The analgesic effect of electroencephalographic neurofeedback for people with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Electroencephalographic (EEG) neurofeedback has been utilized to regulate abnormal brain activity associated with chronic pain. METHODS: In this systematic review, we synthesized the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of EEG neurofeedback on chronic pain using random effects meta-analyses. Additionally, we performed a narrative review to explore the results of non-randomized studies. The quality of included studies was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tools, and the GRADE system was used to rate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Ten RCTs and 13 non-randomized studies were included. The primary meta-analysis on nine eligible RCTs indicated that although there is low confidence, EEG neurofeedback may have a clinically meaningful effect on pain intensity in short-term. Removing the studies with high risk of bias from the primary meta-analysis resulted in moderate confidence that there remained a clinically meaningful effect on pain intensity. We could not draw any conclusion from the findings of non-randomized studies, as they were mostly non-comparative trials or explorative case series. However, the extracted data indicated that the neurofeedback protocols in both RCTs and non-randomized studies mainly involved the conventional EEG neurofeedback approach, which targeted reinforcing either alpha or sensorimotor rhythms and suppressing theta and/or beta bands on one brain region at a time. A posthoc analysis of RCTs utilizing the conventional approach resulted in a clinically meaningful effect estimate for pain intensity. CONCLUSION: Although there is promising evidence on the analgesic effect of EEG neurofeedback, further studies with larger sample sizes and higher quality of evidence are required.

The mediating effect of pain catastrophizing on pain intensity: The influence of the timing of assessments.

BACKGROUND: Pain catastrophizing underpins several psychosocial theories of pain, but there is limited evidence to support the proposal that changes in pain catastrophizing cause changes in pain. Results from mediation analyses have conflicting results, and one reason for these might be the timing of the assessment of pain catastrophizing. This study aimed to test the effect of the timing of the assessment of pain catastrophizing on its mediating role on pain intensity. METHODS: Causal mediation analysis using data from a randomized controlled trial which included 100 participants with chronic low back pain. The trial found that clinical hypnosis, compared to pain education, reduced worst pain intensity and pain catastrophizing. In model 1, we used data from 2-week follow-up for pain catastrophizing and 3-month follow-up for pain. In model 2, we used data from 3-month follow-up for both pain catastrophizing and pain. RESULTS: The intervention had a significant average total effect on pain (-1.34 points, 95% CI -2.50 to -0.13). The average causal mediation effect was significant when pain catastrophizing, and pain were measured at the same time (-0.62 points, 95% CI -1.30 to -0.11) but not significant when pain catastrophizing and pain intensity were measured at different times (-0.10 points, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The timing of the assessment influenced the mediating role of pain catastrophizing on pain intensity. These results raise questions on the casual role that pain catastrophizing has on pain intensity. Psychosocial interventions such as clinical hypnosis can reduce pain intensity even when there has been no change in pain catastrophizing.

Subtle alterations in brain anatomy may change an individual's personality in chronic pain.

It is well established that gross prefrontal cortex damage can affect an individual's personality. It is also possible that subtle prefrontal cortex changes associated with conditions such as chronic pain, and not detectable until recent advances in human brain imaging, may also result in subtle changes in an individual's personality. In an animal model of chronic neuropathic pain, subtle prefrontal cortex changes including altered basal dendritic length, resulted in altered decision making ability. Using multiple magnetic resonance imaging techniques, we found in humans, although gray matter volume and on-going activity were unaltered, chronic neuropathic pain was associated with reduced free and bound proton movement, indicators of subtle anatomical changes, in the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex and mediodorsal thalamus. Furthermore, proton spectroscopy revealed an increase in neural integrity in the medial prefrontal cortex in neuropathic pain patients, the degree of which was significantly correlated to the personality temperament of novelty seeking. These data reveal that even subtle changes in prefrontal cortex anatomy may result in a significant change in an individual's personality.

Different pain, different brain: thalamic anatomy in neuropathic and non-neuropathic chronic pain syndromes.

