RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have relatively low resection rates and poor survival despite the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The aim of our study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of three different types of short-course neoadjuvant therapy compared with immediate surgery. METHODS: ESPAC5 (formerly known as ESPAC-5f) was a multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial done in 16 pancreatic centres in two countries (UK and Germany). Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with a WHO performance status of 0 or 1, biopsy proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic head, and were staged as having a borderline resectable tumour by contrast-enhanced CT criteria following central review. Participants were randomly assigned by means of minimisation to one of four groups: immediate surgery; neoadjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, and oral capecitabine 830 mg/m2 twice a day on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle for two cycles); neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, folinic acid given according to local practice, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus injection on days 1 and 15 followed by 2400 mg/m2 46 h intravenous infusion given on days 1 and 15, repeated every 2 weeks for four cycles); or neoadjuvant capecitabine-based chemoradiation (total dose 50·4 Gy in 28 daily fractions over 5·5 weeks [1·8 Gy per fraction, Monday to Friday] with capecitabine 830 mg/m2 twice daily [Monday to Friday] throughout radiotherapy). Patients underwent restaging contrast-enhanced CT at 4-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgical exploration if the tumour was still at least borderline resectable. All patients who had their tumour resected received adjuvant therapy at the oncologist's discretion. Primary endpoints were recruitment rate and resection rate. Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, 89500674, and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2014, and Dec 20, 2018, from 478 patients screened, 90 were randomly assigned to a group (33 to immediate surgery, 20 to gemcitabine plus capecitabine, 20 to FOLFIRINOX, and 17 to capecitabine-based chemoradiation); four patients were excluded from the intention-to-treat analysis (one in the capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy withdrew consent before starting therapy and three [two in the immediate surgery group and one in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group] were found to be ineligible after randomisation). 44 (80%) of 55 patients completed neoadjuvant therapy. The recruitment rate was 25·92 patients per year from 16 sites; 21 (68%) of 31 patients in the immediate surgery and 30 (55%) of 55 patients in the combined neoadjuvant therapy groups underwent resection (p=0·33). R0 resection was achieved in three (14%) of 21 patients in the immediate surgery group and seven (23%) of 30 in the neoadjuvant therapy groups combined (p=0·49). Surgical complications were observed in 29 (43%) of 68 patients who underwent surgery; no patients died within 30 days. 46 (84%) of 55 patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were available for restaging. Six (13%) of 46 had a partial response. Median follow-up time was 12·2 months (95% CI 12·0-12·4). 1-year overall survival was 39% (95% CI 24-61) for immediate surgery, 78% (60-100) for gemcitabine plus capecitabine, 84% (70-100) for FOLFIRINOX, and 60% (37-97) for capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (p=0·0028). 1-year disease-free survival from surgery was 33% (95% CI 19-58) for immediate surgery and 59% (46-74) for the combined neoadjuvant therapies (hazard ratio 0·53 [95% CI 0·28-0·98], p=0·016). Three patients reported local disease recurrence (two in the immediate surgery group and one in the FOLFIRINOX group). 78 (91%) patients were included in the safety set and assessed for toxicity events. 19 (24%) of 78 patients reported a grade 3 or worse adverse event (two [7%] of 28 patients in the immediate surgery group and 17 [34%] of 50 patients in the neoadjuvant therapy groups combined), the most common of which were neutropenia, infection, and hyperglycaemia. INTERPRETATION: Recruitment was challenging. There was no significant difference in resection rates between patients who underwent immediate surgery and those who underwent neoadjuvant therapy. Short-course (8 week) neoadjuvant therapy had a significant survival benefit compared with immediate surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with either gemcitabine plus capecitabine or FOLFIRINOX had the best survival compared with immediate surgery. These findings support the use of short-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Capecitabina , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Gemcitabina , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Over half of the 1.5 million individuals globally who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with stage II-III disease. Understanding clinician attitudes towards treatment for this group is paramount to contextualise real-world outcomes and plan future trials. The aim of this study was to assess clinician awareness of trials assessing the optimal duration of CRC adjuvant therapy, their attitudes towards shorter treatment and their self-reported practice. METHODS: A survey was developed using OnlineSurveys® and distributed to clinicians in April 2019, with a follow-up survey disseminated to a subset of respondents in August 2020. Microsoft Excel® and Stata® were used for analysis. RESULTS: 265 clinicians replied to the first survey, with the majority aware of findings from the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Therapy collaboration and contributory trials. Practice change was greatest for patients under 70 with low-risk stage III CRC, with most uncertainty around using 3-months of doublet chemotherapy for high-risk stage II disease. In August 2020, clinicians (n = 106) were more likely to use 3-months of FOLFOX for low-risk stage III disease and 3-months of CAPOX for stage II disease compared to April 2019. There was no indication that the COVID-19 pandemic had enduring changes on treatment decisions beyond those made in response to trial evidence. DISCUSSION: Clinicians use a risk-stratified approach to treat CRC the adjuvant setting. Lower utilisation of doublet chemotherapy for older and stage II patients has affected the extent of trial implementation. Active dialogue regarding how trial results apply to these groups may improve consensus.