Eficacia y seguridad de golimumab añadido a fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad en artritis reumatoide. Resultados del estudio GO-MORE en España / Efficacy and safety of golimumab as add-on therapy to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: Results of the GO-MORE study in Spain

Objetivos: Analizar la eficacia y la seguridad de golimumab en los 140 pacientes incluidos en España en la parte 1 del estudio GO-MORE, un estudio multinacional en artritis reumatoide (AR) activa a pesar del tratamiento con distintos fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME). Pacientes y métodos: Los pacientes recibieron golimumab 50 mg subcutáneo una vez al mes durante 6 meses. El criterio de valoración principal fue el porcentaje con respuesta DAS28-VSG EULAR buena o moderada tras 6 meses de tratamiento. Resultados: Se incluyó a 140 pacientes. El 76,4% tenía enfermedad muy activa (DAS28-VSG > 5,1). El 76,4% estaba tomando metotrexato, el 40,0% otros FAME en monoterapia o combinación, y el 65,0% esteroides. Al mes 6, el 82,9% de los pacientes logró una respuesta EULAR buena o moderada, el 41,4% alcanzó baja actividad y el 30,7% remisión. El porcentaje de pacientes con respuesta al mes de la primera dosis administrada fue del 69,3%. La eficacia fue similar en pacientes tratados con metotrexato u otro FAME, distintas dosis de metotrexato, con/sin esteroides o que habían fallado a uno o más FAME. El golimumab fue bien tolerado y el perfil de seguridad fue coherente con estudios previos. Se comunicaron acontecimientos adversos graves en 11 pacientes (7,9%). Conclusión: La adición de golimumab 50 mg subcutáneo mensual a distintos FAME en pacientes con AR activa deparó una respuesta moderada o buena a los 6 meses en el 82,9%. La respuesta comenzó a observarse tempranamente, ya al inicio del mes 2, tras una única dosis de golimumab (AU)

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of golimumab in the 140 patients included in Spain as the first part of the GO-MORE trial, a multinational study involving patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with different disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients and methods: The patients received subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg once a month during 6 months. The primary endpoint was the percentage of individuals with a good or moderate EULAR DAS28- ESR response after 6 months of treatment. Results: A total of 140 patients were included. Of these, 76.4% had very active disease (DAS28-ESR > 5.1). 76.4% were taking methotrexate, 40.0% other DMARDs in monotherapy or combined, and 65.0% received corticosteroids. After 6 months, 82.9% of the patients showed a good or moderate EULAR response, 41.4% had low disease activity, and 30.7% were in remission. The percentage of responders one month after the first dose was 69.3%. The efficacy was similar in patients treated with methotrexate or other DMARDs, with different methotrexate doses, with or without corticosteroids, or in subjects who had failed one or more DMARDs. The response to golimumab was observed from the first dose. Golimumab was well tolerated and its safety profile was consistent with the findings of previous studies. Serious adverse events were reported in 11 patients (7.9%). Conclusion: The addition of subcutaneous golimumab 50 mg once a month to different DMARDs in patients with active RA yielded a moderate or good response after 6 months in 82.9% of the cases. The response was observed early, from the start of the second month, after a single dose of golimumab (AU)

New drugs from ancient natural foods. Oleocanthal, the natural occurring spicy compound of olive oil: a brief history.

Extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO), a principal component of the Mediterranean diet (Med diet), is one of the most ancient known foods and has long been associated with health benefits. Many phenolic compounds extracted from Olea europea L. have attracted attention since their discovery. Among these phenolic constituents, oleocanthal has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic molecule for different diseases, showing relevant pharmacological properties in various pathogenic processes, including inflammation, cancers and neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we discuss and summarize the most recent pharmacological evidence for the medical relevance of oleocanthal, focusing our attention on its anti-inflammatory and chemotherapeutic roles.