Trigeminal neuropathic pain (TNP) and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are thought to have fundamentally different etiologies. It has been proposed that TNP arises through damage to, or pressure on, somatosensory afferents in the trigeminal nerve, whereas TMD results primarily from peripheral nociceptor activation. Because some reports suggest that neuropathic pain is associated with changes in brain anatomy, it is possible that TNP is maintained by changes in higher brain structures, whereas TMD is not. The aim of this investigation is to determine whether changes in regional brain anatomy and biochemistry occur in both conditions. Twenty-one TNP subjects, 20 TMD subjects, and 36 healthy controls were recruited. Voxel-based morphometry of T1-weighted anatomical images revealed no significant regional gray matter volume change in TMD patients. In contrast, gray matter volume of TNP patients was reduced in the primary somatosensory cortex, anterior insula, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and the thalamus, whereas gray matter volume was increased in the posterior insula. The thalamic volume decrease was only seen in the TNP patients classified as having trigeminal neuropathy but not those with trigeminal neuralgia. Furthermore, in trigeminal neuropathy patients, magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed a significant reduction in the N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio, a biochemical marker of neural viability, in the region of thalamic volume loss. The data suggest that the pathogenesis underlying neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain conditions are fundamentally different and that neuropathic pain conditions that result from peripheral injuries may be generated and/or maintained by structural changes in regions such as the thalamus.

Brain circuitry underlying pain in response to imagined movement in people with spinal cord injury.

Pain following injury to the nervous system is characterized by changes in sensory processing including pain. Although there are many studies describing pain evoked by peripheral stimulation, we have recently reported that pain can be evoked in subjects with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) during a motor imagery task. In this study, we have used functional magnetic resonance imaging to explore brain sites underlying the expression of this phenomenon. In 9 out of 11 subjects with complete thoracic SCI and below-level neuropathic pain, imagined foot movements either evoked pain in a previously non-painful region or evoked a significant increase in pain within the region of on-going pain (3.2+/-0.7-5.2+/-0.8). In both controls (n=19) and SCI subjects, movement imagery evoked signal increases in the supplementary motor area and cerebellar cortex. In SCI subjects, movement imagery also evoked increases in the left primary motor cortex (MI) and the right superior cerebellar cortex. In addition, in the SCI subjects, the magnitude of activation in the perigenual anterior cingulate cortex and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was significantly correlated with absolute increases in pain intensity. These regions expanded to include right and left anterior insula, supplementary motor area and right premotor cortex when percentage change in pain intensity was examined. This study demonstrates that in SCI subjects with neuropathic pain, a cognitive task is able to activate brain circuits involved in pain processing independently of peripheral inputs.

Movement imagery increases pain in people with neuropathic pain following complete thoracic spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in deafferentation and the onset of neuropathic pain in a substantial proportion of people. Based on evidence suggesting motor cortex activation results in attenuation of neuropathic pain, we sought to determine whether neuropathic SCI pain could be modified by imagined movements of the foot. Fifteen subjects with a complete thoracic SCI (7 with below-level neuropathic pain and 8 without pain) were instructed in the use of movement imagery. Movement imagery was practiced three times daily for 7days. On the eighth day, subjects performed the movement imagery in the laboratory and recorded pain ratings during the period of imagined movement. Six out of 7 subjects with neuropathic pain reported an increase in pain during imagined movements from 2.9+/-0.7 during baseline to 5.0+/-1.0 during movement imagery (p<0.01). In SCI subjects without neuropathic pain, movement imagery evoked an increase in non-painful sensation intensity from a baseline of 1.9+/-0.7 to 4.8+/-1.3 during the movement imagery (p<0.01). Two subjects without a history of pain or non-painful phantom sensations had onset of dysesthesia while performing imagined movements. This study reports exacerbation of pain in response to imagined movements and it contrasts with reports of pain reduction in people with peripheral neuropathic pain. The potential mechanisms underlying this sensory enhancement with movement imagery are discussed.