Revisiting Forel Field Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Lesioning the Forel field or the subthalamic region is considered a possible treatment for tremoric patients with Parkinson disease, essential tremor, and other diseases. This surgical treatment was performed in the 1960s to 1970s and was an alternative to thalamotomy. Recently, there has been increasing interest in the reappraisal of stimulating and/or lesioning these targets, partly as a result of innovations in imaging and noninvasive ablative technologies, such as magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography. OBJECTIVE: We wanted to perform a thorough review of the subthalamic region, both from an anatomic and a surgical standpoint, to offer a comprehensive and updated analysis of the techniques and results reported for patients with tremor treated with different techniques. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature, gathering articles that included patients who underwent ablative or stimulation surgical techniques, targeting the pallidothalamic pathways (pallidothalamic tractotomy), cerebellothalamic pathway (cerebellothalamic tractotomy), or subthalamic area. RESULTS: Pallidothalamic tractotomy consists of a reduced area that includes pallidofugal pathways. It may be considered an interesting target, given the benefit/risk ratio and the clinical effect, which, compared with pallidotomy, involves a lower risk of injury or involvement of vital structures such as the internal capsule or optic tract. Cerebellothalamic tractotomy and/or posterior subthalamic area are other alternative targets to thalamic stimulation or ablative surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the significant breakthrough that magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasonography has meant in the neurosurgical world, some classic targets such as the pallidothalamic tract, Forel field, and posterior subthalamic area may be reconsidered as surgical alternatives for patients with movement disorders.

Sedation During Surgery for Movement Disorders and Perioperative Neurologic Complications: An Observational Study Comparing Local Anesthesia, Remifentanil, and Dexmedetomidine.

BACKGROUND: The anesthetic management of patients requiring surgery for movement disorders needs to balance microrecording quality and patient cooperation with safety and comfort. Anesthetics can alter microrecording, although the effect on outcome is debatable. They also provide a rested and cooperative patient and minimize complications such as intracranial hemorrhage by providing better hemodynamic control. Most teams use local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care or conscious sedation with propofol. Recently, dexmedetomidine has emerged as an alternative that, at low doses, does not affect microrecording, and that does not impair respiratory drive. METHODS: In the past 15 years, we have used in our institution local anesthesia, remifentanil, or dexmedetomidine sedation. We compared functional outcome and rate of complications in a group of 145 patients with similar characteristics. RESULTS: We found 5 (3.4%) intracranial hemorrhages. Two (1.4%) were symptomatic. The remifentanil group had the highest risk of having systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg during surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-9.9), whereas the dexmedetomidine group had the lowest (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.2-1.8), compared with the local anesthesia group. Surgical time was shortest with dexmedetomidine (mean, 283 minutes) and longest with local anesthesia only (mean, 328 minutes). Functional outcome (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III motor component scale) was similar among groups. The dexmedetomidine group had a statistically significant lower risk of perioperative neurologic events compared with the local anesthesia group (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.002-0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Sedation can be used safely without affecting outcome, and dexmedetomidine provides better hemodynamic management. Clinical significance remains unclear and larger studies need to be undertaken.

Deep brain stimulation: from neurology to psychiatry?

Functional stereotaxy was introduced in the late 1940s to reduce the morbidity of lobotomy in psychiatric disease by using more focal lesions. The advent of neuroleptics led to a drastic decline in psychosurgery for several decades. Functional stereotactic neurosurgery has recently been revitalized, starting with treatment of Parkinson's disease, in which deep brain stimulation (DBS) facilitates reversible focal neuromodulation of altered basal ganglia circuits. DBS is now being extended to treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions such as Gilles de la Tourette syndrome, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression and addiction. In this review, we discuss the concept that dysfunction of motor, limbic and associative cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops underlies these various disorders, which might now be amenable to DBS treatment.

Successful thalamic deep brain stimulation for orthostatic tremor.

We report a patient with severe orthostatic tremor (OT) unresponsive to pharmacological treatments that was successfully controlled with thalamic (Vim, ventralis intermedius nucleus) deep brain stimulation (DBS) over a 4-year period. Cortical activity associated with the OT revealed by EEG back-averaging and fluoro-deoxi-glucose PET were also suppressed in parallel with tremor arrest. This case suggests that Vim-DBS may be a useful therapeutic approach for patients highly disabled by OT.

Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease

Summary. At present there are major surgical approaches to Parkinson's disease (PD): (1). Ablative surgery (i.e. pallidotomy, thalamotomy); (2) deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus, internal globus pallidus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN); and (3) grafting fetal mesencephalic cells into the striatum. The aim of pallidotomy and DBS is to reduce the excessive inhibitory output from the GPi and substantia nigra reticulata (SNr). Pallidotomy and DBS of the STN or GPi aim to reverse the pathophysiological consequences of dopamine deficiency in PD, and should be considered entirely symptomatic treatments. The ideal candidates for pallidotomy are young patients in good general health in whom dyskinesias are the main reasons for disability. Patients with severe bilateral problems uncontrollable with present pharmacological tools are candidates for DBS. Grafting aims to repair the nigrostriatal pathway and restore dopaminergic function in the striatum. In the future implants containing not only dopaminergic cells but also growth factors and a variety of other substances could become a method to not only functionally compensate the biochemical abnormalities of PD but also to arrest its progression. At present, grafting of dopaminergic cells is perhaps best suited for patients with young-onset PD (less than 45 years old) who are at high risk of developing complications within a short time of begining pharmacological treatment and in whom the idea of making lesions or implanting electrodes into the brain for decades seems less appealing. Consideration of surgery in any given patient should be weighed against the risks (about 1 per cent mortality and 2-6 per cent of severe morbidity-hemiplegia, cognitive deficit, speech problems, etc.) associated with these techniques. The development of better imaging methods and the growing expertise of multidisciplinary teams will undoubtedly make surgery for PD safer and more effective in the future(AU)