Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 156: 111202, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32510422

RESUMEN

This study investigated the sensitivity of two deepsea species using mortality of northern shrimp (Pandalus borealis) and polyp activity of stony coral (Lophelia pertusa) to dispersant, Corexit 9500 and aromatic hydrocarbons (toluene, 2-methylnaphthalene, phenanthrene) in 96-h tests. Resulting hydrocarbon toxicity data were fit to the Target Lipid Model to generate predictive models and determine species sensitivity. Toxicity of chemically enhanced water accommodated fractions of Alaskan North Slope crude oil (ANS-oil) was also investigated with shrimp using nominal loading, total petroleum hydrocarbons and biomimetic extraction (BE) as oil exposure metrics. Coral were more sensitive to dispersant than shrimp while similar sensitivity was observed for hydrocarbons. Study and literature findings indicate deepsea species exhibit acute sensitivities to dispersant, hydrocarbons and oil that are comparable to pelagic species. Results support use of passive sampling methods to quantify dissolved oil for interpreting oil toxicity tests and suggest models for predicting time-dependence of toxicity warrant re-evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Antozoos , Pandalidae , Contaminación por Petróleo , Petróleo , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua , Animales
2.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 27(25): 30927-30932, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31676941

RESUMEN

In recent years, EU countries have recognized national policies to authorize dispersant use to mitigate the petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in case of unintentional oil spills at sea. A harmonization of dispersant approval procedures is needed because the application of different methodologies agrees on dissimilar toxic responses for the same dispersant in different European countries. Actually, different dispersant approval procedures are applied in France and Italy with one French mandatory toxicity test and three Italian bioassays accompanied with different criteria of toxicity classification. In this paper, a harmonized tiered approach is proposed to address the dispersant ecotoxicological assessment in these two nations. Our approach, applicable at the European level, introduces two mandatory tests (algal growth inhibition test and mortality test with crustaceans) and one discretionary test (fish mortality test), by reducing use of vertebrates as much as possible in accordance with humane principles and animal welfare.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación por Petróleo , Petróleo , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/análisis , Animales , Europa (Continente) , Francia , Italia , Tensoactivos
3.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 143: 180-185, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28550804

RESUMEN

A research project has been performed to the request of the RAMOGE Executive Secretariat to identify differences between dispersant approval procedures in France and Italy and propose ways to harmonize them. A collaborative study has been conducted by CEDRE (Centre of Documentation, Research and Experimentation on Accidental Water Pollution) and ISPRA (Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research) to: a) compare current approval procedures in Italy and France with identification of differences and commonalities; b) carry out toxicity tests using both procedures on two selected dispersants; c) propose a common approach between Italy and France. The results showed that, because of the differences in ecotoxicological tests and in the evaluation criteria used, the outcomes on the same products could be different in Italy and in France. Both tested dispersants met the French requirements for approval (LC50 ≥ 10 times reference toxicant), while only one dispersant met the Italian approval criterion (EC50 > 10mg/L). A possible way of harmonizing the approval procedures could be to increase the number of test organisms in the French procedure, which currently only uses one crustacean species. Furthermore, a common criterion for toxicity assessment should be discussed and agreed.


Asunto(s)
Petróleo , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Animales , Crustáceos/efectos de los fármacos , Diatomeas/efectos de los fármacos , Diatomeas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Peces , Francia , Italia , Pruebas de Toxicidad
4.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 74(8): 2167-74, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21835465

RESUMEN

The effects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) resulting from a water soluble fraction (WSF) of an Arabian crude oil were tested in vivo on the bioconcentration in muscles and on immune parameters in sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. After 15 days of acclimation, fish were acutely exposed (48 h) to the WSF of 25 g of oil, and then returned to clean sea water for a 15 day recovery period. PAH concentration in the WSF at the beginning of the exposure was estimated to 773±187 ng L⁻¹ similar to that observed in the marine environment after an oil spill. The WSF in the experimental system was composed by lightest PAH compounds and did not remain constant during the two days of exposure. Just after exposure to the WSF, a total mean concentration of 148±46 µg kg⁻¹ of PAHs was found in contaminated fish muscle, composed of parent and alkylated naphthalene compounds (86.5%), benzo[a]pyrene (10.1%) and benzo[b+k]fluoranthene (3.4%). In addition, a decrease of leucocytes counts due to a lymphopenia and granulopenia and an increase of the haemolytic activity of the alternative pathway (ACH50) were noted. After a 15 day recovery period, haematocrit was decreased whereas effects on the blood granulocytes of fish seemed to be reversible, contrary to the specific immune system and quality of flesh. In fact, contaminated fish had still less lymphocyte cells compared to controls fish and their flesh were still contaminated by naphthalene and benzo[a]pyrene creating a risk for human consumers.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación por Petróleo/efectos adversos , Petróleo/toxicidad , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/toxicidad , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Animales , Lubina/inmunología , Lubina/metabolismo , Benzo(a)pireno/metabolismo , Benzo(a)pireno/toxicidad , Humanos , Músculos/metabolismo , Naftalenos/metabolismo , Naftalenos/toxicidad , Petróleo/metabolismo , Hidrocarburos Policíclicos Aromáticos/metabolismo , Agua de Mar/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA