Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Biol Chem ; 299(1): 102726, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410438

RESUMEN

The characterization of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is of high value for understanding protein function. Two strategies are popular for identification of PPIs direct from the cellular environment: affinity capture (pulldown) isolates the protein of interest with an immobilized matrix that specifically captures the target and potential partners, whereas in BioID, genetic fusion of biotin ligase facilitates proximity biotinylation, and labeled proteins are isolated with streptavidin. Whilst both methods provide valuable insights, they can reveal distinct PPIs, but the basis for these differences is less obvious. Here, we compare both methods using four different trypanosome proteins as baits: poly(A)-binding proteins PABP1 and PABP2, mRNA export receptor MEX67, and the nucleoporin NUP158. With BioID, we found that the population of candidate interacting proteins decreases with more confined bait protein localization, but the candidate population is less variable with affinity capture. BioID returned more likely false positives, in particular for proteins with less confined localization, and identified low molecular weight proteins less efficiently. Surprisingly, BioID for MEX67 identified exclusively proteins lining the inner channel of the nuclear pore complex (NPC), consistent with the function of MEX67, whereas the entire NPC was isolated by pulldown. Similarly, for NUP158, BioID returned surprisingly few PPIs within NPC outer rings that were by contrast detected with pulldown but instead returned a larger cohort of nuclear proteins. These rather significant differences highlight a clear issue with reliance on a single method to identify PPIs and suggest that BioID and affinity capture are complementary rather than alternative approaches.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas , Proteómica , Biotinilación , Poro Nuclear , Proteínas/química , Proteómica/métodos , Estreptavidina/química
3.
PLoS Genet ; 10(2): e1004007, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24516393

RESUMEN

Members of the family Trypanosomatidae infect many organisms, including animals, plants and humans. Plant-infecting trypanosomes are grouped under the single genus Phytomonas, failing to reflect the wide biological and pathological diversity of these protists. While some Phytomonas spp. multiply in the latex of plants, or in fruit or seeds without apparent pathogenicity, others colonize the phloem sap and afflict plants of substantial economic value, including the coffee tree, coconut and oil palms. Plant trypanosomes have not been studied extensively at the genome level, a major gap in understanding and controlling pathogenesis. We describe the genome sequences of two plant trypanosomatids, one pathogenic isolate from a Guianan coconut and one non-symptomatic isolate from Euphorbia collected in France. Although these parasites have extremely distinct pathogenic impacts, very few genes are unique to either, with the vast majority of genes shared by both isolates. Significantly, both Phytomonas spp. genomes consist essentially of single copy genes for the bulk of their metabolic enzymes, whereas other trypanosomatids e.g. Leishmania and Trypanosoma possess multiple paralogous genes or families. Indeed, comparison with other trypanosomatid genomes revealed a highly streamlined genome, encoding for a minimized metabolic system while conserving the major pathways, and with retention of a full complement of endomembrane organelles, but with no evidence for functional complexity. Identification of the metabolic genes of Phytomonas provides opportunities for establishing in vitro culturing of these fastidious parasites and new tools for the control of agricultural plant disease.


Asunto(s)
Kinetoplastida/genética , Enfermedades de las Plantas/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Trypanosomatina/genética , Animales , Cocos/genética , Cocos/parasitología , Café/genética , Café/parasitología , Francia , Genoma , Humanos , Kinetoplastida/patogenicidad , Enfermedades de las Plantas/parasitología , Semillas/parasitología , Trypanosomatina/patogenicidad
4.
Pharm Res ; 26(10): 2259-69, 2009 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19669867

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Preliminary evidence has suggested a synergistic interaction between pregabalin and sildenafil for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The focus of this study was to determine the influence of sildenafil on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pregabalin with the objective of informing the design of a quantitative pharmacodynamic (PD) study. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics were determined in rats following 2-hr intravenous infusions of pregabalin at doses of 4 mg/kg/hr and 10 mg/kg/hr with and without a sildenafil bolus (2.2 mg) and steady state infusion (12 mg/kg/hr for 6 h). This PK model was utilized in a preclinical trial simulation with the aim of selecting the optimal sampling strategy to characterize the PK-PD profile in a future study. Eight logistically feasible PK sampling strategies were simulated in NONMEM and examined through trial simulation techniques. RESULTS: A two-compartment population PK model best described pregabalin pharmacokinetics. Significant model covariates included either a binary effect of sildenafil administration (30.2% decrease in clearance) or a concentration-dependent effect due to sildenafil's active metabolite. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of simulations indicated that three post-PD samples had the best cost/benefit ratio by providing a significant increase in the precision (and minor improvement in bias) of both PK and PD parameters compared with no PK sampling.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Modelos Biológicos , Piperazinas/farmacología , Piperazinas/farmacocinética , Sulfonas/farmacología , Sulfonas/farmacocinética , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/análogos & derivados , Animales , Estudios Cruzados , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Interacciones Farmacológicas/fisiología , Masculino , Pregabalina , Purinas/farmacocinética , Purinas/farmacología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Citrato de Sildenafil , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/farmacocinética , Ácido gamma-Aminobutírico/farmacología
5.
Bioorg Med Chem Lett ; 16(9): 2333-6, 2006 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15946842
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA