[The role of visual afferentation in the development of early defense behavior of pied flycatcher nestlings].

The development of defense behavior in normal and visually deprived pied flycatcher nestlings was studied in the wild. It was demonstrated that the young deprived of the visual afferentation did not develop the freezing posture. In the majority of cases, specific alarm call suppressed begging in visually deprived nestlings less effectively than in the control ones. Visually deprived nestlings could not discriminate between the alarm call and other rhythmically organized acoustic signals even though the latter effectively suppressed begging.

[Increasing selectivity of defense behavior during development of pied flycatcher nestlings]. / Rost selektivnosti oboronitel'nogo povedeniia v ontogeneze ptentsov mukholovki-pestrushki.

The development of defense reaction was studied in the wildlife and experimentally in 7 broods of altricial pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) nestlings. Field studies demonstrated that passive-defense response first appeared on the 4th day of the nest life. It developed from the cessation of begging in young relatively satiated nestlings to characteristic freezing response independent of the level of feeding motivation in older nestlings. Older nestlings also acquire the defense reaction in response to novel visual stimuli. The efficiency of the natural stimulus for defense behavior (species-specific alarm call) nongradually changes during the nest life attaining the 100% level only on the 11th posthatching day. During the initial phase of defense behavior development, the reaction can be induced by different rhythmically organized stimuli. Later it becomes considerably more selective and other rhythmic and acoustic signals become much less effective than the alarm call.