RESUMEN
Several publications show that superselective conventional TransArterial ChemoEmbolization (cTACE), meaning cTACE performed selectively with a microcatheter positioned as close as possible to the tumor, improves outcomes, maximizing the anti-tumoral effect and minimizing the collateral damages of the surrounding liver parenchyma. Recent recommendations coming from the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) highlighted that TACE must be used in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) "selectively targetable" and "accessible to supraselective catheterization." The goal of the manuscript is to better define such population and to standardize superselective cTACE (ss-cTACE) technique. An expert panel with extensive clinical-procedural experience in TACE, have come together in a virtual meeting to generate recommendations and express their consensus. Experts recommend that anytime cTACE is proposed, it should be ss-cTACE, preferably with a 1.5-2.0 Fr microcatheter. Ideally, ss-cTACE should be proposed to patients with less than five lesions and a maximum number of two segments involved, with largest tumor smaller than 5 cm. Angio Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) should be used to detect enhancing tumors, tumor feeders and guide tumor targeting. Whole tumor volume should be covered to obtain the best response. Adding peritumoral margins is encouraged but not mandatory. The treatment should involve a water-in-oil emulsion, whose quality is assessable with the "drop test." Additional particulate embolization should be systematically performed, as per definition of cTACE procedure. Non-contrast CBCT or Multi-Detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) combined with angiography has been considered the gold standard for imaging during TACE, and should be used to assess tumor coverage during the procedure. Experts convene that superselectivity decreases incidence of adverse effects and improves tolerance. Experts recommend contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography (CT) as initial imaging on first follow-up after ss-cTACE, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) if remaining tumor viability cannot be confidently assessed on CT. If no response is obtained after two ss-cTACE sessions within six months, patient must be considered unsuitable for TACE and proposed for alternative therapy. Patients are best served by multidisciplinary decision-making, and Interventional Radiologists should take an active role in patient selection, treatment allocation, and post-procedural care.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Emulsiones , Aceite Etiodizado , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , AguaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has several limitations due to the lack of standardization. The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical and physical characteristics and behaviors over time of emulsions for cTACE and to assess intra- and inter-operator variabilities in the preparation processes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in vitro study involved evaluation of emulsions for cTACE prepared using two methods: water-in-oil (WiO) and chemotherapeutic-in-oil (CiO). Three emulsions were prepared with each method and obtained after 20, 50, and 100 pumping exchanges. A drop from each final mixture was analyzed via light microscopy (time 1) and after 5, 10, 15, and 20min since the end of preparation. After 20min, all preparations were re-mixed and new drops were re-evaluated. The intra- and inter-operator variabilities were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean droplet diameter decreased non-significantly when the number of pumping exchanges increased and increased significantly over time for both WiO and CiO. The droplets returned to their initial diameters after re-mixing. There were no significant differences in the intra- and inter-operator variabilities (P>0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Any interventional radiologist, regardless of their experience, may prepare these emulsions. These data may represent a set of instructions to standardize cTACE.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Composición de Medicamentos/normas , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Emulsiones , Humanos , Yopamidol/administración & dosificación , Yopamidol/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Sorafenib is currently the gold standard therapy for palliative treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with compensated liver disease. There are few cases reported in literature describing patients with HCC achieving a complete remission (CR) due to Sorafenib therapy. We report the case of a 62-year old patient who obtained CR despite single, long drug discontinuation and kept it without any maintenance therapy. Furthermore, this is the first case describing the onset of a likely IgG4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis and cholangitis during Sorafenib administration. Further studies are required to define the predictors of a good response to Sorafenib and to codify a therapeutic maintenance regimen for patients who achieve CR.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunoglobulina G , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paraproteinemias/complicaciones , Inducción de RemisiónRESUMEN
Whilst surgery represents the gold standard for the treatment of adrenal primary malignant tumors, metastatic involvement of the adrenal glands is generally approached conservatively; however, surgery for local control has been controversial, and several reports have described the utility of surgical removal in terms of prolonged survival in selected patients. Different techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), laser induced thermal therapy (LITT), cryoablation (CRA), and chemical ablation, are employed in percutaneous image-guided ablation for primary and metastatic malignancies of the adrenal glands, in case of patients with multiple comorbidities or who refuse surgery. Technical success, clinical success and safety were analysed and discussed in this systematic review. Tumor size was found a significant determinant for local disease control; histology of the primary malignancy and coexistence of tumor elsewhere were correlated with prognosis. These procedures resulted to be feasible and safe, with hypertensive crisis representing the most common complication. Although there is lack of evidence in the literature concerning outcomes compared with surgery, percutaneous ablation may represent a useful therapeutic option for controlling unresectable adrenal metastases, offering patients opportunities for improved survival.
