose measurements are performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). Finite volume effect, i.e. the exclusion of radioactivity from the volume occupied by the TLD is one of these. Furthermore, TLDs need to be encapsulated into some kind of waterproof envelope that unavoidably contributes to beta particle attenuation during the measurement. The purpose of this study is twofold: I) to measure the absorbed dose to water, Dw, using LiF:Mg,Cu,P chips inside a PMMA cylindrical phantom filled with a homogenous 90YCl3 aqueous solution II) to assess the uncertainty budget related to Dw measurements. To this purpose, six cylindrical PMMA phantoms were manufactured at ENEA. Each phantom can host a waterproof PMMA stick containing 3 TLD chips encapsulated by a polystyrene envelope. The cylindrical phantoms were manufactured so that the radioactive liquid environment surrounds the whole stick. Finally, Dw measurements were compared with Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. The measurement of absorbed dose to water from 90YCl3 radionuclide solution using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs turned out to be a viable technique, provided that all necessary correction factors are applied. Using this method, a relative combined standard uncertainty in the range 3.1-3.7% was obtained on each Dw measurement. The major source of uncertainty was shown to be TLDs calibration, with associated uncertainties in the range 0.7-2.2%. Comparison of measured and MC-calculated absorbed dose per emitted beta particle provided good results, with the two quantities being in the ratio 1.08.

Characterization of hepatic and cardiac iron deposition during standard treatment of anaemia in haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Parenteral iron is integral in the treatment of anaemia of chronic kidney disease patients on haemodialysis (HD). However, increased liver iron concentration (LIC) can result from such treatment, and this correlates poorly with serum ferritin or transferrin saturation values. It is unclear whether increased cardiac iron concentration also occurs in this setting. We aimed to evaluate the relationship of intravenous iron supplementation to hepatic and cardiac iron deposition in chronic HD subjects. METHODS: A cohort of 10 patients on chronic HD for at least 1 year underwent MRI-based quantitation of hepatic and cardiac iron content to evaluate the relationship between intravenous iron supplements and hepatic and cardiac iron deposition. The results were compared against the cumulative parenteral iron dose and serum iron markers. RESULTS: The median age was 61 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 50-71), HD time 2.5 years (95%CI 2.0-5.3) and cumulative iron dose 4300 mg (95%CI 2110-9045). Hepatic iron concentration was elevated in eight of 10 subjects (median 46 mmol/kg, range 31-76). Cardiac iron levels were within the reference range in all subjects. There was poor correlation between conventional haematinic values and either LIC or cardiac iron levels. None of the study subjects exhibited elevated cardiac iron concentration. CONCLUSION: Whilst HD patients receiving standard parenteral iron therapy have elevated LICs, this is not associated with cardiac iron deposition. Transferrin saturation and serum ferritin levels are poor markers of either liver or cardiac iron deposition in HD subjects.

Serum iron markers are inadequate for guiding iron repletion in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Iron (Fe) overload may complicate parenteral Fe therapy used to enhance the efficacy of erythropoietic-stimulating agents in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease. However, serum Fe markers are influenced by inflammation or malignancy and may not accurately reflect the amount of body Fe. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We studied the relationship between parenteral Fe therapy, conventional serum Fe markers, and liver iron concentration (LIC) measured using magnetic resonance R2 relaxometry (FerriScan) in 25 Fe-deficient predialysis chronic kidney disease patients before and 2 and 12 weeks after single high-dose intravenous Fe and in 15 chronic hemodialysis patients with elevated serum ferritin (>500 µg/L). RESULTS: In predialysis patients, there was strong dose dependency between the administered Fe dose and changes in LIC at weeks 2 and 12; however, no dose dependency between Fe dose and changes in ferritin or transferrin saturation (TSAT) were observed. In hemodialysis patients, LIC correlated with the cumulative Fe dose and duration of dialysis but not with current ferritin or TSAT. The cumulative Fe dose remained a significant independent predictor of LIC in a multiple regression model. Two dialysis patients who received >6 g parenteral Fe had substantially elevated LIC >130 µmol/g, which is associated with hemochromatosis. CONCLUSIONS: In Fe-deficient predialysis patients, intravenous Fe therapy is associated with increases in LIC unrelated to changes in conventional Fe markers. In hemodialysis patients, TSAT and ferritin are poor indicators of body Fe load, and some patients have LICs similar to those found in hemochromatosis.

Licorice: a sweet alternative to prevent hyperkalemia in dialysis patients?

In patients on hemodialysis, Farese et al. report that inhibition of the enzyme 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 by glycyrrhetinic acid, the active compound of licorice, reduces serum potassium concentration and the frequency of hyperkalemia, possibly by enhancing intestinal potassium loss. This finding could be an important tool to maintain predialysis [K(+)] within safe limits in some dialysis patients at risk of hyperkalemic arrhythmias.

High prevalence of ascorbate deficiency in an Australian peritoneal dialysis population.

BACKGROUND: An adequate total body pool of ascorbate is essential for optimum health in humans. Requirements for ascorbate are increased in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients most likely due to a combination of poor nutrition and increased dialysate losses. METHODS: We measured serum ascorbate levels in 45 clinically stable PD patients to assess the prevalence of ascorbate insufficiency (level between 2 and 4 mg/L) and deficiency (level <2 mg/L). We also assessed the efficacy of subsequent supplementation and patients' adherence to the prescribed supplementation. All patients were advised on commencement of dialysis to take a multivitamin tablet containing 100-120 mg ascorbate. RESULTS: Eighteen (41%) PD patients were regularly taking ascorbate-containing multivitamins, while 27 (59%) patients did not take ascorbate supplements. Serum ascorbate levels ranged from <0.2 to 41 mg/L, with wide variations in serum ascorbate at any given intake level. Ascorbate deficiency was present in 1/3 of the current PD population (44% of patients not taking supplements and in 16% of those on supplements), although none of the patients demonstrated clinical manifestations of scurvy. Targeted supplementation of ascorbate insufficient patients increased the median serum ascorbate level from 1.7 mg/L (IQR 1.2-2.2) to 22.5 mg/L (IQR 16.7-32.9). CONCLUSION: Our results show that, in PD patients, ascorbate deficiency is common and can readily be identified with serum ascorbate measurements. Oral supplements in the form of inexpensive multivitamin preparations restore adequate serum ascorbate levels in the majority of these patients. We therefore suggest measurement of ascorbate levels in all PD patients at the commencement of dialysis with a target level in the normal range (4-14 mg/L).