RESUMEN
Objective: The purpose of this pilot study is to explore the difference in safety and effectiveness after stenting in patients with extracranial or intracranial vertebral artery stenosis. Methods: The study involved 26 patients treated with stents for ≥70% stenosis between January 1, 2017, and September 8, 2020. The patients were divided into intracranial and extracranial groups based on the location of the target vessel stenosis. The incidence of stroke or death within 30 days, long-term recurrence of ischemic symptoms, and restenosis during follow-up were monitored. Results: Within 30 days, no stroke or death was observed in the 26 patients, During the follow-up period, the risk of recurrence of posterior circulation stroke or transient ischemic attack was 23.1% (6/26). Vascular-related complications were 5.6% vs. 12.5% (P = .529) in the intracranial vs. extracranial stenosis group. After 1 year, stroke or transient ischemic attack of posterior circulation was observed in 12.5% (1/8) vs. 16.7% (3/18) in the intracranial and extracranial stenosis group, respectively. The restenosis rate in the intracranial stenosis group was higher than the extracranial stenosis group (37.5% vs. 28.6%, P > .05). This trend was also found in the asymptomatic restenosis rate (25% vs. 7.1%, P = .527). Conclusions: The study results showed that there was no significant difference in the safety and effectiveness after stenting in extracranial and intracranial vertebral artery stenosis, but intracranial vertebral artery stenosis has a low rate of symptomatic restenosis. Symptomatic restenosis may be an important problem that limits the efficacy of extracranial vertebral artery stenting.