Pasotuxizumab, a BiTE® immune therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Phase I, dose-escalation study findings.

Aim: We report results of a first-in-human study of pasotuxizumab, a PSMA bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) immune therapy mediating T-cell killing of tumor cells in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients & methods: We assessed once-daily subcutaneous (SC) pasotuxizumab. All SC patients developed antidrug antibodies; therefore, continuous intravenous (cIV) infusion was assessed. Results: A total of 47 patients received pasotuxizumab (SC: n = 31, 0.5-172 µg/d; cIV: n = 16, 5-80 µg/d). The SC maximum tolerated dose was 172.0 µg/d. A sponsor change stopped the cIV cohort early; maximum tolerated dose was not determined. PSA responders occurred (>50% PSA decline: SC, n = 9; cIV, n = 3), including two long-term responders. Conclusion: Data support pasotuxizumab safety in advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer and represent evidence of BiTE monotherapy efficacy in solid tumors. Clinical trial registration: NCT01723475 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Patient-Reported Outcomes from the Phase III Randomized IMmotion151 Trial: Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab versus Sunitinib in Treatment-Naïve Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were evaluated in the phase III IMmotion151 trial (NCT02420821) to inform overall treatment/disease burden of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab 1,200 mg intravenous (i.v.) infusions every 3 weeks (q3w) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg i.v. q3w or sunitinib 50 mg per day orally 4 weeks on/2 weeks off. Patients completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19), and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) at baseline, q3w during treatment, at end of treatment, and during survival follow-up. Longitudinal and time to deterioration (TTD) analyses for core and RCC symptoms and their interference with daily life, treatment side-effect bother, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated. RESULTS: The intent-to-treat population included 454 and 461 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sunitinib arms, respectively. Completion rates for each instrument were 83% to 86% at baseline and ≥ 70% through week 54. Milder symptoms, less symptom interference and treatment side-effect bother, and better HRQOL at most visits were reported with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sunitinib. The TTD HR (95% CI) favored atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for core (HR, 0.50; 0.40-0.62) and RCC symptoms (HR, 0.45; 0.37-0.55), symptom interference (HR, 0.56; 0.46-0.68), and HRQOL (HR, 0.68; 0.58-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: PROs in IMmotion151 suggest lower overall treatment burden with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab compared with sunitinib in patients with treatment-naïve mRCC and provide further evidence for clinical benefit of this regimen.

Microsatellite instability and survival after adjuvant chemotherapy among stage II and III colon cancer patients: results from a population-based study.

Previous studies have reported conflicting results regarding the benefit of administering 5-FU-based chemotherapy to colon cancer (CC) patients with microsatellite-instable (MSI-high) tumors, and results from stage-specific analyses are scarce. Patients with stage II or III CC were recruited as part of a population-based study between 2003 and 2015. The Cox regression models including propensity score weighting were used to calculate hazard ratios and confidence intervals for the association between chemotherapy and cancer-specific (CSS), relapse-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS) by stage of disease and MSI status of the tumor. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. A total of 1010 CC patients were included in the analysis (54% stage II, 46% stage III, 20% MSI-high). Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 48 (8.7%) stage II and 366 (79%) stage III patients. Overall, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better CSS [HR = 0.65 (0.49-0.86)] than those who received surgery alone. Among stage II patients, only 64 (12%) cancer-related deaths occurred, none of which in MSI-high patients who received chemotherapy. Patients with MSI-high tumors who received adjuvant treatment showed better CSS and a tendency toward better RFS compared to MSI-high patients who did not receive chemotherapy [HRCSS  = 0.36 (0.15-0.82), HRRFS  = 0.49 (0.22-1.06)]. Patients with microsatellite-stable (MSS) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy also had significantly better survival [HRCSS  = 0.65 (0.48-0.87) and HRRFS  = 0.68 (0.52-0.88)]. In this population-based study including stage II and III CC patients, we observed a survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for both MSS and MSI-high tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to be beneficial among high-risk stage II patients with MSI-high tumors.

Serum very long-chain fatty acid-containing lipids predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in urological cancers.

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have significantly changed the therapeutic landscape of oncology. We adopted a non-invasive metabolomic approach to understand immunotherapy response and failure in 28 urological cancer patients. In total, 134 metabolites were quantified in patient sera before the first, second, and third CPI doses. Modeling the association between metabolites and CPI response and patient characteristics revealed that one predictive metabolite class  (n = 9/10) were very long-chain fatty acid-containing lipids (VLCFA-containing lipids). The best predictive performance was achieved through a multivariate model, including age and a centroid of VLCFA-containing lipids prior to first immunotherapy (sensitivity: 0.850, specificity: 0.825, ROC: 0.935). We hypothesize that the association of VLCFA-containing lipids with CPI response is based on enhanced peroxisome signaling in T cells, which results in a switch to fatty acid catabolism. Beyond use as a novel predictive non-invasive biomarker, we envision that nutritional supplementation with VLCFA-containing lipids might serve as an immuno sensitizer.

Response to anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibodies in men treated for platinum refractory germ cell cancer relapsed after high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment options for patients with platinum refractory metastatic germ cell tumours (GCT) relapsing after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation are limited and survival is poor. Antibodies directed against programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) are currently assessed within clinical trials. We present updated data on our experience with checkpoint inhibitors as a compassionate use off-label treatment attempt for highly-pretreated patients with GCT and provide an overview of the current literature on PD-L1 expression in this rare tumour entity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed all patients with platinum refractory GCT treated with checkpoint inhibitors at our institutions between 2015 and 2017. Data were retrieved retrospectively from the patient charts. RESULTS: Seven patients were treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. Four patients received single-dose treatment and died shortly afterwards due to tumour progression; the remaining three patients received treatment for at least 6 months. No significant treatment toxicity was observed. Long-term tumour response was achieved in two of the three patients, both of them highly positive for PD-L1 staining. INTERPRETATION: We consider checkpoint inhibition to be efficient in carefully selected patients with platinum refractory GCT. However, predictive markers associated with tumour response are not yet known and larger prospective clinical trials are warranted.

Effective downsizing but enhanced intratumoral heterogeneity following neoadjuvant sorafenib in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of sorafenib prior to surgery for downsizing tumors in patients with non-metastatic cT1-3 renal tumors together with a characterization of functional intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The effects of 4-week sorafenib prior to curative surgery were assessed in a prospective, single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, pilot trial in patients with T1-3N0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients received sorafenib or placebo for 28 days prior to surgery. MRI was performed at baseline and prior to surgery to calculate tumor volume. The clinical responses were further characterized on the molecular level by immunohistochemical stainings for Ki-67, cleaved caspase-3, and CD31. RESULTS: After enrolling 20 patients into the study, 14 patients were randomized, of which 12 patients were available for analysis. While no significant change in tumor volume was seen for placebo (range = -24.2-0.2%) a reduction of 29.0% (range = -4.9-61.1%) was detected for sorafenib (p < 0.05). Primary renal tumor diameter changed from 10.6 cm (range = 6.5-10.8) to 10.7 cm (range = 6.7-11.1) in the placebo group, and from 5.4 cm (range = 4.3-7.3) to 4.4 cm (range = 3.5-6.8) for the sorafenib group, at baseline vs. 28 days of treatment. Correlative assessment of proliferation, apoptosis, and microvessel density revealed an enhanced degree of functional ITH in treated patients suggesting adaptive and/or regenerative processes with potential relevance for the development of drug resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib in standard dosage, given preoperatively for 28 days, was clinically active in downsizing tumors in patients with locally confined, non-metastatic RCC together but led to an enhanced functional ITH in the residual tumor tissue.