Head skeleton malformations in zebrafish (Danio rerio) to assess adverse effects of mixtures of compounds.

The EU-EuroMix project adopted the strategy of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for cumulative risk assessment, which limits the number of chemicals to consider in a mixture to those that induce a specific toxicological phenotype. These so-called cumulative assessment groups (CAGs) are refined at several levels, including the target organ and specific phenotype. Here, we explore the zebrafish embryo as a test model for quantitative evaluation in one such CAG, skeletal malformations, through exposure to test compounds 0-120 hpf and alcian blue cartilage staining at 120 hpf, focusing on the head skeleton. Reference compounds cyproconazole, flusilazole, metam, and thiram induced distinctive phenotypes in the head skeleton between the triazoles and dithiocarbamates. Of many evaluated parameters, the Meckel's-palatoquadrate (M-PQ) angle was selected for further assessment, based on the best combination of a small confidence interval, an intermediate maximal effect size and a gentle slope of the dose-response curve with cyproconazole and metam. Additional test compounds included in the CAG skeletal malformations database were tested for M-PQ effects, and this set was supplemented with compounds associated with craniofacial malformations or cleft palate to accommodate otherwise organized databases. This additional set included hexaconazole, all-trans-retinoic acid, AM580, CD3254, maneb, pyrimethanil, imidacloprid, pirimiphos-methyl, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 5-fluorouracil, 17alpha-ethynylestradiol (EE2), ethanol, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), PCB 126, methylmercury, boric acid, and MEHP. Most of these compounds produced a dose-response for M-PQ effects. Application of the assay in mixture testing was provided by combined exposure to cyproconazole and TCDD through the isobole method, supporting that in this case the combined effect can be modeled through concentration addition.

Sub-chronic toxicity study in rats orally exposed to nanostructured silica.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic Amorphous Silica (SAS) is commonly used in food and drugs. Recently, a consumer intake of silica from food was estimated at 9.4 mg/kg bw/day, of which 1.8 mg/kg bw/day was estimated to be in the nano-size range. Food products containing SAS have been shown to contain silica in the nanometer size range (i.e. 5-200 nm) up to 43% of the total silica content. Concerns have been raised about the possible adverse effects of chronic exposure to nanostructured silica. METHODS: Rats were orally exposed to 100, 1000 or 2500 mg/kg bw/day of SAS, or to 100, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day of NM-202 (a representative nanostructured silica for OECD testing) for 28 days, or to the highest dose of SAS or NM-202 for 84 days. RESULTS: SAS and NM-202 were extensively characterized as pristine materials, but also in the feed matrix and gut content of the animals, and after in vitro digestion. The latter indicated that the intestinal content of the mid/high-dose groups had stronger gel-like properties than the low-dose groups, implying low gelation and high bioaccessibility of silica in the human intestine at realistic consumer exposure levels. Exposure to SAS or NM-202 did not result in clearly elevated tissue silica levels after 28-days of exposure. However, after 84-days of exposure to SAS, but not to NM-202, silica accumulated in the spleen. Biochemical and immunological markers in blood and isolated cells did not indicate toxicity, but histopathological analysis, showed an increased incidence of liver fibrosis after 84-days of exposure, which only reached significance in the NM-202 treated animals. This observation was accompanied by a moderate, but significant increase in the expression of fibrosis-related genes in liver samples. CONCLUSIONS: Although only few adverse effects were observed, additional studies are warranted to further evaluate the biological relevance of observed fibrosis in liver and possible accumulation of silica in the spleen in the NM-202 and SAS exposed animals respectively. In these studies, dose-effect relations should be studied at lower dosages, more representative of the current exposure of consumers, since only the highest dosages were used for the present 84-day exposure study.