Results of a phase III prospective, randomised trial, comparing mitoxantrone and vinorelbine (MV) in combination with standard FAC/FEC in front-line therapy of metastatic breast cancer.

This comparative phase III trial of mitoxantrone+vinorelbine (MV) versus 5-fluorouracil+cyclophosphamide+either doxorubicin or epirubicin (FAC/FEC) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was conducted to determine whether MV would produce equivalent efficacy, while resulting in an improved tolerance in relation to alopecia and nausea/vomiting. This multicentre study recruited and randomised 281 patients with metastatic breast cancer; 280 were evaluable for response survival and toxicity (138 received FAC/FEC, 142 received MV). Patient characteristics were matched in each arm and stratification for prior exposure to adjuvant therapy was made prospectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was equivalent in the two arms (33.3% for FAC/FEC versus 34.5% for MV), but MV was more effective in patients who had received prior adjuvant therapy (13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 3-23) for FAC/FEC versus 33% (95% CI 20-47) for MV P=0.025) with a better progression-free survival (PFS) (5 months (range 1-18 months) versus 8 months (range 1-27 months); P=0.0007 for FAC/FEC versus MV, respectively) while FAC/FEC was more effective in previously untreated patients (ORR 43% (95% CI 33-53) versus 35% (95% CI 25-45), P=0.26; PFS 9 months (range 0-29 months) versus 6 months (range 0-26 months) P=0.014). Toxicity was monitored through the initial six cycles of therapy; febrile neutropenia and delayed haematological recovery was more frequent for MV (P=0.001), while nausea/vomiting of grades 3-4 was greater for FAC/FEC (P=0.031), as was alopecia (P=0.0001), cardiotoxicity was the same for the two regimens. MV represents a chemotherapy combination with equivalent efficacy to standard FAC/FEC and improved results for patients who have previously received adjuvant chemotherapy. Toxicity must be balanced to allow for increased haematological suppression and risk of febrile neutropenia with MV compared with a higher risk of subjectively unpleasant side-effects such as nausea/vomiting and alopecia with FAC/FEC.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed, where feasible, by surgery for cancer of the esophagus.

PURPOSE: To conduct a multicenter phase II study of a concomitant combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery, where feasible, in patients with nonmetastatic esophageal tumor, stratified on operability at diagnosis. METHODS: Each cycle consisted of fluorouracil (5FU) 800 mg/m2/d by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1 to 5, cisplatin (CDDP) 50 mg/m2/d IV bolus on days 1 and 8, hydroxyurea (HU) 1.5 or 2 g/d orally on days 8 to 12 and concomitant radiotherapy 20 Gy in 10 fractions over 12 days. All patients were to receive two cycles on days 1 and 22. If feasible, surgery was performed 3 to 6 weeks after cycle two completion. Otherwise, a third cycle was administered. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included between September 1990 and September 1993. Of the 47 operable patients, 41 (87%) underwent surgery and 38 (81%) had a complete resection. No residual primary tumor was found in the surgical specimen in 17 cases (36%), and only microscopic foci in 13 (28%). Two-year overall and disease-free survival probabilities were 51% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 37 to 65) and 43% (95% CI, 28 to 57), respectively. Among the 41 inoperable patients, 12 (29%) became operable. Seven (17%) had complete resection, two incomplete resection, and three exploratory surgery. Two-year overall and disease-free survival probabilities were 29% (95% CI, 15 to 43) and 27% (95% CI, 13 to 40), respectively. Five deaths occurred during chemoradiotherapy, six postoperatively and four in patients with evidence of cancer. Five late complications (one myelopathy) were observed. CONCLUSION: Despite a high histologic response rate in initially operable patients, overall survival was similar to that observed in other preoperative chemoradiation series because of substantial toxicity.

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS: Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION: CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Treatment of inflammatory breast cancer with combination chemotherapy and mastectomy versus breast conservation.

Twenty-six consecutive patients with nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), were treated in a single institution using the same protocol, and all were followed for at least 48 months. The first phase of treatment consisted of two monthly cycles of combination chemotherapy with Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), vincristine, cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil. Local treatment was then undertaken using in all cases a cobalt 60 beam to deliver 45 Gy to the entire mammary gland and lymph-draining areas. Local treatment was completed either by mastectomy, or by conservation of the breast and interstitial irradiation of the primary tumor site. Chemotherapy was resumed after completion of local treatment for a total of 6 cycles. Metastatic disease occurred in 19 of 26 patients from 8 to 55 months; five patients are alive and free of disease from 48 to 81 months. Failure to control local disease or local recurrences was noted in two of ten patients undergoing mastectomy, and in seven of 13 patients with conservation of the breast. While this difference is not statistically significant we concluded that methods of breast conservation which limit the high dose volume to the tumor site do not assure local control in IBC. The median disease-free survival and overall survival of 12 and 31 months, respectively, are not satisfactory. Better systemic treatment is needed.