The Prevalence of Dietary Supplement Usage in Military Aviators.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of dietary supplement (DS) and energy drink (ED) usage in military personnel differs from branch to branch and is between 55% and 76% (higher values in special operations forces). Aviators with highly demanding tasks might be especially interested in using dietary supplements. To date, there are only limited data available for this special profession inside the military. METHODS: An internet-based survey was conducted on the prevalence of DS and ED usage, the reasons for their usage and the place of purchase for all wings of the German Armed Forces. RESULTS: Of the 181 pilots who participated in the survey, 34% used DSs and 16% EDs. Usage was linked to sports activities but not to the type of aircraft. DSs were purchased on the internet by 50% of the respondents; mostly protein supplements, magnesium and omega-3fatty acids. Only 42% said they would feel an effect from taking DSs. CONCLUSIONS: Although the present study showed that the prevalence of usage was comparable to that of the civilian population, the sources of supply and the range of the substances taken give cause for concern. This calls for education and information campaigns to make the pilots aware of the possible risks to their health.

Association of circulating factor seven activating protease (FSAP) and of oral Omega-3 fatty acids supplements with clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation: the OMEGA-AF study.

Factor VII Activating Protease (FSAP) activates factor VII (FVII) as well as pro-urokinase (uPA). Our goal was to evaluate the relation between plasma levels of FSAP and clinical instability in atrial fibrillation (AF) and possible effects of oral omega-3 fatty acids (FA) supplements. 101 patients with persistent AF were analyzed in the OMEGA-AF Study. Plasma FSAP levels were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment with omega-3 FA. The median FSAP antigen concentration, in contrast to FSAP activity, was higher in patients with persistent AF. The maintenance of SR after successful cardioversion (CV) did not lead to a normalization of FSAP concentration. Supplementation with omega-3 FA but not placebo significantly reduced elevated FSAP concentration. Furthermore, elevated FSAP levels did not indicate a significantly increased risk of recurrence of AF after electrical CV or cardiovascular clinical events during 1 year of follow-up. Plasma FSAP concentration was increased in patients with AF and may be involved in the pathogenesis of this condition. The possible effects of omega-3 FA on clinical AF potential could be linked with modulation of circulating FSAP levels.

Omega-3 Fatty acids and vitamin d in cardiology.

Dietary modification and supplementation play an increasingly important role in the conservative treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current interest has focused on n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and vitamin D. Clinical trial results on this subject are contradictory in many aspects. Several studies indicate that n-3 PUFA consumption improves vascular and cardiac hemodynamics, triglycerides, and possibly endothelial function, autonomic control, inflammation, thrombosis, and arrhythmia. Experimental studies show effects on membrane structure and associated functions, ion channel properties, genetic regulation, and production of anti-inflammatory mediators. Clinical trials evaluating a possible reduction in cardiovascular disease by n-3 PUFA have shown different results. Supplementation of vitamin D is common regarding prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. But vitamin D also seems to have several effects on the cardiovascular system. Vitamin D deficiency appears to be related to an increase in parathyroid hormone levels and can predispose to essential hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, increased insulin resistance, and eventually to atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular events. Randomized prospective clinical trials are needed to determine whether vitamin D and omega-3 FA supplementation therapy should be recommended as a routine therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Prospective randomized comparison of two defibrillation safety margins in unipolar, active pectoral defibrillator therapy.

Various techniques are used to establish defibrillation efficacy and to evaluate defibrillation safety margins in patients with an ICD. In daily practice a safety margin of 10 J is generally accepted. However, this is based on old clinical data and there are no data on safety margins using current ICD technology with unipolar, active pectoral defibrillators. Therefore, a randomized study was performed to test if the likelihood of successful defibrillation at defibrillation energy requirement (DER) + 5 J and + 10 J is equivalent. Ninety-six patients (86 men; age 61.0 +/- 10.3 years; ejection fraction 0.341 +/- 0.132; coronary artery disease [n = 65], dilated cardiomyopathy [n = 18], other [n = 13]) underwent implantation of an active pectoral ICD system with unidirectional current pathway and a truncated, fixed tilt biphasic shock waveform. The defibrillation energy requirement (DER) was determined with the use of a step-down protocol (delivered energy 15, 10, 8, 6, 4, 3, 2 J). The patients were then randomized to three inductions of ventricular fibrillation at implantation and three at predischarge testing with shock strengths programmed to DER + 5 J at implantation and + 10 J at predischarge testing or vice versa. The mean DER in the total study population was 7.88 +/- 2.96 J. The number of defibrillation attempts was 288 for + 5 J and 288 for + 10 J. The rate of successful defibrillation was 94.1% (DER + 5 J) and 98.9% (DER + 10 J; P < 0.01 for equivalence). Charge times for DER + 5 J were significantly shorter than for DER + 10 J (3.65 +/- 1.14 vs 5.45 +/- 1.47 s; P < 0.001). A defibrillation safety margin of DER + 5 J is associated with a defibrillation probability equal to the standard DER + 10 J. In patients in whom short charge times are critical for avoidance of syncope, a safety margin of DER + 5 J seems clinically safe for programming of the first shock energy.