Highly efficient and sensitive patient-specific quality assurance for spot-scanned proton therapy.

The purpose of this work was to develop an end-to-end patient-specific quality assurance (QA) technique for spot-scanned proton therapy that is more sensitive and efficient than traditional approaches. The patient-specific methodology relies on independently verifying the accuracy of the delivered proton fluence and the dose calculation in the heterogeneous patient volume. A Monte Carlo dose calculation engine, which was developed in-house, recalculates a planned dose distribution on the patient CT data set to verify the dose distribution represented by the treatment planning system. The plan is then delivered in a pre-treatment setting and logs of spot position and dose monitors, which are integrated into the treatment nozzle, are recorded. A computational routine compares the delivery log to the DICOM spot map used by the Monte Carlo calculation to ensure that the delivered parameters at the machine match the calculated plan. Measurements of dose planes using independent detector arrays, which historically are the standard approach to patient-specific QA, are not performed for every patient. The nozzle-integrated detectors are rigorously validated using independent detectors in regular QA intervals. The measured data are compared to the expected delivery patterns. The dose monitor reading deviations are reported in a histogram, while the spot position discrepancies are plotted vs. spot number to facilitate independent analysis of both random and systematic deviations. Action thresholds are linked to accuracy of the commissioned delivery system. Even when plan delivery is acceptable, the Monte Carlo second check system has identified dose calculation issues which would not have been illuminated using traditional, phantom-based measurement techniques. The efficiency and sensitivity of our patient-specific QA program has been improved by implementing a procedure which independently verifies patient dose calculation accuracy and plan delivery fidelity. Such an approach to QA requires holistic integration and maintenance of patient-specific and patient-independent QA.

Stranded seed displacement, migration, and loss after permanent prostate brachytherapy as estimated by Day 0 fluoroscopy and 4-month postimplant pelvic x-ray.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the incidence of local displacement, distant seed migration to the chest, and seed loss after permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) with stranded seeds (SSs) using sequential two-dimensional fluoroscopic pelvic and chest x-rays. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 2010 and April 2014, a total of 137 patients underwent PPB and 4-month followup pelvic and chest x-ray imaging. All patients had exclusively SSs placed and an immediate postimplant fluoroscopic image of the seed cluster. Followup x-ray images were evaluated for the number, location, and displacement of seeds in comparison to Day 0 fluoroscopic images. Significant seed displacement was defined as seed displacement >1 cm from the seed cluster. Followup chest x-rays were evaluated for seed migration to the chest. RESULTS: Seed migration to the chest occurred in 3 of the 137 patients (2%). Seed loss occurred in 38 of the 137 patients (28%), with median loss of one seed (range, 1-16), and total seeds loss of 104 of 10,088 (1.0%) implanted. Local seed displacement was seen in 12 of the 137 patients (8.8%), and total seeds displaced were 0.15% (15/10,088). CONCLUSIONS: SS placement in PPB is associated with low rates of substantial seed loss, local displacement, or migration to the chest. Comparing immediate postimplant fluoroscopic images to followup plain x-ray images is a straightforward method to supplement quality assurance in PPB and was found to be useful in identifying cases where seed loss was potentially of clinical significance.