RESUMEN
Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cancer worldwide. Its incidence and mortality vary depending on geographic area, with the highest rates in Asian countries, particularly in China, Japan, and South Korea. Accurate imaging staging has become crucial for the application of various treatment strategies, especially for curative treatments in early stages. Unfortunately, most GCs are still diagnosed at an advanced stage, with the peritoneum (61-80%), distant lymph nodes (44-50%), and liver (26-38%) as the most common metastatic locations. Metastatic disease is limited to the peritoneum in 58% of cases; in nonperitoneal distant metastases, the most involved GC metastasization site is the liver (82%). The eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system is the most commonly used system for determining GC prognosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography, and 18-fluorideoxyglucose positron emission tomography are historically the most accurate imaging techniques for GC staging. However, studies have recently shown renewed interest in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a useful tool in GC staging, especially for distant metastasis assessment. The technical improvement of diffusion-weighted imaging and the increasing use of hepatobiliary contrast agents have been shown to increase the diagnostic performance of MRI, particularly for detecting peritoneal and liver metastasis. However, no principal oncological guidelines have included the use of MRI as a first-line technique for distant metastasis evaluation during the GC staging process, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. This review analyzed the role of the principal imaging techniques in GC diagnosis and staging, focusing on the potential role of MRI, especially for assessing peritoneal and liver metastases.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Rectosigmoid endometriosis and Dolichocolon can both present with a triad of chronic abdominal pain, constipation and bloating. The relationship between these two pathologies is unknown. The present study aims to determine the frequency of DC in women with rectosigmoid endometriosis and its possible impact on pre- and post-operative symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 113 consecutive patients submitted to magnetic resonance imaging enema and subsequent complete surgical removal for symptomatic rectosigmoid endometriosis between June 2015 to June 2018. Dolichocolon is an anatomic variant characterized by redundancies and lengthening of the colon. We divided our study population according to its presence or absence. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic data, surgical findings and pre- and post-operative clinical variables. Pain symptoms were assessed through numerical rating scale from 0 to 10. Bowel complaints included constipation, bloating and diarrhea. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (31 %) presented a dolichocolon at magnetic resonance imaging enema. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic data, pre-operative clinical variables and surgical findings. At 6-month follow-up, there was a significant improvement of symptoms, except for constipation and bloating in dolichocolon group. In particular, we observed with a statistical difference (p < .05) the persistence of constipation and bloating in dolichocolon group compared to non-dolichocolon group. CONCLUSIONS: Dolichocolon was observed in one third patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis and could influence surgical outcomes for rectosigmoid endometriosis in terms of relief of bowel symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Colon/patología , Enfermedades del Colon/patología , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Endometriosis/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/cirugía , Adulto , Enfermedades del Colon/fisiopatología , Estreñimiento , Diarrea , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Enfermedades del Recto/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/patología , Enfermedades del Sigmoide/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death. Sorafenib, a multitarget angiogenesis inhibitor, is an approved frontline treatment for advanced HCC in Western countries, although a complete response (CR) to treatment is infrequently reported. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, has been shown to be effect in both treatment-naïve patients and those previously treated with sorafenib. To date, however, only one case of sustained CR to metronomic capecitabine has been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe three cases of advanced HCC treated with metronomic capecitabine where a CR was obtained. In the first case, capecitabine was administered as first line therapy; in the second case, capecitabine was used after intolerance to sorafenib; while in the third case, capecitabine was administered after sorafenib failure. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is a potentially important treatment option for patients with advanced HCC and may even represent a cure in certain cases.
