Evaluation of chloroplast genome annotation tools and application to analysis of the evolution of coffee species.

Chloroplast sequences are widely used for phylogenetic analysis due to their high degree of conservation in plants. Whole chloroplast genomes can now be readily obtained for plant species using new sequencing methods, giving invaluable data for plant evolution However new annotation methods are required for the efficient analysis of this data to deliver high quality phylogenetic analyses. In this study, the two main tools for chloroplast genome annotation were compared. More consistent detection and annotation of genes were produced with GeSeq when compared to the currently used Dogma. This suggests that the annotation of most of the previously annotated chloroplast genomes should now be updated. GeSeq was applied to species related to coffee, including 16 species of the Coffea and Psilanthus genera to reconstruct the ancestral chloroplast genomes and to evaluate their phylogenetic relationships. Eight genes in the plant chloroplast pan genome (consisting of 92 genes) were always absent in the coffee species analyzed. Notably, the two main cultivated coffee species (i.e. Arabica and Robusta) did not group into the same clade and differ in their pattern of gene evolution. While Arabica coffee (Coffea arabica) belongs to the Coffea genus, Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) is associated with the Psilanthus genus. A more extensive survey of related species is required to determine if this is a unique attribute of Robusta coffee or a more widespread feature of coffee tree species.

Wastewater treatment plants release large amounts of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli into the environment.

BACKGROUND: The determinants of the spread of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBLEC) in the community remain unclear. To evaluate its dissemination in the environment, we analyzed the ESBLEC population throughout an urban wastewater network. METHODS: Samples were collected weekly, over a 10-week period, from 11 sites throughout the wastewater network of Besançon city (France). Total E. coli and ESBLEC loads were determined for each sample. As a control, we analyzed 51 clinical ESBLEC isolates collected at our hospital. We genotyped both environmental and clinical ESBLEC by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing and identified their blaESBL genes by sequencing. RESULTS: The E. coli load was higher in urban wastewater than in hospital wastewater (7.5 × 10(5) vs 3.5 × 10(5) CFU/mL, respectively). ESBLEC was recovered from almost all the environmental samples and accounted for 0.3% of total E. coli in the untreated water upstream from the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The ESBLEC load was higher in hospital wastewater than in community wastewater (27 × 10(3) vs 0.8 × 10(3) CFU/mL, respectively). Treatment by the WWTP eliminated 98% and 94% of total E. coli and ESBLEC, respectively. The genotyping revealed considerable diversity within both environmental and clinical ESBLEC and the overrepresentation of some clonal complexes. Most of the sequence types displayed by the clinical isolates were also found in the environment. CTX-M enzymes were the most common enzymes whatever the origin of the isolates. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment at the WWTP led to the relative enrichment of ESBLEC. We estimated that >600 billion of ESBLEC are released into the river Doubs daily and the sludge produced by the WWTP, used as fertilizer, contains 2.6 × 10(5) ESBLEC per gram.