RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) is a chronic, noncyclic pain condition which can lead to significant patient morbidity and disability. It is defined by pain in the pelvic region, lasting for greater than 3 to 6 months, with no readily identifiable disease process. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update of diagnosis and treatment of UCPPS. RECENT FINDINGS: UCPPS encompasses chronic pelvic pain syndrome or chronic prostatitis (CP/CPPS) in men and interstitial cystitis or painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) in women. Underlying inflammatory, immunologic, and neuropathic components have been implicated in the pathogenesis of UCPPS. For optimal patient management, an individualized and multimodal approach is recommended. Medical management and physical therapy are the mainstays of treatment. Injection therapy may offer additional relief in medically refractory patients. Further minimally invasive management may include spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation, though evidence supporting efficacy is limited.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Humanos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Puntos Disparadores/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Occipital nerve stimulation can be effective therapy for recalcitrant headache disorders. Lead migration remains the primary technical adverse event associated with this therapy. Revision surgery for occipital nerve stimulator leads sometimes requires exposure of all components including internal pulse generator, extension cables, connectors, and leads with multiple incisions. However, minimizing the invasiveness of revision surgery reduces the time, infection risk, and discomfort associated with the procedure. We describe two techniques that attempt to minimize the extent of revision surgery necessary for lead migration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We describe two minimally invasive revision techniques. One uses a 14-gauge Tuohy needle converted to a slotted needle. The other uses a standard Tuohy needle inserted subcutaneously into the anchor site along the desired course of the lead. RESULTS: Both techniques allow replacement of a migrated occipital nerve stimulator lead while eliminating the need to access connector or battery sites with multiple incisions. CONCLUSIONS: When migration occurs, the techniques described can simplify lead revision while minimizing the invasiveness of the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Electrodos Implantados/efectos adversos , Trastornos de Cefalalgia/terapia , Nervios Espinales/fisiología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño , Humanos , Agujas , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Reoperación/métodos , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Occipital nerve stimulation is a form of peripheral nerve stimulation used to treat refractory headache disorders. Various techniques have been described for occipital nerve stimulator implantation; these include midline cervical or retromastoid lead insertion with internal pulse generator placement in the infraclavicular, gluteal or low abdominal regions. Lead migration is one of the most common complications of occipital nerve stimulators. Implantation approaches that include remote battery sites may contribute to mechanical stress on the components, as the leads or extensions may traverse highly mobile body regions. In this technical report, we describe an occipital stimulator implantation technique that may be advantageous in terms of patient positioning, ease of surgical approach and minimization of mechanical stress on components.