Polymerisation of cyanoacrylates: The effect of sclero-embolic and contrast agents.

OBJECTIVES: The objective is to investigate the interaction of sclero-embolic and contrast agents with the polymerisation of medical grade n-butyl-cyanoacrylates. METHODS: An in vitro spectrophotometric absorbance method was developed to detect changes in light transmission to measure n-BCA polymerisation. The initiation and the rate-of-polymerisation of mixtures of n-BCA with sclero-embolic and contrast agents were investigated. RESULTS: Initiation of polymerisation: VENABLOCK™ and HISTOACRYL® were the fastest agents to polymerise, while VENASEAL™ was the slowest. Rate of polymerisation: Hypertonic saline inhibited the polymerisation of all n-BCAs, while hypertonic glucose prolonged the polymerisation rate. ETHANOL and detergent sclerosants had no effect. Contrast agents OMNIPAQUE™ and ULTRAVIST® initiated and prolonged the polymerisation of n-BCA, but in contrast, LIPIODOL® failed to initiate the process. CONCLUSIONS: The commercially available medical cyanoacrylates differ in their polymerisation rates. These polymerisation rates are further affected when these products are used in conjunction with other compounds, such as sclero-embolic and contrast agents.

LIPIODOL reduces the lytic activity of detergent sclerosants in vitro.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast agents are used widely in the interventional setting and in particularly in the management of vascular anomalies and have also been used in combination with sclero-embolic agents. There is limited information on the interaction of contrast agents with sclerosant agents when used as mixtures. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of mixing radiological contrast agents with detergent sclerosants and measuring the effect on change in lytic activity of detergent sclerosants in vitro and by proxy the change in potency. METHODS: Red blood cell lysis was assessed following the incubation of two commonly used contrast agents, LIPIODOL® and ULTRAVIST®, mixed with detergent sclerosants, FIBROVEIN®, sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS), and AETHOXYSKLEROL®, polidocanol (POL). RESULTS: The density of both contrast agents was higher than STS and POL and neither of the detergent sclerosants were miscible in LIPIODOL. LIPIODOL on its own caused cell lysis (1.01%, p < 0.05) whereas ULTRAVIST did not. Fifty per cent cell lysis for sclerosant and LIPIODOL mix occurred at concentrations of: 0.041% (2.4 times greater than the control, p < 0.05) and 0.08% (3.6 times greater than the control, p = 0.06) for STS and POL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LIPIODOL, when mixed with sclerosant detergents (ratio 1:1) causes a reduction in the lytic activity of sclerosants and this effect was statistically significant and most prominent in lower sclerosant concentration mixtures.