Which Men Do or Do Not Achieve Long-Term Symptom Relief After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP): 11 Years of HoLEP Experience.

Purpose: Apart from the existing level-one evidence, few centers have reported on long-term outcomes after Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP). Against this backdrop we aimed to report on our treatment experience and identify predictors of persistent/recurrent lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after the procedure. Materials and Methods: From 2006 to 2017, 2566 men underwent HoLEP at our institution. Only patients with available, cross-sectional follow-up (F/u) ≥6 months were included. Perioperative and F/u characteristics were compared by duration of F/u in months (quartiles). Multivariable logistic regression models (MVAs) were used to identify predictors of persistent/recurring symptoms, defined as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) >7 at F/u. Results: A total of 774 patients with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 66-75), prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR = 60-105), American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2 (IQR = 2-3), IPSS of 19 (IQR = 14-24), and quality of life (QoL) of 4 (3-5) at the time of operation were analyzed. Median F/u was 52 months (IQR = 32-77), overall current median prostate-specific antigen was 0.91 mg/dL (0.5-1.8), median IPSS and QoL were 3 (IQR = 1-7) and 1 (IQR 0-2), respectively. LUTS medication was present in 20 patients (2.6%), 15 (2%) patients required reoperation, and permanent urinary incontinence was present in 17 (2.2%) patients. On MVA age at operation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.1; p = 0.013), prostate volume (OR = 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99;], p = 0.003), body mass index (OR = 1.06 [95% CI, 1.0-1.1], p = 0.043), presence of indwelling catheter (OR = 0.51 [95% CI, 0.32-0.81], p = 0.004), and anticholinergics before procedure (OR = 1.74 [95% CI, 1.01-3.0], p = 0.046) were predictors of persistent/recurring symptoms. Conclusions: Our HoLEP experience confirms durable and profound symptom relief in the vast majority men. A small fraction of patients complained about subjective persistent/recurring LUTS stressing the need for proper patient selection and timing of surgical intervention.

Assessing the Outcome of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate by Age, Prostate Volume, and a History of Blood Thinning Agents: Report from a Single-Center Series of >1800 Consecutive Cases.

Purpose: To assess perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a real-world scenario and with a focus on demanding patient factors, such as large prostate size, advanced patient age, and anticoagulation therapy (AT). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed HoLEP procedures at our institution between 2010 and 2016. After stratification by prostate volume, age, and AT, perioperative and early voiding characteristics were compared. A multivariable regression model was employed to identify predictors of prolonged time of catheterization (defined as being above group's median). Results: The study cohort consisted of 1816 men with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-76), a median prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR: 58-105), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 in 618 men (34%). Median time of enucleation and morcellation was 43 minutes (IQR: 31-60) and 10 minutes (IQR: 6-18), respectively. Perioperative blood transfusions were administered in 44 (2.4%) cases, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3b) occurred in 61 (3.3%) cases. The median time of catheterization was 2 days (IQR: 2-2), with prolonged catheterization occurring in 277 (15%) cases. After adjustment, large prostates (fourth volume quartile [106-280 mL]) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.6, p = 0.001), therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin bridging regimen (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4-3.6, p = 0.037), low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.2, p = 0.015), and a history of direct oral anticoagulation (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.0, p = 0.022), but not patient age, were independently associated with prolonged catheterization. Conclusions: We confirm HoLEP as safe and efficient; however, patients with large prostates and patients with a history of AT are at risk of prolonged catheterization.

Contemporary national trends in prostate cancer risk profile at diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic approaches have evolved away from aggressive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. While a goal of these changes is to decrease over diagnosis and treatment, little is known about the downstream effects on PCa risk distribution at the time of diagnosis. To better understand these effects, we used a national cohort of men to investigate temporal trends in PCa risk profile at diagnosis. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified men diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma (T1-4N0M0) from 2004 to 2014. We assessed temporal trends in proportional distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk groups as well as their sub-components (PSA, Gleason score, clinical T stage). We also evaluated trends in these sub-components among men with intermediate- and high-risk disease as well as those with metastatic disease. RESULTS: In our cohort of 755,567 men diagnosed between 2004 and 2014, there was a decrease in the proportion of men diagnosed with low-risk PCa (38.32 to 27.23%, p < 0.001) and a consequent increase in the proportion of localized intermediate-risk (40.49 to 46.72%, p < 0.001) and high-risk diagnoses (21.19 to 26.05%, p < 0.001). This was primarily driven by an increased proportion of Gleason 7 and Gleason 8-10 cancer, respectively. The number of men presenting with metastatic disease consistently increased from 3251 (2.88%) in 2004 to 6886 (7.19%) in 2014 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of localized intermediate/high risk and metastatic PCa has substantially increased over the past decade, while the proportion of low-risk disease has decreased. This shift has been primarily driven by increased diagnosis of high-grade disease. National guidelines advising against PSA screening may have contributed to these findings.

Peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion does not adversely affect oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for urinary bladder cancer: a propensity score-weighted European multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of peri-operative blood transfusion (PBT) on recurrence-free survival, overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC), using a contemporary European multicentre cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Prospective Multicentre Radical Cystectomy Series (PROMETRICS) includes data on 679 patients who underwent RC at 18 European tertiary care centres in 2011. The association between PBT and oncological survival outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. Imbalances in clinicopathological features between patients receiving PBT vs those not receiving PBT were mitigated using conventional multivariable adjusting as well as inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: Overall, 611 patients had complete information on PBT, and 315 (51.6%) received PBT. The two groups (PBT vs no PBT) differed significantly with respect to most clinicopathological features, including peri-operative blood loss: median (interquartile range [IQR]) 1000 (600-1500) mL vs 500 (400-800) mL (P < 0.001). Independent predictors of receipt of PBT in multivariable logistic regression analysis were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-9.71; P < 0.001), body mass index (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.95; P < 0.001), type of urinary diversion (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.82; P = 0.013), blood loss (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.40; P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.37-5.00; P = 0.004), and ≥pT3 tumours (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.02-2.48; P = 0.041). In 531 patients with complete data on survival outcomes, unweighted and unadjusted survival analyses showed worse overall survival, cancer-specific mortality and other-cause mortality rates for patients receiving PBT(P < 0.001, P = 0.017 and P = 0.001, respectively). After IPTW adjustment, those differences no longer held true. PBT was not associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% CI 0.53-1.58; P = 0.8), overall survival (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.55-2.05; P = 0.9), cancer-specific mortality (sub-HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.62-1.92; P = 0.8) and other-cause mortality (sub-HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.26-3.85; P > 0.9) in IPTW-adjusted Cox regression and competing-risks analyses. The same held true in conventional multivariable Cox and competing-risks analyses, where PBT could not be confirmed as a predictor of any given endpoint (all P values >0.05). CONCLUSION: The present results did not show an adverse effect of PBT on oncological outcomes after adjusting for baseline differences in patient characteristics.