Non-surgical local treatments of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Digital ulcers (DUs) are difficult to treat in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic (i.e., pharmacological) therapy is currently considered the 'standard of care'. Our aim was to examine the safety and efficacy of local, non-surgical treatment for SSc-DUs. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) of original research articles up to August, 29 2022 was performed according to the PICO framework. References were independently screened by two reviewers and risk of bias was assed using validated tools. Due to study heterogeneity narrative summaries are used to present data. RESULTS: Among 899 retrieved references, 14 articles were included (2 randomised trials (RTs), and 12 observational (OBS) studies). The most frequently studied procedure (5 studies) was botulin A toxin (hand or single finger) injection with a reported healing rate (HR) of 71%-100%. Amniotic and hydrocolloid membranes were examined in one study each and associated with a good HR. Tadalafil 2% cream was studied in a single study with a reduction in the number of DUs. Vitamin E gel was associated with a reduction in ulcer healing time. Low-level light therapy, hydrodissection and corticosteroid injection, extracorporeal shock wave (ESW) and photobiomodulation were evaluated in a single study each and showed a positive trend. Dimethyl sulfoxide was associated with significant local toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: A range of non-surgical, local treatments for SSc-DUs have been explored and showed efficacy to some extent. We have identified methodological flaws that should be avoided in the design of future studies to explore locally-acting treatments for SSc-DUs.

Expanding the Treatment Team: What Is the Role for Occupational Therapy, Physical Therapy, Wound Care, and Nutritional Support in Systemic Sclerosis?

The optimal systemic sclerosis (SSc) care plan includes an occupational therapist and physical therapist as well as wound care experts and a registered dietitian if indicated. Screening instruments for functional and work disability, hand and mouth limitations, malnutrition, and dietary intake can identify the need for ancillary support services. Telemedicine can assist in developing effective ancillary treatment plans. Reimbursement for services may limit access for patients with SSc to expand their care team but a focus on prevention rather than management of damage is recognized as an important unmet need in SSc. In this review, the role of a comprehensive care team for SSc is discussed.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of lenabasum in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: RESOLVE-1 design and rationale.

OBJECTIVES: The multi-systemic, heterogenous nature of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) presents challenges in designing clinical studies that can demonstrate a treatment effect on overall disease burden. We describe the design of the first Phase 3 study in dcSSc patients where the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Combined Response Index in diffuse cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score was chosen prospectively as the primary outcome. The CRISS measures key clinical disease parameters and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: RESOLVE-1 is a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of dcSSc patients evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenabasum. Patients ≥18 years of age with dc-SSc and disease duration ≤6 years were eligible. Patients could continue stable background therapy for dcSSc, including stable immunosuppressive therapies. They were randomised to lenabasum 5 or 20 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean change from baseline to 52 weeks in the ACR CRISS score. RESULTS: The study enrolled 365 patients over 1.5 years at 77 sites in 13 countries in North America, Europe, Israel, and Asia-Pacific, with the last patient first visit on May 1, 2019. CONCLUSIONS: RESOLVE-1 is the first Phase 3 interventional study to date in dcSSc to prospectively use the ACR CRISS as the primary efficacy outcome. Eligibility criteria allowed background therapy as might occur in clinical practice. This approach also facilitated timely patient enrolment. RESOLVE-1 provides a novel study design that may be used for future Phase 3 dcSSc studies to assess the holistic efficacy of therapy.

Probiotics for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated gastrointestinal bloating/ distention.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for gastrointestinal tract (GIT) disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is challenging as no immunosuppressive or anti-fibrotic therapy is available with clearly proven efficacy. Probiotics are viable, non-pathogenic microorganisms that are hypothesized to improve the composition of the intestinal microbiota from a potentially harmful composition to a composition that is beneficial to the host. Our hypothesis is that GIT symptoms in SSc patients with moderate bloating would improve with probiotic implementation. METHODS: Ten patients with a moderate-to-severe distention/bloating score (1.25-3.00) on the University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Tract 2.0 (UCLA SCTC GIT 2.0), but otherwise stable organ disease not requiring any medication adjustment were recruited from the University of Utah Scleroderma Center. We compared the GIT 2.0 scores at baseline and after 2 months of use of Align (bifidobacterium infantis; 109 CFU per capsule) or Culturelle (lactobacillus GG; 109 CFU per capsule) using paired t-test and calculated effect size (ES). RESULTS: Significant improvement in total GIT 2.0 score (ES = 0.82), reflux (ES = 0.33), bloating/distention (ES = 1.76), and emotional scales (ES = 0.18) were reported after two months of daily probiotic use. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests probiotics significantly improve the reflux, distention/ bloating, and total GIT scales in SSc patients. As hypothesized, the largest effect was seen in distention/bloating scale. Probiotics may be useful for treatment of SSc-associated distention/ bloating.

The utility of nutraceuticals in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) treatment is limited by the inability of prescribed medications to alter disease outcome. As a result, patients with OA often take food substances called nutraceuticals in an attempt to affect the structural changes that occur within a degenerating joint. The role of nutraceuticals in OA management can be defined only by an evidence-based approach to support their use. This paper reviews the clinical trials studying glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, vitamin C, vitamin E, and avocado-soybean unsaponifiables. It highlights the need for additional randomized, placebo-controlled trials to further define the utility of nutraceuticals in OA treatment.