Contemporary trends in management of stage 1 seminoma.

PURPOSE: Surveillance is now the preferred treatment strategy for patients with stage 1A/1B seminoma as reflected by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. In this study, we aimed to describe trends in adjuvant management strategy for stage 1A/B seminoma from 2004 to 2016 using the National Cancer Database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database was queried for patients diagnosed with stage 1A/1B seminoma between 2004 and 2016. Staging was determined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines. Surveillance was defined as no treatment with chemotherapy or radiation within 60 days of diagnosis. Proportions of cancer patients utilizing surveillance, radiation, and single-agent chemotherapy were summarized annually. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare overall survival between groups. RESULTS: 8,686 patients with stage 1A/1B seminoma met inclusion criteria over the course of the study period. Overall, 3,004 (34.6%) patients began adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation within 60 days. Utilization of surveillance increased from 39.8% in 2004 to 86.8% in 2016 while utilization of radiation decreased from 59.7% to 4.6%. High-volume centers adopted surveillance earlier than low-volume centers. CONCLUSION: This study describes trends in utilization of surveillance, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage 1A/1B seminoma over 12 years. A major shift from utilization of adjuvant treatment to surveillance in patients with stage 1A/B seminoma is observed in this large national cancer database; a minority of patients now receive adjuvant treatment and risk-related toxicities. Survival analysis reveals similar survival at a median 5-year follow-up. The results provide insight into the time needed for clinical practice to adopt the preferred approach of surveillance over the time period studied.

A prospective analysis of health-related quality of life in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients managed with intensity modulated radiation therapy, with vs. without hormonal therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Combined radiotherapy and hormonal treatment are recommended for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (CaP). This study compared the long-term effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of intermediate- and high-risk CaP patients managed with radiation therapy (RT) with vs. without hormone therapy (HT). METHODS: Patients with intermediate- and high-risk CaP enrolled in the Center for Prostate Disease Research diagnosed from 2007 to 2017 were included. EPIC and SF-36 questionnaires were completed and HRQoL scores were compared for patients receiving RT vs. RT + HT at baseline (pretreatment), 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after CaP diagnosis. Longitudinal patterns of change in HRQoL were modeled using linear regression models, adjusting for baseline HRQoL, age at CaP diagnosis, race, comorbidities, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratum, time to treatment, and follow-up time. RESULTS: Of 164 patients, 93 (56.7%) received RT alone and 71 (43.3%) received RT + HT. Both groups reported comparable baseline HRQoL. Patients receiving RT+HT were more likely to be NCCN high risk as compared to those receiving only RT. The RT + HT patients experienced worse sexual function, hormonal function, and hormonal bother than those who only received RT; however, HRQoL recovered over time for the RT + HT group. No significant differences were observed between groups in urinary and bowel domains or SF-36 mental and physical scores. CONCLUSION: Combined RT + HT treatment was associated with temporary lower scores in sexual and hormonal HRQoL compared with RT only. Intermediate- and high-risk CaP patients should be counseled about the possible declines in HRQoL associated with HT.