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Longitudinales , Oncólogos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a relationship between folic acid dose and the degree of protection against valproate-associated and other antiepileptic drug (AED)-associated fetal structural malformations in women with AED-treated epilepsy. METHODS: Statistical analysis of data from the Raoul Wallenberg Australian Register of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pregnancy involving 2104 folic acid-treated pregnancies in women with epilepsy. RESULTS: Multiple variable logistic regression failed to demonstrate any statistically significant effect of folic acid dosage in reducing overall fetal malformation rates in women taking folic acid either before and during pregnancy (Pâ¯=â¯0.640) or during early pregnancy only (Pâ¯=â¯0.801), and in reducing spina bifida occurrence rates (Pâ¯=â¯0.409). CONCLUSIONS: In the present state of knowledge, it would seem misguided to hope that a folic acid dose of 5â¯mg/day taken before and during pregnancy would protect against the occurrence of valproate-associated and other AED-associated fetal structural malformations. Future studies are required to determine whether high-dose periconceptional folate use may decrease the risk of other valproate-associated adverse fetal outcomes, including impaired post-natal neurobehavioral development.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/etiología , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Australia , Femenino , Ácido Fólico , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Glasgow Microenvironment Score (GMS) combines peritumoural inflammation and tumour stroma percentage to assess interactions between tumour and microenvironment. This was previously demonstrated to associate with colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis, and now requires validation and assessment of interactions with adjuvant therapy. METHODS: Two cohorts were utilised; 862 TNM I-III CRC validation cohort, and 2912 TNM II-III CRC adjuvant chemotherapy cohort (TransSCOT). Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Exploratory endpoint was adjuvant chemotherapy interaction. RESULTS: GMS independently associated with DFS (p = 0.001) and RFS (p < 0.001). GMS significantly stratified RFS for both low risk (GMS 0 v GMS 2: HR 3.24 95% CI 1.85-5.68, p < 0.001) and high-risk disease (GMS 0 v GMS 2: HR 2.18 95% CI 1.39-3.41, p = 0.001). In TransSCOT, chemotherapy type (pinteraction = 0.013), but not duration (p = 0.64) was dependent on GMS. Furthermore, GMS 0 significantly associated with improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFOX compared with CAPOX (HR 2.23 95% CI 1.19-4.16, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the GMS as a prognostic tool for patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer, independent of TNM, with the ability to stratify both low- and high-risk disease. Furthermore, GMS 0 could be employed to identify a subset of patients that benefit from FOLFOX over CAPOX.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Cohortes , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
Histological 'phenotypic subtypes' that classify patients into four groups (immune, canonical, latent and stromal) have previously been demonstrated to stratify survival in a stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) pilot cohort. However, clinical utility has not yet been validated. Therefore, this study assessed prognostic value of these subtypes in additional patient cohorts along with associations with risk of recurrence and response to chemotherapy. Two independent stage I-III CRC patient cohorts (internal and external cohort) were utilised to investigate phenotypic subtypes. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoint was recurrence risk (RR). Stage II-III patients, from the SCOT adjuvant chemotherapy trial, were utilised to further validate prognostic value and for exploratory analysis assessing associations with adjuvant chemotherapy. In an 893-patient internal cohort, phenotypic subtype independently associated with DFS (p = 0.025) and this was attenuated in stage III patients (p = 0.020). Phenotypic subtype also independently associated with RR (p < 0.001) in these patients. In a 146-patient external cohort, phenotypic subtype independently stratified patients by DFS (p = 0.028), validating their prognostic value. In 1343 SCOT trial patients, the effect of treatment type significantly depended on phenotypic subtype (pinteraction = 0.011). Phenotypic subtype independently associated with DFS in stage III patients receiving FOLFOX (p = 0.028). Furthermore, the immune subtype significantly associated with better response to FOLFOX compared to CAPOX adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III patients (p = 0.013). In conclusion, histological phenotypic subtypes are an effective prognostic classification in patients with stage III CRC that associates with risk of recurrence and response to FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Compuestos Organoplatinos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Organoplatinos/uso terapéutico , Fenotipo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Increased interest in, and demand for, music therapy provision for persons with dementia prompted this study's exploration of music therapists' strategies for creating musical communities in dementia care settings, considering the needs and resources of people affected by dementia. Focus group discussions and detailed iterative study of improvisational music therapy work by six experienced practitioners clarify the contextual immediacy and socio-musical complexities of music therapy in dementia care homes. Music therapy's 'ripple effect', with resonances from micro (person-to-person musicking), to meso (musicking beyond 'session time') and macro level (within the care home and beyond), implies that all who are part of the dementia care ecology need opportunities for flourishing, shared participation, and for expanded self-identities; beyond 'staff', 'residents', or 'being in distress'. On such basis, managers and funders might consider an extended brief for music therapists' roles, to include generating and maintaining musical wellbeing throughout residential care settings.