Lysophosphatidic acid receptor inhibition as a new multipronged treatment for rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor inhibition in a mouse model of autoantibody-mediated arthritis. METHODS: Arthritis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by K/BxN serum transfer. Arthritic mice were treated with the LPA receptor antagonist, Ki16425 and arthritis severity was assessed clinically and histologically. Expression of inflammatory mediators in joints was identified by a mouse cytokine array and validated by western blot and real-time PCR assays. Effects of treatment with LPA receptor antagonist or with small interfering RNA on bone metabolism were assessed by in vitro assays of osteoclastogenesis, bone resorption, osteoblasts differentiation and bone mineralisation. RESULTS: Mice treated with the LPA receptor antagonist Ki16425 showed attenuated arthritis characterised by reduction of synovial inflammation, cartilage damage and, more markedly, bone erosion. We detected increased apoptosis, reduction of inflammatory mediators and of bone remodelling proteins in arthritic joints from mice treated with Ki16425. In addition, we demonstrated that inhibition or suppression of LPA1 receptor reduces osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption and, on the contrary, it promotes differentiation of osteoblasts and bone mineralisation. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological inhibition of LPA1 receptor in the K/BxN serum-transfer arthritis model led to reduction of severity of arthritis involving multiple mechanisms, increased apoptosis, reduced inflammatory mediators and proteins involved in bone remodelling, that show LPA1 as a very promising target in rheumatoid arthritis treatment.

Novel factors as therapeutic targets to treat diabetes. Focus on leptin and ghrelin.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is the major cause of type 2 diabetes. In the mid 1990s interest in adipose tissue was revived by the discovery of leptin. The association of obesity and diabetes emphasizes their shared physiopathological features. At the end of the 1990s, ghrelin, a potent gastric orexigenic factor, was found to be involved in obesity. Leptin and ghrelin have opposite actions in several tissues including the regulation of feeding in the brain. OBJECTIVE/METHODS: To survey the role of leptin and ghrelin in glucose metabolism. We summarize the current state of research and discuss the roles of ghrelin and leptin in glucose homeostases and the potential application of drugs targeting leptin and ghrelin signalling to prevent and treat diabetes. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: A pressing challenge is to determine how leptin, ghrelin and other adipokines or gastric factors are involved in metabolic disorders. Answering these questions will require the development of new pharmacological tools that target specific adipokine systems. Hopefully, new therapeutic targets will be identified.

Interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab reduces disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: the tocilizumab in combination with traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of the humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab combined with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A total of 1,220 patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) in the phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter TOWARD (Tocilizumab in Combination With Traditional DMARD Therapy) study. Patients remained on stable doses of DMARDs and received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg or placebo (control group) every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. RESULTS: At week 24, the proportion of patients achieving a response according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) was significantly greater in the tocilizumab plus DMARD group than in the control group (61% versus 25%; P<0.0001). Secondary end points including 50% or 70% improvement (ACR50/70), the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), DAS28 remission responses (DAS28<2.6), European League Against Rheumatism responses, and systemic markers such as the C-reactive protein and hemoglobin levels showed superiority of tocilizumab plus DMARDs over DMARDs alone. Seventy-three percent of patients in the tocilizumab group had >or=1 adverse event (AE), compared with 61% of patients in the control group. AEs leading to withdrawal from the study were infrequent (4% of patients in the tocilizumab group and 2% of those in the control group). Serious AEs occurred in 6.7% and 4.3% of patients in the tocilizumab and control groups, respectively, and serious infections occurred in 2.7% and 1.9%, respectively. Elevations in the alanine aminotransferase level, from normal at baseline to >3-fold the upper limit of normal, occurred in 4% of patients in the tocilizumab group and 1% of those in the control group, and elevated total cholesterol levels were observed in 23% and 6% of patients, respectively. Sixteen patients started lipid-lowering therapy during the study. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 3.7% of patients receiving tocilizumab and none of the patients in the control group, and no grade 4 neutropenia was reported. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab combined with any of the DMARDs evaluated was safe and effective in reducing articular and systemic symptoms in patients with an inadequate response to these agents.