Effect of Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761® on human cytochrome P450 activity: a cocktail interaction study in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: We assessed the human in vivo metabolic drug interaction profile of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761® with respect to the activities of major cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, randomized, three-fold crossover, cocktail phenotyping design was applied. In random order, the following treatments were administered to 18 healthy men and women for 8 days each: placebo twice daily, EGb 761® 120 mg twice daily, and EGb 761® 240 mg in the morning and placebo in the evening. In the morning of day 8, administration was performed together with the orally administered phenotyping cocktail (enzyme, metric): 150 mg caffeine (CYP1A2, paraxanthine/caffeine plasma ratio 6-h postdose), 125 mg tolbutamide (CYP2C9, plasma concentration 24-h postdose), 20 mg omeprazole (CYP2C19, omeprazole/5-hydroxy omeprazole plasma ratio 3-h postdose), 30 mg dextromethorphan (CYP2D6, dextromethorphan/dextrorphan plasma ratio 3-h postdose), and 2 mg of midazolam (CYP3A, plasma concentration 6-h postdose). Formally, absence of a relevant interaction was assumed if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for EGb 761®/placebo ratios of the metrics were within the 0.70-1.43 range. RESULTS: EGb 761®/placebo ratios for phenotyping metrics were close to unity for all CYPs. Furthermore, respective CIs were within the specified margins for all ratios except CYP2C19 for EGb 761® 120 mg twice daily (90% CI 0.681-1.122) and for CYP2D6 for EGb 761® 240 mg once daily (90% CI 0.667-1.281). These findings were attributed to the intraindividual variability of the metrics used. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: EGb 761® has no relevant effect on the in vivo activity of the major CYP enzymes in humans and therefore has no relevant potential to cause respective metabolic drug-drug interactions.

Absorption pattern of trospium chloride along the human gastrointestinal tract assessed using local enteral administration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The antimuscarinic drug trospium chloride is hydrophilic and therefore does not enter the CNS when used for the treatment of overactive bladder disturbances. However, the same property is the main reason for low and variable oral bioavailability. The present study was performed to assess the influence of intestinal site on absorption of the drug as the basis for the development of modified release preparations. METHODS: In a change-over pilot study, 8 healthy male volunteers received single 20 mg doses oftrospium chloride orally as a tablet (reference), as Eudragit-coated tablets dissolving at pH 6.0 (local administration into the small intestine), and rectally via a mini enema (corresponding to local administration into the large intestine). Plasma concentrations of trospium chloride were determined up to 36 hours after administration using GC/MS. RESULTS: Extent and rate of trospium chloride absorption declined rapidly upon administration into more distal regions of the gastrointestinal tract. C(max) (median: 6.42 ng/ml) and AUC(0.tlast) (42.28 ng/ml x h) were highest and t(max) (3.5 h) was shortest after administration of the reference tablet. AUC(0-tlast) reached 78% (90% CI 43 - 139%) after small intestine administration and 2% (90% CI 1 - 9%) following rectal administration, respectively, relative to the values for the oral tablet. CONCLUSION: Trospium chloride is absorbed primarily in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Development of modified release preparations must balance prolonged apparent absorption rates of the drug against a decrease in bioavailability.

Liver cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 is markedly inhibited by systemic but not by bath PUVA in dermatological patients.

BACKGROUND: Methoxsalen (8-MOP) may cause important pharmacokinetic drug interactions as it has been shown to inhibit and/or induce several drug-metabolizing enzymes in vitro, in animal models and in humans. OBJECTIVES: In order to assess the clinical importance of acute and chronic 8-MOP effects on the liver cytochrome P-450 enzyme CYP1A2 in vivo, we measured caffeine clearance in dermatological patients before the onset of systemic or bath psoralen + ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA) (8-MOP + UVA) therapy, on the first day and after 1 week of treatment. METHODS: Data from four patients with systemic PUVA and seven patients with bath PUVA were available (age range 23-71 years, five women and six men). RESULTS: For all of the patients, individual pre-PUVA caffeine clearance values were above the lower limit of previously assessed reference ranges. Systemic PUVA markedly decreased caffeine clearance by factors of 0.17 [90% confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.42] on the first day and 0.14 (90% CI 0.05-0.36) after 1 week of treatment, respectively, and values thus dropped below the reference ranges. In contrast, bath PUVA had no obvious effect on pre-PUVA clearance values as the latter changed by factors of 1.00 (90% CI 0.81-1.23) and 1.05 (90% CI 0.75-1.49) on the first day and after 1 week of treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic PUVA causes pronounced inhibition of liver CYP1A2, while bath PUVA has no such effect. The extent of interaction makes a dose adjustment for most CYP1A2 substrates such as theophylline mandatory in patients undergoing systemic PUVA.

