Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Multicomponent Therapy in Patients With Fibromyalgia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic painful condition partly due to alterations in pain modulation by the central nervous system. Multicomponent therapy (MT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) have both been reported as pain modulators in patients with FM. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of rTMS on pain with a combination of MT and rTMS versus MT alone. METHODS: Thirty-nine FM patients with visual analog scale (VAS) results for pain of ≥40 mm were randomized to active or sham rTMS (high-frequency, primary motor cortex M1) plus 12 weeks of MT (3 sessions per week combining aerobic training, pool-based exercises, and relaxation). Repetitive TMS was started 2 weeks prior to MT and maintained until the end of the program (week 14). Assessments were achieved at baseline, at week 14, and at 6 months (week 40) after completion of the program. The main criterion was pain reduction, as assessed by the weekly mean self-reported level of pain (reported daily). Secondary outcomes were cardiorespiratory fitness (graded maximal exercise test), cardiac autonomic adaptations, and FM impact (using scales for FM impact, depression, sleep efficiency, and pain catastrophizing). RESULTS: The reduction of the weekly mean of pain reported daily did not differ significantly between groups (using repeated measures of analysis of variance [ANOVA]). Two-way ANOVAs showed that pain VAS results, as well as cardiorespiratory fitness, quality of life, depression, and catastrophizing, improved significantly at week 14 and remained stable until week 40. Neither cardiac autonomic adaptations nor sleep efficiency changed significantly. CONCLUSION: Repetitive TMS did not reduce pain in patients with FM who followed the MT program.

Increased body iron stores in elite road cyclists.

BACKGROUND: One third of French elite road cyclists were found to have hyperferritinemia on antidoping control tests performed during the Tour de France in 1998. PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to determine whether hyperferritinemia corresponded to elevated body iron stores or not and, affirmatively, what were its mechanism, its clinical consequences, and its spontaneous course. METHODS: 83 elite road male cyclists presenting with hyperferritinemia, defined as serum ferritin level greater than 300 microg.L-1, were studied with respect to consumption of iron and other drugs, serum iron tests, HFE mutations, and hepatic iron concentration (HIC; N < 35 micromol.g-1 dry weight). RESULTS: All cyclists were asymptomatic and had normal physical and cardiac examination. Their median (range) serum ferritin, serum iron, and transferrin saturation levels were 504 microg.L-1 (306-1671), 20 micromol.L-1 (8.5-36.3), and 39% (20-76), respectively. HIC was increased in 24/27 up to 187 micromol.g-1. Allelic frequency of the H63D mutation was increased in cyclists when compared to controls (P = 0.04). However, iron tests did not differ according to HFE genotypes. Most cyclists (89%) had been supplemented with iron. The median iron supplementation was 25.5 g (range: 1.4-336) and correlated well (P = 0.002) with serum ferritin. Evolution of serum ferritin levels did not differ whether cyclists had been continuing iron supplementation or not. CONCLUSION: Hyperferritinemia in elite road cyclists accounted for increased body iron stores caused by and persisting after cessation of excessive iron supplementation. Even when mild, iron excess may expose to long-term complications and should be removed, at least at the time when professional cyclists retire. To prevent iatrogenic iron overload, supplementation with iron must be done according to serum ferritin follow-up and not either blindly or on the basis of serum iron determination only.