Asunto(s)
Demencia/terapia , Musicoterapia/métodos , Comunicación , Grupos Focales , Hogares para Ancianos , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prospective studies are needed to assess the maternal and fetal hazards of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in pregnancy. AIMS: To make the Australian Register of AEDs in Pregnancy better known to the Australian obstetric community by presenting results derived from it. METHODS: Analysis of data collected by the Register between 1999 and December 2006. RESULTS: The Register contained data on 1002 epileptic or AED-treated pregnancies, 992 with known outcomes, 83 not exposed to AEDs in at least their first trimester, and 30 prescribed AEDs for indications other than epilepsy. Statistically significant findings included more frequent folate supplementation and decreased alcohol intake during pregnancy in women with epilepsy; a dose-related increased risk of fetal malformation associated with valproate therapy; a tendency towards lower birthweights in live-born malformed offspring; and a substantially reduced decreased risk of seizures in pregnancy with one year seizure freedom before pregnancy. The small numbers of patients may have prevented other differences from reaching a P<0.05 value. CONCLUSIONS: The Register has already produced important information for the management of pregnant women with epilepsy in Australia, but greater rates of recruitment into the Register are desirable to allow it to achieve its full potential.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Australia , Peso al Nacer , Femenino , Feto/anomalías , Humanos , Embarazo , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most women with epilepsy need to take antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in pregnancy to prevent the potentially harmful effects of seizures. Retrospective studies have demonstrated an increased chance of having a child with a birth defect (BD) in women with epilepsy taking AEDs. It is uncertain how much of this risk is directly caused by the AEDs and whether certain drugs or combinations are associated with a greater risk. AIMS: To establish a register to evaluate prospectively the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to specific AEDs; to determine whether certain AEDs or combinations were associated with a greater risk; and to determine whether other factors influenced the risk. METHODS: An Australia-wide, prospective, voluntary, telephone-interview based, observational register. Three groups of pregnant women were enrolled: those with epilepsy taking AEDs, those with epilepsy not taking AEDs, and those taking AEDs for a non-epileptic indication. The pregnancy outcomes were evaluated by follow-up interviews and by reference to hospital and treating doctors' records. RESULTS: Over the first 30 months of the study (till December 2001) 334 eligible women were enrolled, with all states and territories being represented. Two hundred and ninety two pregnancies had been completed, of which 256 (88%) resulted in a healthy live birth, 19 (6.5%) a live birth with a birth defect, four an induced abortion because of a detected malformation on ultrasound, one premature labour with a stillbirth and 12 (4%) spontaneous abortions. Of the completed pregnancies, 269 were exposed to at least one AED during the first trimester. The incidence of birth defects in relation to specific AEDs was: valproate (16.7%), phenytoin (10.5%), lamotrigine (7.7%) and carbamazepine (3.3%), none of which was significantly different from that in women with epilepsy not taking an AED (4.3%, n.s.). The dose of valproate taken was higher in pregnancies with BD compared to those without (mean 2081 mg vs. 1149 mg, p<0.0001). The incidence of folate supplementation being taken prior to conception did not differ for pregnancy outcomes with or without BD (70% vs. 66%, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The model for the Australian Pregnancy Register appears to be successful, with strong enrolment from all regions over the first 30 months. The study is prospective and includes reference to all new AEDs approved in Australia over the past decade. Analysis of the pregnancy outcomes to date may reveal early trends, but numbers are still to small for any definitive conclusions to be made regarding the relative risk in pregnancy of individual AEDs.