Estimation of cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2 activity in 863 healthy Caucasians using a saliva-based caffeine test.

A pronounced variability limits the usefulness of CYP1A2 phenotyping for drug therapy, for evaluating liver function, and for assessing the role of this enzyme in carcinogenesis. To identify and quantify sources of this variation, we estimated CYP1A2 activity in 863 healthy Caucasians using caffeine clearance derived from saliva concentrations before and 5-7 h after a caffeine test dose. Data from 786 individuals were eligible for evaluation (mean age 39 years, 415 women including 94 taking oral contraceptives, 401 non-smokers). Overall geometric mean (geometric SD) caffeine clearance was 1.34 ml min(-1) kg b.w.(-1) (1.65). The effect of the following covariates was evaluated by analysis of covariance: age, sex, oral contraceptives, body height, body weight, body mass index, number of cigarettes smoked, tar exposure from smoking, several indices of dietary caffeine consumption, intake of sauerkraut, and country of residence (Germany, Bulgaria or Slovakia). Estimated changes relative to arbitrarily defined basal caffeine clearance (male, non-smoking, German resident) exerted by significant (P < 0.05) covariates were: coffee, 1.45-fold per litre of coffee drunk daily; body mass index, 0.99-fold per kg m(-2); smoking, 1.22-fold, 1.47-fold, 1.66-fold, and 1.72-fold for 1-5, 6-10, 11-20, and > 20 cigarettes smoked per day, respectively; oral contraceptives, 0.72-fold; country of residence, 0.81-fold and 0.74-fold for Bulgaria and Slovakia, respectively; female, 0.90-fold. These covariates explained 37% of overall variation. The 95% confidence interval of individual clearance was 0.46-2.20 times the predicted value. No relevant polymorphism was found for CYP1A2 activity when adjusted for covariate effects.

Drug interactions with grapefruit juice. Extent, probable mechanism and clinical relevance.

Concomitant intake with grapefruit juice increases the concentrations of many drugs in humans. The effect seems to be mediated mainly by suppression of the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP3A4 in the small intestine wall. This results in a diminished first pass metabolism with higher bioavailability and increased maximal plasma concentrations of substrates of this enzyme. The effect was most pronounced in drugs with a high first pass degradation and in many cases has the clear potential to reach clinical relevance, as shown by an occasional change in drug effects or tolerability. For felodipine, nitrendipine, nisoldipine and saquinavir, the interaction was most marked with median increases of area under the curve (AUC) and/or the maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration after single-dose administration (Cmax) values exceeding 70% of respective control periods. Less pronounced, but possibly relevant, concentration increases were found for nifedipine, nimodipine, verapamil, cyclosporin, midazolam, triazolam and terfenadine. This list is not complete because many drugs have not been studied yet. The components of grapefruit juice which are the most probable causes of the interactions are psoralen derivatives, but the flavonoid naringenin may also contribute. Concomitant grapefruit juice intake does not generally decrease the variability of drug pharmacokinetic parameters. Therefore, it is recommended that patients refrain from drinking grapefruit juice when they are taking a drug that is extensively metabolised, unless a lack of interaction has already been demonstrated for the drug. It is also recommended that drugs possibly interacting with grapefruit juice should be appropriately labelled. A place for grapefruit juice as a drug-sparing agent in treatment involving expensive medicine cannot be derived from the information currently available on grapefruit juice interactions.

Systematic screening for pharmacokinetic interactions during drug development.

The possible involvement of a new chemical entity in pharmacokinetic drug interactions is an important safety issue. Not all relevant drug combinations for evaluation of the interactive potential of a new drug can be examined. Therefore, experiments should be selected to provide information which is valid not only for the interaction investigated, but which can be extrapolated to other comedications. In this respect the typical approaches currently used, including interaction studies with high risk drugs and compounds frequently given as comedication, or studies involving standard inhibitors and standard substrates are unsatisfactory. A better approach is to characterize drugs according to their effects on the underlying pharmacokinetic processes. Indeed, recent progress in understanding drug interaction mechanisms and in the development and refinement of in vitro test systems enables in many cases experiments to be designed which predict the occurrence of drug interactions. This paper illustrates systematic investigational procedures based on mechanism of interaction. Interaction mechanisms involving drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and/or excretion are briefly summarized. Detailed proposals are derived which allow identification of the possible role of a new drug in interaction mechanisms for which valid test systems are available. Emphasis is placed on the rational selection of experiments with optimal cost-effectiveness. In vitro methods are integrated in the schemes wherever possible. In addition, it is proposed that pharmacoepidemiological screening, starting in phase II of drug development, be used to identify those relevant drug interactions missed by the mechanism-based approach. As exemplified by several recently discovered interactions it should be possible, by implementation of the proposed procedure, to avoid most serious unexpected adverse effects due to pharmacokinetic drug interactions.