RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared the short-term outcomes between incision and drainage (ID) and hainosankyuto (TJ-122, Tsumura & Co, Tokyo, Japan) treatment for perianal abscess (PA) in infants. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 48 consecutive patients (median age 129 days; range 19-330 days) who presented with PA over a 3 year period. Group 1 comprised 26 patients who were treated with ID at presentation, and Group 2 comprised 22 patients who were treated with oral TJ-122 at presentation; oral treatment was continued until the disappearance of purulent discharge and resolution of induration at the abscess site. RESULTS: PAs were identified in all 48 patients at presentation. The median duration of follow-up was 26 months (range 13-40 months). At presentation, there were no differences in the gender, age, birth weight, duration of symptoms, skin erosion or prevalence of diarrhea between the two groups. Purulent discharge resolved within a median period of 26 days (range 7-42 days) in Group 2, but persisted for 40 days (range 4-196 days) in Group 1. The induration resolved within a median period of 39 days (range 7-91 days) in Group 2, but persisted for 70 days (range 4-308 days) in Group 1 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: TJ-122 treatment was more beneficial than ID in treating PA in infants.