Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 25(4): 341-352, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781622

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has evolved and become more personalized during the past several years. For example, depotentiation/reduced duration of systemic therapies has proven to be beneficial in both advanced and early stages of the disease. RECENT FINDINGS: In particular, recent randomized studies of stage III and high-risk stage II CRC showed that a shorter duration (3 months), when compared to the historical 6-month comparator, provides nearly similar overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). In the setting of advanced, inoperable CRC, a relatively short induction phase (six to eight cycles) followed by biological agents is the current standard of care in RAS wild-type (wt). versus RAS mutated cases. With regard to potentially operable stage IV disease (with the aim of converting liver metastases to operability), a relatively short number of cycles (four to six cycles) should be offered with re-staging and re-evaluation for surgery as soon as possible in most cases. For inoperable liver metastases, a relatively intensive triplet or doublet plus targeted therapy may attain conversion in some cases and may even result in cure. Rectal cancer treatment continues to be a complex disease in terms of treatment and oncological results. Recent data seem to showcase the benefits of more prolonged sequential strategies (total neoadjuvant therapy, all treatment delivered before surgery, to reduce the risk of distant metastases and local control). In recent years, different strategies regarding treatment intensity have been employed in CRC in adjuvant and metastatic setting. Introduction of triplets as first-line therapy for colon cancer and as induction phase for rectal cancer are now therapeutic options. Conversely in stage II disease or low-risk stage III resected CRC, a reduced chemotherapy length is a new standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 34(23): 2721-7, 2016 08 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27298411

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial established perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy as a standard of care for patients with resectable esophagogastric cancer. However, identification of patients at risk for relapse remains challenging. We evaluated whether pathologic response and lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are prognostic in patients treated in the MAGIC trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathologic regression was assessed in resection specimens by two independent pathologists using the Mandard tumor regression grading system (TRG). Differences in overall survival (OS) according to TRG were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards method established the relationships among TRG, clinical-pathologic variables, and OS. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty resection specimens were analyzed. In chemotherapy-treated patients with a TRG of 1 or 2, median OS was not reached, whereas for patients with a TRG of 3, 4, or 5, median OS was 20.47 months. On univariate analysis, high TRG and lymph node metastases were negatively related to survival (Mandard TRG 3, 4, or 5: hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.39; P = .0209; lymph node metastases: HR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.88 to 7.0; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, only lymph node status was independently predictive of OS (HR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.70 to 6.63; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Lymph node metastases and not pathologic response to chemotherapy was the only independent predictor of survival after chemotherapy plus resection in the MAGIC trial. Prospective evaluation of whether omitting postoperative chemotherapy and/or switching to a noncross-resistant regimen in patients with lymph node-positive disease whose tumor did not respond to preoperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil may be appropriate.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasa Clase I , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Fosfohidrolasa PTEN/genética , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Tasa de Supervivencia , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA