Detection and treatment of Candida auris in an outbreak situation: risk factors for developing colonization and candidemia by this new species in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Candida auris is an emerging, multidrug-resistant yeast causing hospital outbreaks. This study describes the first 24 months of the ongoing C. auris outbreak in our hospital and analyzes predisposing factors to C. auris candidemia/colonization. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 12-month prospective, case-controlled study was performed including a total of 228 patients (114 colonized/candidemia and 114 controls). Data from the first 79 candidemia episodes and 738 environmental samples were also analyzed. Definitive C. auris identification was performed by ITS sequencing. Antifungal susceptibility was carried out by EUCAST methodology. RESULTS: Polytrauma (32%), cardiovascular disease (25%), and cancer (17%) were the most common underlying condition in colonized/candidemia patients. Indwelling CVC (odds ratio {OR}, 13.48), parenteral nutrition (OR, 3.49), and mechanical ventilation (OR, 2.43) remained significant predictors of C. auris colonization/candidemia. C. auris was most often isolated on sphygmomanometer cuffs (25%) patient tables (10.2%), keyboards (10.2%), and infusion pumps (8.2%). All isolates were fully resistant to fluconazole (MICs >64 mg/L) and had significantly reduced susceptibility to voriconazole (GM, 1.8 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Predictor conditions to C. auris colonization/candidemia are similar to other Candida species. C. auris colonizes multiple patient's environment surfaces. All isolates are resistant to fluconazole and had significant reduced susceptibility to voriconazole.

Impact of amikacin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index on treatment response in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the association between the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index and treatment response to amikacin in critically ill patients. METHODS: An observational prospective study was designed. Critically ill adult patients with infection due to amikacin-sensitive Gram-negative bacteria treated with amikacin were included. Amikacin maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) plasma concentration samples were taken during the first 48-96h after the beginning of treatment. The impact of Cmax/MIC ratio and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio on early and final clinical response, microbiological eradication, development of resistant strains and renal toxicity was analysed using a multivariate model. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients received amikacin treatment, of whom 71 (83.5%) achieved a Cmax/MIC >6, 66 (77.6%) a Cmax/MIC >8, 64 (75.3%) a Cmax/MIC >10 and 72 (84.7%) an AUC/MIC >65. Clinical response at the end of treatment was significantly greater in patients with Cmax/MIC >6 [OR=5.48 (95% CI 1.28-11.40)], Cmax/MIC >8 [OR=6.01 (2.41-12.2)] and Cmax/MIC >10 [OR=8.02 (2.21-14.2)]. Cmax/MIC >10 was associated with a non-significant increase in microbiological eradication [OR=2.84 (0.76-10.61)]. Achieving Cmax/MIC >6 was associated with a lower proportion of patients with selection of resistant strains or with an increase in amikacin MIC (27.8% vs. 10.2%). Amikacin AUC was associated with development of nephrotoxicity [ROC curve 0.77 (0.66-0.87)]. CONCLUSIONS: The Cmax/MIC ratio of amikacin in critically ill patients is directly related to the response to treatment and the selection of resistant strains.