Electrogram morphology discriminators in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A comparative evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Morphology algorithms are currently recommended as a standalone discriminator in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, these proprietary algorithms differ in both design and nominal programming. OBJECTIVE: To compare three different algorithms with nominal versus advanced programming in their ability to discriminate between ventricular (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). METHODS: In nine European centers, VT and SVTs were collected from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic dual- and triple-chamber ICDs via their respective remote monitoring portals. Percentage morphology matches were recorded for selected episodes which were classified as VT or SVT by means of atrioventricular comparison. The sensitivity and related specificity of each manufacturer discriminator was determined at various values of template match percentage from receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 534 episodes were retained for the analysis. In ROC analyses, Abbott Far Field MD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.91; P < .001) and Boston Scientific RhythmID (AUC: 0.95; P < .001) show higher AUC than Medtronic Wavelet (AUC: 0.81; P < .001) when tested for their ability to discriminate VT from SVT. At nominal % match threshold all devices provided high sensitivity in VT identification, (91%, 100%, and 90%, respectively, for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic) but contrasted specificities in SVT discrimination (85%, 41%, and 62%, respectively). Abbott and Medtronic's nominal thresholds were similar to the optimal thresholds. Optimization of the % match threshold improved the Boston Scientific specificity to 79% without compromising the sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Proprietary morphology discriminators show important differences in their ability to discriminate SVT. How much this impact the overall discrimination process remains to be investigated.

Left ventricular endocardial stimulation for severe heart failure.

Biventricular resynchronization, a therapy recommended for patients presenting with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and ventricular dyssynchrony, requires the implantation of an LV lead, usually placed in a lateral or posterolateral tributary of the coronary sinus. Despite important progress made in the development of dedicated instrumentation, the procedure remains sometimes challenging and unsuccessful in a minority of patients. In the rare instances of unsuccessful transvenous implantations occurring in the presence of major surgical contraindications, a few operators have implanted the LV lead transseptally, an approach limited by technical difficulties and by the thromboembolic risk associated with the presence of a lead inside the LV cavity. The interest in this approach was recently renewed by 2 studies in an animal model and in humans, respectively, which both found a distinctly superior hemodynamic performance associated with endocardial compared with epicardial stimulation. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of LV endocardial stimulation, examines the various techniques of LV endocardial stimulation, and projects their future applications in light of these highly promising recent results. The implementation of endocardial stimulation will ultimately depend on: 1) the development of safe, effective, and durable instrumentation, and reliable and reproducible intraprocedural methods to identify the optimal site of stimulation; and 2) the completion of controlled trials confirming the superiority of this technique compared with standard cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Electrophysiologic and clinical consequences of linear catheter ablation to transect the anterior left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and outcome of ablation to transect the anterior left atrium (LA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: While the Maze procedure is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF, it is associated with significant morbidity. This prospective clinical study evaluates the feasibility and consequences of limited LA linear ablation to transect the anterior LA in patients with AF. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (51.2 +/- 7.3 years) with paroxysmal (n = 16) or chronic (n = 8) AF resistant to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation were studied. To transect the anterior LA, linear ablation was performed joining the superior PVs; this line was then connected to the anterior mitral annulus. Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation were performed in all cases. Ablation was performed using an irrigated catheter with the endpoint of achieving complete linear block demonstrated by online double potentials, differential pacing techniques, and an activation detour. RESULTS: Of 20 patients in AF prior to linear ablation, arrhythmia terminated in 12 (60%), including half the patients with chronic AF, during ablation. Despite repeated ablation, complete linear block was achieved in only 14 of 24 patients (58%). Complete linear conduction block resulted in an activation detour around the mitral annulus and PVs with a delay of 158 +/- 30 ms (P = .0001), significantly delayed activation of the lateral LA with prolongation of P-wave duration (P = .002), and characteristic change in P-wave morphology during sinus rhythm (P = .002). Of the 14 with anterior LA transection, 4 (29%) have had regular atrial tachycardias due to macroreentry through recovered gaps. Nine of these 14 (64%) have remained arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmics compared to 3 of 10 (30%) with incomplete block at 28 +/- 4 months following their last procedure (P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of catheter ablation to transect the anterior LA in humans. While being effective in the termination of AF, this configuration of linear lesions is technically challenging to complete, results in significant delayed LA activation, and is associated with modest long-term arrhythmia suppression.

Reverse remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with prolonged sinus pauses.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic prolonged sinus pauses on termination of atrial fibrillation (AF) are an indication for pacemaker implantation. We evaluated sinus node function and clinical outcome in patients with prolonged sinus pauses on termination of arrhythmia who underwent ablation of paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with paroxysmal AF and prolonged sinus pauses (> or =3 seconds) on termination of AF underwent ablation between May 1995 and November 2002. Patients with sinus pauses independent of episodes of AF were excluded from the analysis. The procedure included pulmonary vein and linear atrial ablation. After ablation, sinus node function was assessed during the first week and at 1, 3, and 6 months, by 24-hour ambulatory monitoring to determine the mean heart rate and heart rate range, and by exercise testing to determine the maximal heart rate. Corrected sinus node recovery time was determined at the completion of ablation and at 24.0+/-11.3 months at 600 and 400 ms. After AF ablation, there was a significant improvement of sinus node function, with an increase in the mean heart rate (P=0.001), maximal heart rate (P<0.0001), and heart rate range (P<0.0001). The corrected sinus node recovery time decreased in all patients evaluated at 600 ms (P=0.016) and 400 ms (P=0.019). At 26.0+/-17.6 months, 18 patients (85%) had no recurrence of AF (in the absence of medication), with no symptoms attributable to bradycardia or sinus pauses on ambulatory monitoring. Two patients had infrequent episodes of AF, 1 requiring pacemaker implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged sinus pauses after paroxysms of AF may result from depression of sinus node function that can be eliminated by curative ablation of AF. This is accompanied by improvement in parameters of sinus node function, suggesting reverse remodeling of the sinus node.

Mapping and ablation of ventricular fibrillation associated with long-QT and Brugada syndromes.

BACKGROUND: The long-QT and Brugada syndromes are important substrates of malignant ventricular arrhythmia. The feasibility of mapping and ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in these conditions has not been reported. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven patients (4 men; age, 38+/-7 years; 4 with long-QT and 3 with Brugada syndrome) with episodes of ventricular fibrillation or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and frequent isolated or repetitive premature beats were studied. These premature beats were observed to trigger ventricular arrhythmias and were localized by mapping the earliest endocardial activity. In 4 patients, premature beats originated from the peripheral right (1 Brugada) or left (3 long-QT) Purkinje conducting system and were associated with variable Purkinje-to-muscle conduction times (30 to 110 ms). In the remaining 3 patients, premature beats originated from the right ventricular outflow tract, being 25 to 40 ms ahead of the QRS. The accuracy of mapping was confirmed by acute elimination of premature beats after 12+/-6 minutes of radiofrequency applications. During a follow-up of 17+/-17 months using ambulatory monitoring and defibrillator memory interrogation, no patients had recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia but 1 had persistent premature beats. CONCLUSIONS: Triggers from the Purkinje arborization or the right ventricular outflow tract have a crucial role in initiating ventricular fibrillation associated with the long-QT and Brugada syndromes. These can be eliminated by focal radiofrequency ablation.

Comparison of permanent left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and chronic atrial fibrillation: a prospective hemodynamic study.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular pacing (LVP) and biventricular pacing (BVP) have been proposed as treatments for patients with advanced heart failure complicated by discoordinate contraction due to intraventricular conduction delay. For patients in sinus rhythm, BVP works in part by modulating the electronic atrial-ventricular time delay and thus optimizing contractile synchrony, the contribution of atrial systole, and reducing mitral regurgitation. However, little is known of the mechanisms of BVP in heart failure patients with drug-resistant chronic atrial fibrillation. HYPOTHESIS AND METHODS: LVP differs from BVP because hemodynamic and clinical improvement occurs in association with prolongation rather than shortening of the QRS duration. We sought to determine if LVP or BVP improves mechanical synchronization in the presence of atrial fibrillation. Thirteen patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, severe heart failure and QRS >or=140 ms received (after His bundle ablation) a pacemaker providing both LVP and BVP. The mean age was 62 +/- 6 years and left ventricular ejection fraction was 24 +/- 8%. After a baseline phase of one month with right ventricular pacing, all patients underwent in random order 2 phases of 2 months (LVP and BVP). At the end of each phase, an echocardiogram, a hemodynamic analysis at rest and during a 6-minute walking test and a cardio-pulmonary exercise test were performed. RESULTS: LVP and BVP provided similar performances at rest (p = ns). The 6-minute walking test revealed similar performances in both pacing modes but patients were significantly more symptomatic at the end of the test with LVP ( p = 0.035). The cardio-pulmonary exercise test showed higher performances with BVP (92 +/- 34 Watts) vs. LVP (77 +/- 23; p = 0.03). LVP was associated with significantly more premature ventricular complexes recorded during the 6 minute walking test (49 +/- 71) than BVP (10 +/- 23; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this small series of patients with atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and a prolonged QRS duration, LVP and BVP provided similar hemodynamic effects at rest whereas BVP was associated with better hemodynamic effects during exercise and fewer premature ventricular complexes. Although the mechanisms for the observed differences are uncertain, it is possible that there is worsening of right ventricular function due to a rise in left-to-right electromechanical delay during exercise. Increased catecholamines release might contribute to the lower exercise tolerance and greater number of premature ventricular complexes recorded during exercise observed during LVP compared to BVP. RECOMMENDATIONS: Patients with atrial fibrillation, heart failure and QRS prolongation who are candidates for His-bundle ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy may respond better to BVP rather than to LVP.

Distinctive electrophysiological properties of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently initiated from pulmonary veins (PVs), but little is known of the electrophysiological properties of PVs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two groups were studied: 28 patients (49+/-13 years old) with paroxysmal AF and 20 control patients (49+/-14 years old) without AF. Effective and functional refractory period and conduction time from PV to left atrium (LA) were compared in the 2 groups by use of programmed stimulation with a single extrastimulus in the PVs and LA. In the AF group, the venous effective refractory periods (ERPs) were shorter than that of the LA: 185+/-71 versus 253+/-21 ms, P<0.001, whereas in the control group, they were longer (282+/-45 versus 253+/-41 ms, P=0.009). The venous ERPs and functional refractory periods in patients with AF were also shorter than that observed in control subjects (185+/-71 versus 282+/-45 ms and 210+/-77 versus 315+/-43 ms, respectively, P<0.001), whereas LA ERPs were not significantly different. Decremental conduction in PVs was more frequent (93% versus 56%, P=0.01) and had a greater increment (102+/-65 versus 42+/-40 ms, P<0.001) in patients with AF. Finally, AF was more frequently induced when pacing was performed in PVs (22 of 90) versus LA (1 of 81) in patients with AF (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The PVs of patients with AF exhibited distinctive electrophysiological properties, which were strikingly different from those of patients devoid of AF, potentially explaining their arrhythmogenicity.