Comparison of the utility of the PHQ and CES-D for depression screening among youth with HIV in an integrated care setting.

BACKGROUND: Depressive symptoms are well documented among people living with HIV and some evidence suggests that youth living with HIV (YLWH) are more affected than their adult counterparts. Therefore, screening for depression is imperative among YLWH to ensure optimal health. The objective of this study is to compare the utility of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) as depression screeners in an integrated care setting serving YLWH in the southeastern United States. METHODS: As a part of standard care, the CES-D and the PHQ were administered to YLWH. A Retrospective review of patient records was conducted. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and reports from mental health providers, researchers compared the utility of the screeners. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 121 cases from 2017. Youth ranged in age from 12-25 (M = 20.68, SD = 2.75). Most were Black/African American (59.5%) males (56.2%) who acquired HIV behaviorally (51.2%). Sexual orientation was nearly evenly split between heterosexual (37.2%) and homosexual (34.7%). The CES-D demonstrated higher specificity and sensitivity for identifying clinical depression, yet, this was not significantly different from the PHQ, p = .09. LIMITATIONS: Generalizability of findings may be limited as the study sample included youth from a single integrated care setting. CONCLUSION: Both the PHQ and the CES-D demonstrate utility for depression screening among YLWH. However, the PHQ may be preferable for use within a clinical setting.

Psychological factors related to resilience and vulnerability among youth with HIV in an integrated care setting.

Approximately 22% of HIV diagnoses in 2015 occurred among youth aged 13-24. Much is known about the risk factors and psychopathology present in youth living with HIV (YLWH), however, relatively little is known about resiliency in this population. The current study sought to assess factors related to resilience and vulnerability among YLWH as well as the impact of psychosocial factors on these constructs using existing clinical data from an integrated care clinic serving YLWH in the southeastern United States. Data included findings from mental health screeners administered as part of the standard protocol of care for youth aged 13-24 including information about anxiety (GAD-7), post-traumatic stress disorder (PC-PTSD), depression (PHQ-A or PHQ-9), substance use (CRAFFT), and medication adherence (BEHKA-HIV Action subscale) as well as viral load and demographic variables. Hierarchical linear regression was used to determine factors related to biological (viral load) and behavioral indicators of resilience and vulnerability (BEHKA-HIV Action subscale and CRAFFT). Results showed that anxiety was a significant covariate of both biological and behavioral indicators of resilience while gender was a significant factor associated with behavioral indicators of vulnerability. None of the psychological or demographic factors examined in this study were associated with substance use, a behavioral indicator of vulnerability and resilience. Our results support the need for clinicians to screen for and monitor anxiety symptoms among YLWH in integrated care settings in an effort to promote resilience and minimize vulnerability. Practical, evidence-based strategies should be applied in clinical settings to address medication adherence and anxiety among YLWH.