Efficacy of the Castor Oil-Filled Capsule Method as Preparation for Colon Capsule Endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is useful as an alternative examination for patients in whom colonoscopy is difficult. The Japanese Association for Capsule Endoscopy has published a recommended regimen for CCE using castor oil, which is becoming a standard examination method for CCE in Japan. However, castor oil has an unpleasant flavor. Therefore, patient acceptance is not good. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to develop a castor oil-filled capsule and evaluate its feasibility and patient acceptance in a retrospective, comparative study. METHOD: A dissolution study of pig-derived gelatin capsules filled with castor oil was performed using artificial gastric juice. The CCE excretion rates within battery lifetime, CCE examination times, endoscopic colonic cleansing levels, and patient acceptability between CCE boosters with a castor oil-filled capsule and without castor oil were retrospectively compared using medical information, clinical data, and endoscopic findings at Takada Chuo Hospital from September 2016 to August 2019. RESULTS: The castor oil-filled capsules were completely disintegrated at approximately 1-3 min in artificial gastric juice. Bowel preparation with oil-filled capsules and without castor oil was performed in 27 and 24 patients, respectively. CCE excretion rates within battery life were 100% and 91.7% (p = 0.217), small bowel transit times were 115 min and 143 min (p = 0.046), colon transit times were 168 min and 148 min (p = 0.733), and adequate colonic cleansing rates were 85.2% and 86.3% (p = 1.000) in patients using bowel preparation with and without oil-filled capsules, respectively. Regarding acceptance, the taste was not problematic in 85.2%, and tolerability for the next CCE was 96.3%. CONCLUSIONS: CCE using a castor oil-filled capsule method achieved high examination performance and sufficient patient tolerability.

Helicobacter pylori and NSAID-induced gastric ulcer in a Japanese population.

A recent meta-analysis by Huang et al. clarified that Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are important factors for peptic ulcer. The results showed that the risk for ulcer in NSAID(+)/H. pylori(+) patients was 61.1 fold higher when compared with NSAID(-)/H. pylori(-) patients. Some gastric ulcers detected in patients on NSAID therapy may actually be caused by H. pylori, but it is difficult to differentiate NSAID-induced gastric ulcer from H. pylori-induced gastric ulcer. Several studies have investigated the effects of H. pylori eradication on ulcer healing. One study reported that H. pylori eradication actually lowered the healing rate of gastric ulcers. Because there have been no studies finding that H. pylori eradication facilitates healing, H. pylori eradication is not recommended for NSAID users. Concerning the efficacy of H. pylori eradication in the prevention of NSAID-induced gastric ulcer, a meta-analysis concluded that among all patients on NSAID therapy, H. pylori eradication lowered the prevalence of ulcer, which was particularly marked in NSAID-naïve patients. When compared with those of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), the preventative effects of H. pylori eradication were inferior. In Japan, national health insurance does not cover procedures that prevent or lower the risk for NSAID-induced ulcer. When administering NSAID to patients with risk factors, it is desirable to administer antiulcer agents.

Modified allele-specific primer-polymerase chain reaction method for analysis of susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori strains to clarithromycin.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Most clarithromycin-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori have a mutation from adenine (A) to guanine (G) at position 2142 or 2143 of the 23S rRNA gene. Our aim in this study was to develop a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay that could determine these mutations in a single reaction tube. METHODS: We designed the forward primer FP2143G and the reverse primer RP2142G, which specifically anneal with the 2143G- and 2142G-mutated sequences, respectively, of the 23S rRNA gene of H. pylori. We also designed the forward primer FP-1 and reverse primer RP-1 upstream and downstream from the positions 2142 and 2143, respectively, to distinguish the wild-type A2142G and A2143G mutations from each other by amplicon sizes. DNA was extracted from 292 gastric tissue samples positive for rapid urease test, and the DNA underwent the PCR reaction. The results were compared with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for clarithromycin. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori strains with A2142G, A2143G and wild type could be distinguished by amplicon sizes by a single PCR reaction. The genotyping results were correlated well with the MIC values for clarithromycin. The median MIC for clarithromycin of the wild-type strains was <0.015 microg/mL. Those of strains with 2142G or 2143G were > or =1.0 microg/mL. CONCLUSION: Our new PCR-based assay for 23S rRNA mutations of H. pylori is a useful method for detecting clarithromycin-resistant strains of H. pylori easily.

Effectiveness of minocycline-based triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Widespread use of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori has increased the prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant strains. The purpose of the present paper was to measure the in vitro antibacterial activity of minocycline against H. pylori, and study the effectiveness of minocycline-based first- and second-line eradication therapies. METHODS: For first-line therapy, 79 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin or with rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and minocycline. For second-line therapy, 88 patients were tested for sensitivity to metronidazole: 67 patients with metronidazole-sensitive strains received a 7-day course of rabeprazole, minocycline, and metronidazole; the remaining 21 patients were given a 7-day course of rabeprazole, minocycline, and faropenem. RESULTS: There was virtually no resistance to minocycline among the strains tested. The eradication rate of H. pylori infection in first-line therapy was significantly lower for minocycline-containing regimen (38.5%, 15/39) than for clarithromycin-containing regimen (82.5%, 33/40; P < 0.01). For second-line therapy, a high eradication rate against metronidazole-sensitive strains was obtained with rabeprazole, minocycline and metronidazole (85%, 57/67). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of rabeprazole, minocycline, and metronidazole is safe and effective for second-line therapy of H. pylori infection. Because this regimen can be administered to patients with penicillin allergy and patients who suffer adverse reactions to amoxicillin, such as diarrhea and other digestive symptoms, it should be considered useful for second- and third-line eradication therapy.