Asunto(s)
Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hígado/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Metronómica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Masculino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Inducción de Remisión , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the inter-operator concordance and the potential sources of discordance in defining response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: All patients who received sorafenib between September 2008 and February 2015 were scrutinised for this retrospective study. Images were evaluated separately by three radiologists with different expertise in liver imaging (operator 1, >10 years; operator 2, 5 years; operator 3, no specific training in liver imaging), according to: response evaluation radiological criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) 1.1, modified RECIST (mRECIST) and response evaluation criteria in cancer of the liver (RECICL). RESULTS: The overall response concordance between the more expert operators was good, irrespective of the criteria (RECIST 1.1, ĸ = 0.840; mRECIST, ĸ = 0.871; RECICL, ĸ = 0.819). Concordance between the less expert operator and the other colleagues was lower. The most evident discordance was in target lesion response assessment, with expert operators disagreeing mostly on lesion selection and less expert operators on lesion measurement. As a clinical correlate, overall survival was more tightly related with "progressive disease" as assessed by the expert compared to the same assessment performed by operator 3. CONCLUSIONS: Decision on whether a patient is a responder or progressor under sorafenib may vary among different operators, especially in case of a non-specifically trained radiologist. Regardless of the adopted criteria, patients should be evaluated by experienced radiologists to minimise variability in this critical instance. KEY POINTS: ⢠Inter-operator variability in the assessment of response to sorafenib is poorly known. ⢠The concordance between operators with expertise in liver imaging was good. ⢠Target lesions selection was the main source of discordance between expert operators. ⢠Concordance with non-specifically trained operator was lower, independently from the response criteria. ⢠The non-specifically trained operator was mainly discordant in measurements of target lesions.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundario , Competencia Clínica , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Sorafenib and transarterial (90) Y-radioembolization (TARE) are possible treatments for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate-advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No study directly comparing sorafenib and TARE is currently available. This single-centre retrospective study compares the outcomes achieved with sorafenib and TARE in HCC patients potentially amenable to either therapy. METHODS: Seventy-four sorafenib (71 ± 10 years, male 87%, BCLC B/C 53%/47%) and 63 TARE HCC patients (66 ± 9 years, male 79%, BCLC B/C 41%/59%) were included based on the following criteria: Child-Pugh class A/B, performance status ≤1, HCC unfit for other effective therapies, no metastases and no previous systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Median overall survivals of the two groups were comparable, being 14.4 months (95% CI: 4.3-24.5) in sorafenib and 13.2 months (95% CI: 6.1-20.2) in TARE patients, with 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of 52.1%, 29.3% and 14.7% vs 51.8%, 27.8% and 21.6% respectively. Two TARE patients underwent liver transplantation after successful down-staging. To minimize the impact of confounding factors on survival analysis, propensity model matched 32 patients of each group for median age, tumour gross pathology and the independent prognostic factors (portal vein thrombosis, performance status, Model for End Liver Disease). Even after matching, the median survival did not differ between sorafenib (13.1 months; 95% CI: 1.2-25.9) and TARE patients (11.2 months; 95% CI: 6.7-15.7), with comparable 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: In cirrhotic patients with intermediate-advanced or not-otherwise-treatable HCC, sorafenib and TARE provide similar survivals. Down-staging allowing liver transplantation only occurred after TARE.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Radioisótopos de Itrio/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , SorafenibRESUMEN
We present the first case of salvage radiotherapy based on the results of 18F-FACBC PET/CT performed for a PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy. The patients underwent 11CCholine PET/CT and multiparametric MRI that were negative while 18F-FACBC PET/CT visualized a suspected local relapse confirmed by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. No distant relapse was detected. Thus the patient was submitted to salvage radiotherapy in the prostatic fossa. After 20 months of follow-up, the PSA was undetectable and 18F-FACBC PET/CT was negative. Salvage radiotherapy after surgery, provided that it is administered at the earliest evidence of the biochemical relapse, may improve cancer control and favourably influence the course of disease as well as the adjuvant approach. New imaging techniques may increase the efficacy of the salvage radiotherapy thus helping in the selection of the patients. Preliminary clinical reports showed an improvement in the detection rate of 20-40% of 18F-FACBC in comparison with 11C-Choline for the detection of disease relapse after radical prostatecomy, rendering the 18F-FACBC the potential radiotracer of the future for prostate cancer.