Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gut ; 72(11): 2031-2038, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37468228

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recommended schedule for single capsule bismuth quadruple therapy (scBQT, Pylera) includes a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) two times a day and three scBQT capsules four times a day. Four times a day treatments are inconvenient and reduce adherence. In contrast, adherence improves with three times a day schedules. In clinical practice, many gastroenterologists use four capsule scBQT three times a day. However, the effectiveness and safety of this latter approach remain uncertain. AIM: To assess the effectiveness and safety of scBQT administered three times a day in the patients included in the European Registry on Helicobacter pylori Management (Hp-EuReg). METHODS: All Spanish adult patients registered in the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database from June 2013 to March 2021 receiving 10-day scBQT were analysed. Modified intention-to-treat effectiveness, adherence and the safety of scBQT given three times a day were calculated and compared with the four times a day schedule. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine independent factors predicting cure of the infection. RESULTS: Of the 3712 cases, 2516 (68%) were four times a day and 1196 (32%) three times a day. Mean age was 51 years, 63% were women and 15% had a peptic ulcer. The three times a day schedule showed significantly better overall cure rates than four times a day (1047/1112, 94%; 95% CI 92.7 to 95.6 vs 2207/2423, 91%; 95% CI 89.9 to 92.2, respectively, p=0.002). Adherence and safety data were similar for both regimens. In the multivariate analysis, three times a day dosage, first-line therapy, use of standard or high-dose PPIs and adherence over 90% were significantly associated with cure of the infection. CONCLUSIONS: ScBQT prescribed three times a day was more effective than the traditional four times a day schedule. No differences were observed in treatment adherence or safety.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Bismuto/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Sistema de Registros , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 71(9)2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28869699

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of currently recommended third-line therapies for Helicobacter pylori is suboptimal, even that of culture-guided treatments. Resistance to multiple antibiotics is the major factor related to treatment failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a 14-day therapy using high-dose of amoxicillin, metronidazole and esomeprazole. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multicenter open-label study as a register in routine clinical practice in patients with two previous failures of eradication therapy. A triple therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g t.d.s and metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s for 2 weeks was administered as a third-line therapy after a first treatment including clarithromycin and a second treatment including a quinolone. Helicobacter pylori status was determined by either histology or 13 C-UBT both before and after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included in this study. An interim analysis showed that only three out of eight patients who had received metronidazole in previous eradication regimens were cured (37%, 95% CI 8-75); as a result, after this interim analysis only metronidazole-naïve patients were included. The ITT eradication rate in metronidazole-naive patients was 64% (95% CI 51-76). Adverse events occurred in 58% of patients, all of them mild-to-moderate. Two patients (3%) did not complete >90% of the treatment because of side effects. No severe adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Cure rates of this 14-day schedule using high-dose esomeprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole as a third-line eradication regimen were suboptimal, especially in patients who had received metronidazole in previous failed eradication regimens.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Metronidazol/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Esomeprazol/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA