Genomic Risk Predicts Molecular Imaging-detected Metastatic Nodal Disease in Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Decipher genomic classifier (GC) is increasingly being used to determine metastasis risk in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Whether GCs predict for the presence of occult metastatic disease at presentation or subsequent metastatic progression is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if GC scores predict extraprostatic 68Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA-11) positron emission tomography (PET) positivity at presentation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between December 2015 and September 2018, 91 PCa patients with both GC scores and pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans were identified. Risk stratification was performed using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA), and GC scores. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Logistic regression was used to identify factors correlated with PSMA-positive disease. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The NCCN criteria identified 23 (25.3%) and 68 patients (74.7%) as intermediate and high risk, while CAPRA scores revealed 28 (30.8%) and 63 (69.2%) as low/intermediate and high risk, respectively. By contrast, only 45 patients (49.4%) had high-risk GC scores. PSMA-avid pelvic nodal involvement was identified in 27 patients (29.7%). Higher GC score was significantly associated with pelvic nodal involvement (odds ratio [OR] 1.38 per 0.1 units; p=0.009) and any PSMA-avid nodal involvement (pelvic or distant; OR 1.40 per 0.1 units; p=0.007). However, higher GC score was not significantly associated with PSMA-avid osseous metastases (OR 1.11 per 0.1 units; p=0.50). Limitations include selection bias for patients able to receive both tests and the sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Each 0.1-unit increase in GC score was associated with an approximate 40% increase in the odds of PSMA-avid lymph node involvement. These data suggest that patients with GC high risk might benefit from more nodal imaging and treatment intensification, potentially via pelvic nodal dissection, pelvic nodal irradiation, and/or the addition of chemohormonal agents. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with higher genomic classifier scores were found to have more metastatic lymph node involvement on prostate-specific membrane antigen imaging.

Location of Recurrence by Gallium-68 PSMA-11 PET Scan in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Salvage Radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify locations of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <2 by Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging, and to determine whether standard nodal radiation fields would cover the location of prostate cancer recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with PSMA-PET imaging for biochemical recurrence following RP with PSA ≤2.0 ng/mL and assessed if the recurrent disease was within standard radiation target volumes. We compared patient and clinical variables between men with recurrences covered by standard salvage radiation fields and those with recurrences outside of standard fields. RESULTS: We identified 125 patients for study inclusion. The median PSA at imaging was 0.40 ng/mL (interquartile range 0.28-0.63). PSMA-avid disease was found in 66 patients (53%). Of these, 25 patients (38%) had PSMA-avid lesions found outside of the pelvis, 33 (50%) had lesions confined to the pelvic lymph nodes and prostate bed, and 8 (12%) men had PSMA-avid recurrence only in the prostate bed. Salvage radiation including standard Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) pelvic nodal volumes would not cover PSMA-avid nodal disease in 38 men (30%). PSA at the time of imaging was statistically associated with having PSMA-avid disease outside of standard nodal fields (P <.01). CONCLUSION: The 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET detects disease in a majority of patients with PSA ≤2.0 following RP. Nearly one-third of men had PSMA-avid disease that would be missed by standard radiation fields. This imaging modality may dramatically impact the design and use of post-RP salvage radiotherapy.

A novel urethral sparing technique for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy after transurethral resection of the prostate.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess retrospectively the variability of the urethral dose optimized using a Foley catheter versus urethral contrast injected using a new modified triple-lumen catheter, in CT-based high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy of posttransurethral resection of prostate (TURP) patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At our institution, there were six post-TURP patients with prostate carcinoma between July 2014 and April 2016 who underwent transperineal interstitial HDR brachytherapy (16 needles). A custom modified triple-lumen catheter was placed to inject contrast into the TURP defect. Three-dimensional optimal plans using inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm was generated according to radiation therapy oncology group dose requirements. Alternative plans were retroactively generated for comparison using standard technique based on a Foley catheter as a urethral constraint volume for each patient with the same weighting factors. We compared the dosimetry parameters in each planning using Wilcoxon's ranked sum nonparametric test. RESULTS: The median followup of all patients was 17.5 months. No significant genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity was noted using this technique. In the dosimetric analysis, the prostate V100 values and TURP urethral V100 were significantly different between plans with and without the contrast (V100 [mean]: 92.4 [%] vs. 94.4 [%], p = 0.046; TURP UV100 [mean]: 1.4 cc vs. 2.2 cc, p = 0.028). There were no statistical differences in the mean values of planning target volume V150%, V200%, and D90, and each bladder V75 and rectum V75. CONCLUSIONS: Post-TURP HDR brachytherapy with urethral contrast showed significantly more volume effect of the TURP defect than that with a Foley catheter alone. Better visualization of the TURP defect should lead to more accurate urethral sparing administration of HDR brachytherapy which is necessary to prevent urethral complication.