Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neuro Oncol ; 17(2): 266-73, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239666

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chemoradiation, followed by adjuvant temozolomide, is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Adding other active agents may enhance treatment efficacy. METHODS: The primary objective of this factorial phase II study was to determine if one of 3 potential chemotherapy agents added to dose-dense temozolomide (ddTMZ) improves progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. A prior phase I trial established the safety of combining ddTMZ with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and/or thalidomide. Adults with good performance status and no evidence of progression post chemoradiation were randomized into 8 arms: ddTMZ alone (7 days on/7 days off) or doublet, triplet, and quadruplet combinations with isotretinoin, celecoxib, and thalidomide. RESULTS: The study enrolled 155 participants with a median age of 53 years (range, 18-84 y). None of the agents demonstrated improved PFS when compared with arms not containing that specific agent. There was no difference in PFS for triplet compared with doublet regimens, although a trend for improved overall survival (OS) was seen (20.1 vs 17.0 months, P = .15). Compared with ddTMZ, the ddTMZ + isotretinoin doublet had worse PFS (10.5 vs 6.5 months, P = .043) and OS (21.2 vs 11.7 months, P = .037). Trends were also seen for worse outcomes with isotretinoin-containing regimens, but there was no impact with celecoxib or thalidomide combinations. Treatment was well tolerated with expected high rates of lymphopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not establish a benefit for these combinations but indicate that adding isotretinoin to ddTMZ may be detrimental. This study demonstrated the feasibility and utility of the factorial design in efficiently testing drug combinations in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00112502.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Isotretinoína/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Talidomida/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Celecoxib , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Dacarbazina/administración & dosificación , Dacarbazina/uso terapéutico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Isotretinoína/administración & dosificación , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirazoles/administración & dosificación , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Temozolomida , Talidomida/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
2.
J Thorac Oncol ; 5(11): 1835-40, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20881645

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor affecting pathways involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. We conducted a phase II trial of sorafenib in platinum-treated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer to determine the tumor response rate, toxicity, and overall survival. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed, measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0 to 1, and no more than 1 prior platinum-based treatment were eligible. Patients were stratified by platinum-sensitivity status: sensitive (progression >90 days after platinum) or refractory (progression during or ≤90 days after platinum). Patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day continuously on a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Of 89 patients registered, 82 were evaluable for toxicity assessment, and 83 were evaluable for response. There were four partial responses seen among the 38 patients in the platinum-sensitive stratum, for an estimated response rate of 11% (95% confidence interval: 3-25%), and one partial response among the 45 patients in the platinum-refractory stratum, for an estimated response rate of 2% (95% confidence interval: 0-12%). The median overall survival estimates were 6.7 months (95% confidence interval: 6.1-9.1 months) for the platinum-sensitive stratum and 5.3 months (95% confidence interval: 3.3-7.5 months) in the platinum-refractory stratum. Nineteen patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events or side effects from therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the lack of disease control seen in our trial, further investigation of single-agent sorafenib in the small cell lung cancer population is not recommended. Combination trials of sorafenib and chemotherapy are ongoing.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Bencenosulfonatos/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Terapia Recuperativa , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Inducción de Remisión , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células Pequeñas/patología , Sorafenib , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA