The challenge of care coordination by midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national descriptive survey.

BACKGROUND: As part of a decades-long process of restructuring primary care, independent (also known as community) healthcare workers are being encouraged to work in groups to facilitate their coordination and continuity of care in France. French independent midwives perform about half of the early prenatal interviews that identify mothers' needs during pregnancy and then refer them to the appropriate resources. The French government, however, structured the COVID-19 pandemic response around public health institutions and did not directly mobilise these community healthcare workers during the lockdown phase. These responses have raised questions about their role within the healthcare system in crises. This survey's main objectives were to estimate the proportion of independent midwives who experienced new difficulties in referring women to healthcare facilities or other caregivers and in collaborating with hospitals during the first stage of this pandemic. The secondary objective was to estimate the proportion, according to their mode of practice, of independent midwives who considered that all the women under their care had risked harm due to failed or delayed referral to care. METHODS: We conducted an online national survey addressed to independent midwives in France from 29 April to 15 May 2020, around the end of the first lockdown (17 March-11 May, 2020). RESULTS: Of the 5264 registered independent midwives in France, 1491 (28.3%) responded; 64.7% reported new or greater problems during the pandemic in referring women to health facilities or care-providers, social workers in particular, and 71.0% reported new difficulties collaborating with hospitals. Nearly half (46.2%) the respondents considered that all the women in their care had experienced, to varying degrees, a lack of or delay in care that could have affected their health. This proportion did not differ according to the midwives' form of practice: solo practice, group practice with other midwives only, or group practice with at least two types of healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic has degraded the quality of pregnant women's care in France and challenged the French model of care, which is highly compartmentalised between an almost exclusively independent primary care (community) sector and a predominantly salaried secondary care (hospital) sector.

How midwives implemented teleconsultations during the COVID-19 health crisis: a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary and secondary objectives were to measure and understand the determinants of independent midwives' implementation of teleconsultations and their intention to continue these in the future. DESIGN: A two-phase mixed-methods approach: (1) quantitative data to measure factors determining the initiation and continuation of teleconsultation, collected by an online survey from 29 April to 15 May 2020, at the end of the first COVID-19 lockdown, followed by (2) qualitative data to understand these determinants, by interviewing some participants in May-July 2020 to explore the quantitative findings in more detail. SETTING: Mainland France PARTICIPANTS: The target population comprised independent midwives currently practising in France. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary and secondary outcomes were binary variables: implementation of teleconsultations, and intention to continue them. The qualitative results provided the themes explaining these decisions. RESULTS: We obtained 1491 complete responses from independent midwives, that is, 28.3% of French independent midwives, and interviewed 22 volunteers among them. Among the 1491, 88.5% implemented teleconsultations and 65.8% intended to continue them. Both individual and organisational factors favoured implementation of teleconsultations: older age (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.58), female gender (aOR: 6.88, 95% CI: 2.71 to 17.48), married or living with a partner (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.52) and working in a group practice (midwives only-aOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.72; multiprofessional group-aOR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.16 to 2.64). The qualitative analysis did not identify any new factors but helped us to understand the satisfaction better: midwives adopted telemedicine for their patients' access to and continuity of care, to maintain their professional activity and income, and to limit the risks of infection. CONCLUSION: Personal and organisational factors motivated the implementation of teleconsultation during the pandemic, but maintaining it raises technical, regulatory, and ethical issues.

Experiences of teleconsultation by French liberal midwives during the COVID-19 crisis / Expériences de la téléconsultation par les sages-femmes libérales françaises pendant la crise du COVID-19

CONTEXT: In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the French government has authorized the practice of teleconsultations for midwives since March 20th. A questionnaire survey of 1491 liberal midwives reported that 88.5% of them had implemented this practice. We therefore wished to explore their motivations and the way in which they have integrated this new practice modality into their practice. METHODS: We conducted 22 semi-structured interviews with liberal midwives who had implemented teleconsultations since their authorization. The study was conducted between May and July 2020 and ended when saturation of the results was reached. A content analysis was used to identify recurrences and exceptions in the discourse. RESULTS: The main motivations of the liberal midwives for offering teleconsultations were to maintain access to care for women and their own professional activity. They pointed to a number of limitations, including the issue of professional secrecy and guaranteed confidentiality, and inequality of access to care in relation to the digital divide. The integration of teleconsultation into their practice has made it possible to highlight and enhance the support work carried out by midwives, which until now has not been very visible or recognized. CONCLUSION: Midwives quickly adopted teleconsultations, which have been made permanent since the confinement. This tool helps to ensure continuity of care but also raises new questions about equal access to care.

Contexte: Dans le contexte de la pandémie COVID-19, le gouvernement français a autorisé la pratique des téléconsultations pour les sages-femmes à partir du 20 mars 2020. Une enquête par questionnaire menée auprès de 1 491 sages-femmes libérales a rapporté que 88,5 % d'entre elles avaient mis en œuvre cette pratique. Nous avons donc souhaité explorer leurs motivations et la façon dont elles ont intégré cette nouvelle modalité d'exercice dans leur pratique. Méthodes: Nous avons mené 22 entretiens semi-directifs auprès de sages-femmes libérales ayant mis en place des téléconsultations depuis leur autorisation. L'étude, réalisée entre mai et juillet 2020, a pris fin lorsque la saturation des résultats a été atteinte. Une analyse de contenu a permis de dégager les récurrences et les exceptions dans le discours. Résultats: Les principales motivations des sages-femmes libérales à proposer des téléconsultations étaient de maintenir l'accès aux soins pour les femmes et préserver leur propre activité professionnelle. Elles pointaient un certain nombre de limites, parmi lesquelles la question du secret professionnel et de la garantie de la confidentialité, ou encore l'inégalité d'accès aux soins en lien avec la fracture numérique. L'intégration de la téléconsultation dans leur pratique a permis de mettre en lumière et valoriser le travail d'accompagnement réalisé par les sages-femmes jusqu'à présent peu visible et reconnu. Conclusion: Les sages-femmes se sont rapidement approprié les téléconsultations qui ont, depuis le confinement, été pérennisées. Cet outil permet une aide à la continuité des soins, mais pose également de nouvelles questions d'égalité d'accès aux soins.

Adaptation of independent midwives to the COVID-19 pandemic: A national descriptive survey.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this survey was to identify how independent midwives, mainly working in primary care, adapted their practices at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Our assumption was that this practice adaptation would vary according to both geographical area (timing of pandemic effect) and whether they practiced alone or in a group. DESIGN: We conducted an online national survey of independent midwives in France from March 16-23, 2020. SETTING: All districts in mainland France and the overseas territories. PARTICIPANTS: Respondents from the population of all independent midwives working in France. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of midwives reporting that they had adapted their practices to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rank, in order of frequency, of the postponed or cancelled activities. RESULTS: Of the 1517 midwives who responded, i.e., 20.3% of the independent midwives in France, 90.6% reported adapting one or more of their practices . The main adjustment was the postponement or cancellation of consultations deemed non-essential, listed in descending order: postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation (n = 1270, 83.7%), birth preparation (n = 1188, 78.3%), non-emergency preventive gynaecology consultation (n = 976, 64.3%), early prenatal interview (n = 170, 11.2%), and postnatal follow-up (n = 158, 10.4%). KEY CONCLUSIONS: Without guidelines, each midwife had to decide individually if and how to adapt her practice. Postpartum pelvic floor rehabilitation and birth preparation have been strongly affected. The results of this national survey indicate that a large majority of midwives have adapted their practices, independently of the local course of the pandemic, and that this reduction of contacts with women raises questions in this period of anxiety about intermediate-term adaptations to guarantee the continuity and safety of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study's results can be used to develop tools to handle cancelled consultations. Video, also called virtual, visits and coordination between independent practitioners and hospitals are probably the major challenges in the current context.