EB 2017 Article: Soy protein isolate feeding does not result in reproductive toxicity in the pre-pubertal rat testis.

The isoflavone phytoestrogens found in the soy protein isolate used in soy infant formulas have been shown to have estrogenic actions in the developing male reproductive tract resulting in reproductive toxicity. However, few studies have examined potential estrogenicity of soy protein isolate as opposed to that of pure isoflavones. In this study, we fed weanling male Sprague-Dawley rats a semi-purified diet with casein or soy protein isolate as the sole protein source from postnatal day 21 to 33. Additional groups were fed casein or soy protein isolate and treated s.c. with 10 µg/kg/d estradiol via osmotic minipump. Estradiol treatment reduced testis, prostate weights, and serum androgen concentrations ( P < 0.05). Soy protein isolate had no effect. Estradiol up-regulated 489 and down-regulated 1237 testicular genes >1.5-fold ( P < 0.05). In contrast, soy protein isolate only significantly up-regulated expression of 162 genes and down-regulated 16 genes. The top 30 soy protein isolate-up-regulated genes shared 93% concordance with estradiol up-regulated genes. There was little overlap between soy protein isolate down-regulated genes and those down-regulated by estradiol treatment. Functional annotation analysis revealed significant differences in testicular biological processes affected by estradiol or soy protein isolate. Estradiol had major actions on genes involved in reproductive processes including down-regulation of testicular steroid synthesis and expression of steroid receptor activated receptor (Star) and cytochrome P450 17α-hydroxylase/(Cyp17a1). In contrast, soy protein isolate primarily affected pathways associated with macromolecule modifications including ubiquitination and histone methylation. Our results indicate that rather than acting as a weak estrogen in the developing testis, soy protein isolate appears to act as a selective estrogen receptor modulator with little effect on reproductive processes. Impact statement Soy protein isolate (SPI) is the sole protein used to make soy-based infant formulas. SPI contains phytoestrogens, which are structurally similar to estradiol. These phytoestrogens, daidzein, genistein, and equol, fit the definition of endocrine-disrupting compounds, and at high concentrations, have estrogenic actions resulting in reproductive toxicity in the developing male, when provided as isolated chemicals. However, few animal studies have examined the potential estrogenicity of SPI as opposed to pure isoflavones. In this study, SPI feeding did not elicit an estrogenic response in the testis nor any adverse outcomes including reduced testicular growth, or androgen production during early development in rats when compared to those receiving estradiol. These findings are consistent with emerging data showing no differences in reproductive development in males and female children that received breast milk, cow's milk formula, or soy infant formula during the postnatal feeding period.

Uterine responses to feeding soy protein isolate and treatment with 17ß-estradiol differ in ovariectomized female rats.

There are concerns regarding reproductive toxicity from consumption of soy foods, including an increased risk of endometriosis and endometrial cancer, as a result of phytoestrogen consumption. In this study, female rats were fed AIN-93G diets made with casein (CAS) or soy protein isolate (SPI) from postnatal day (PND) 30, ovariectomized on PND 50 and infused with 5 µg/kg/d 17ß-estradiol (E2) or vehicle. E2 increased uterine wet weight (P<0.05). RNAseq analysis revealed that E2 significantly altered expression of 1991 uterine genes (P<0.05). SPI feeding had no effect on uterine weight and altered expression of far fewer genes than E2 at 152 genes (P<0.05). Overlap between E2 and SPI genes was limited to 67 genes. Functional annotation analysis indicated significant differences in uterine biological processes affected by E2 and SPI and little evidence for recruitment of estrogen receptor (ER)α to the promoters of ER-responsive genes after SPI feeding. The major E2 up-regulated uterine pathways were carcinogenesis and extracellular matrix organization, whereas SPI feeding up-regulated uterine peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) signaling and fatty acid metabolism. The combination of E2 and SPI resulted in significant regulation of 504 fewer genes relative to E2 alone. The ability of E2 to induce uterine proliferation in response to the carcinogen dimethybenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) as measured by expression of PCNA and Ki67 mRNA was suppressed by feeding SPI (P<0.05). These data suggest that SPI is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) interacting with a small sub-set of E2-regulated genes and is anti-estrogenic in the presence of endogenous estrogens.

Feeding soy protein isolate and treatment with estradiol have different effects on mammary gland morphology and gene expression in weanling male and female rats.

Isoflavones are phytochemical components of soy diets that bind weakly to estrogen receptors (ERs). To study potential estrogen-like actions of soy in the mammary gland during early development, we fed weanling male and female Sprague-Dawley rats a semipurified diet with casein as the sole protein source from postnatal day 21 to 33, the same diet substituting soy protein isolate (SPI) for casein, or the casein diet supplemented with estradiol (E2) at 10 µg/kg/day. In contrast to E2, the SPI diet induced no significant change in mammary morphology. In males, there were 34 genes for which expression was changed ≥2-fold in the SPI group vs. 509 changed significantly by E2, and 8 vs. 174 genes in females. Nearly half of SPI-responsive genes in males were also E2 responsive, including adipogenic genes. Serum insulin was found to be decreased by the SPI diet in males. SPI and E2 both downregulated the expression of ERα (Esr1) in males and females, and ERß (Esr2) only in males. Chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed an increased binding of ERα to the promoter of the progesterone receptor (Pgr) and Esr1 in both SPI- and E2-treated males compared with the casein group but differential recruitment of ERß. ER promoter binding did not correlate with differences in Pgr mRNA expression. This suggests that SPI fails to recruit appropriate co-activators at E2-inducible genes. Our results indicate that SPI behaves like a selective estrogen receptor modulator rather than a weak estrogen in the developing mammary gland.