[State of integration of palliative care at Comprehensive Cancer Centers funded by German Cancer Aid]. / Integration der Palliativmedizin in die von der Deutschen Krebshilfe e. V. geförderten onkologischen Spitzenzentren.

BACKGROUND: Similarities and differences of integration of palliative care in clinical care, research and education structures at German Comprehensive Cancer Centers (CCC) are not known in detail. OBJECTIVE: Provide an overview of availability and the way of integration of specialized palliative care at CCCs funded by the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe, DKH). METHOD: We conducted structured interviews from May to August 2014 with heads of palliative care departments (personally or by telephone). The interviews included a quantitative and a qualitative part. Other stakeholders of CCCs were asked the questions of the qualitative part. We evaluated the qualitative data using the content analysis by Mayring and MAXQDA 11.0. SPSS 21.0 was used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: 26 interviews were realized in 13 CCCs with 14 sites, which received funding, by DKH till August 2014 (one CCC had two university hospitals). Of these, 12 sites had a palliative care unit (86%), 11 sites had palliative care consulting services available (79%). Participation of palliative care specialists in tumor boards is not provided in 3 institutions (21%) and is often not feasible on regular basis in the other institutions, due to staffing shortage. In 7 sites (50%) defined criteria to integrate palliative care into CCCs were available. In the last 5 years specialized palliative care of 4 sites received an invitation for a research project by another department within the CCC (29%). 10 sites (71%) had started own palliative care research projects. Chairs in palliative care were available in 4 CCCs (29%). CONCLUSION: The extent and depth of palliative care integration in the 14 CCC sites is heterogeneous.

Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma under daily practice conditions.

Sorafenib has recently been shown to be effective for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in randomized controlled trials. Here, we report the experience with sorafenib in 25 patients with advanced HCC under daily practice conditions. Tolerance to sorafenib was acceptable and side effects were manageable, although the ECOG performance status was reduced in all patients. The most prevalent grade 2/3 side effects were fatigue (40%) and diarrhea (24%), and withdrawal from therapy occurred in 29% of patients. Disease stabilization was documented in 60% of patients. The median treatment time was 2.7 months and overall survival was 11.0 months. No significant serum alpha-fetoprotein decline was noted at the time of the first radiological control in a subgroup of patients with baseline levels >50 ng/ml who achieved stable disease. In conclusion, in daily practice sorafenib is safe and disease stabilization can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, intolerance to sorafenib can affect treatment adherence substantially.

A pilot study on intensive weekly 24-hour intra-arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: A pilot study was performed to evaluate the tolerance and efficacy of a hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) in patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 11 patients, 135 applications of high-dose HAI of 5-FU/FA were administered. All patients had been intra-arterially pretreated, and 2 of them had received an additional intravenous therapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a weekly HAI of FA 500 mg/m2 over 1 h, immediately followed by HAI of 5-FU over 24 h. Four patients received a 5-FU starting dose of 2,000 mg/m2 and 7 patients of 2,400 mg/m2. One course consisted of 12 weekly applications interrupted by 1 week after 6 applications and 4 weeks after 12 applications. RESULTS: The applied regimen caused only mild side effects. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently side effects with 36 episodes out of 135 applications (WHO grade > or = 3: 2 episodes). Diarrhea was a minor problem occurring with 8 episodes (WHO grade > or = 3: 1 episode). There was no evidence of myelosuppression, hand-foot syndrome, neurotoxicity, and biliary sclerosis. A partial remission was observed in 3 patients, and a disease stabilization in 2 patients while the disease progressed in 6 patients under high-dose HAI of 5-FU/FA. CONCLUSION: The present pilot study demonstrates that the weekly high-dose HAI of 5-FU/FA is well tolerated and associated with very mild toxicity. Because of the encouraging response rate in patients, whose disease progressed under the conventional intra-arterial therapy either with 5-FU/FA or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine, this regimen seems to be an effective second-line treatment and should be evaluated in nonpretreated patients in a phase II study.

The value of postoperative hepatic arterial infusion following curative liver resection.

Despite the increasing success of liver resection in treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, at least 50% of patients will recur again in the remaining liver. In a non-randomized, prospective study we examined the benefit of regional adjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgical resection alone. Data from 81 consecutive patients who received curative liver resection and from 29 additional patients who underwent palliative liver resection were collected. Intraarterial adjuvant treatment with FUDR or 5-Fluorouracil was performed after liver resection in 60 patients. Mortality (5.5%) and morbidity (30%) were not increased by catheter implantation. Five or more cycles of intraarterial chemotherapy were completed in 39 (89%) of the curative resected patients. Depending on the treatment schedule the most frequent local and systemic side effects were stomatitis (13%) hepatobiliary toxicity and in two patients biliary sclerosis after a FUDR treatment of 14 days. In curative resected patients median time to intrahepatic recurrence was significantly delayed by adjuvant arterial treatment from 17 to 63 months (p = 0.015). Median survival time (overall 48 months) was increased from 33 months after surgery to 52 months (p = 0.064) and in case of 5 or more treatment cycles to 54 months (p = 0.046).

[Results of resection and adjuvant therapy of liver metastases of primary colorectal tumors--a review of the literature]. / Ergebnisse der Resektion und adjuvanten Therapie von Lebermetastasen kolorektaler Primärtumoren--eine Literaturübersicht.

Natural history of patients with colorectal liver metastases is not significantly changed even by curative resection. The majority unfortunately relapse. The results of adjuvant treatment after resection were evaluated by analysis of 17 publications as well as by own data (60 patients). 340 patients were either treated by intraarterial (n = 201), systemic (n = 82), intraportal (n = 29) or intraperitoneal (n = 28) chemoinfusion (5-Fluorouracil or Floxuridine). An alternative approach was the treatment with specific immunotherapy using tumor vaccination (n = 35) or monoclonal antibodies (n = 20). Morbidity of adjuvant treatment includes local (chemical hepatitis, biliary sclerosis) and systemic (diarrhea, stomatitis) side effects. Technical complications could reach a level of up to 50% in case of local administration. With exception of 6 studies no comparison with a resection only group was performed. Despite postulated increase of survival and recurrence free time with historical controls the results of current ongoing studies are needed before general use of adjuvant treatment can be recommended.