RESUMEN
Specific immunotherapy is the only current treatment that may modify the disease process in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Recent studies have evidenced that sublingual administration of grass extract tablets is an efficacious, safe and convenient form of specific immunotherapy in children with grass pollen induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. It is recommended that daily treatment is initiated four months before the pollen season begins and continued through three years, though paediatric studies of long-term and potential asthma and allergy prevention effects are still awaited.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Administración Sublingual , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Alérgenos/farmacología , Niño , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Extractos Vegetales/inmunología , Extractos Vegetales/farmacología , Poaceae/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Comprimidos , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/etiología , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a la Leche/dietoterapia , Evaluación Nutricional , Calcio de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Niño , Desarrollo Infantil , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/prevención & control , Preescolar , Registros de Dieta , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Lactante , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Lactante/prevención & control , Sustitutos de la Leche/administración & dosificación , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: The use of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) is increasing. The aim was to characterise the use of CAM among patients in a paediatric department. All patients (aged 0-18 years), out-patients or hospitalised, in contact with the Department of Paediatrics, Odense University Hospital during a 2 week period in the autumn of 2001 were asked to participate. In total, 622 (92%) patients participated. The data were collected in an interviewer administered questionnaire during a short structured interview with the patient and parents. CAM was divided into herbal medicine (herbal drugs or dietary supplements) (HM), alternative therapy (AT) (i.e. acupuncture) or chiropractic (CHI). Of all patients, 53% had tried CAM at least once and 23% had tried CAM within the last month (15% HM, 7% AT and 2% CHI). There was no correlation between use of CAM and gender, age or if the patient was out-patient or hospitalised. The users were pre-school children. HM (Bio-Strath and Echinacea) was especially used to strengthen the immune system. Among AT, reflexological treatment was the most popular treatment. The most frequent users of CAM were patients with asthma, eczema or allergy plus patients suffering from gastrointestinal diseases or hospitalised for observation. More than 50% of the users experienced positive effects and 6% had side-effects from AM. Of the CAM users, 11% or 2% of the total paediatric population used CAM instead of conventional medicines. CONCLUSION: Of the paediatric patients, 53% had tried complementary/alternative medicine, which was used as a supplement to conventional medicine although we did not know how long it was used. Paediatric patients should be interviewed about their use of complementary/alternative medicine with regard to side-effects, interactions or lack of compliance with conventional medicine.
Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría , Adolescente , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children with allergic rhinitis are likely to develop asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether specific immunotherapy can prevent the development of asthma and reduce bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: From 6 pediatric allergy centers, 205 children aged 6 to 14 years (mean age, 10.7 years) with grass and/or birch pollen allergy but without any other clinically important allergy were randomized either to receive specific immunotherapy for 3 years or to an open control group. All subjects had moderate to severe hay fever symptoms, but at inclusion none reported asthma with need of daily treatment. Symptomatic treatment was limited to loratadine, levocabastine, sodium cromoglycate, and nasal budesonide. Asthma was evaluated clinically and by peak flow. Methacholine bronchial provocation tests were carried out during the season(s) and during the winter. RESULTS: Before the start of immunotherapy, 20% of the children had mild asthma symptoms during the pollen season(s). Among those without asthma, the actively treated children had significantly fewer asthma symptoms after 3 years as evaluated by clinical diagnosis (odds ratio, 2.52; P <.05). Methacholine bronchial provocation test results improved significant in the active group (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy can reduce the development of asthma in children with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis.