Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 592(7853): 253-257, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33828320

RESUMEN

Modern humans appeared in Europe by at least 45,000 years ago1-5, but the extent of their interactions with Neanderthals, who disappeared by about 40,000 years ago6, and their relationship to the broader expansion of modern humans outside Africa are poorly understood. Here we present genome-wide data from three individuals dated to between 45,930 and 42,580 years ago from Bacho Kiro Cave, Bulgaria1,2. They are the earliest Late Pleistocene modern humans known to have been recovered in Europe so far, and were found in association with an Initial Upper Palaeolithic artefact assemblage. Unlike two previously studied individuals of similar ages from Romania7 and Siberia8 who did not contribute detectably to later populations, these individuals are more closely related to present-day and ancient populations in East Asia and the Americas than to later west Eurasian populations. This indicates that they belonged to a modern human migration into Europe that was not previously known from the genetic record, and provides evidence that there was at least some continuity between the earliest modern humans in Europe and later people in Eurasia. Moreover, we find that all three individuals had Neanderthal ancestors a few generations back in their family history, confirming that the first European modern humans mixed with Neanderthals and suggesting that such mixing could have been common.


Asunto(s)
ADN Antiguo/análisis , Genoma Humano/genética , Hombre de Neandertal/genética , Alelos , Américas/etnología , Animales , Arqueología , Bulgaria/etnología , Cuevas , Asia Oriental/etnología , Femenino , Historia Antigua , Humanos , Masculino , Filogenia
2.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(1)2021 01 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443177

RESUMEN

Humans reached the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific by ∼3,500 y ago, contemporaneous with or even earlier than the initial peopling of Polynesia. They crossed more than 2,000 km of open ocean to get there, whereas voyages of similar length did not occur anywhere else until more than 2,000 y later. Yet, the settlement of Polynesia has received far more attention than the settlement of the Marianas. There is uncertainty over both the origin of the first colonizers of the Marianas (with different lines of evidence suggesting variously the Philippines, Indonesia, New Guinea, or the Bismarck Archipelago) as well as what, if any, relationship they might have had with the first colonizers of Polynesia. To address these questions, we obtained ancient DNA data from two skeletons from the Ritidian Beach Cave Site in northern Guam, dating to ∼2,200 y ago. Analyses of complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences and genome-wide SNP data strongly support ancestry from the Philippines, in agreement with some interpretations of the linguistic and archaeological evidence, but in contradiction to results based on computer simulations of sea voyaging. We also find a close link between the ancient Guam skeletons and early Lapita individuals from Vanuatu and Tonga, suggesting that the Marianas and Polynesia were colonized from the same source population, and raising the possibility that the Marianas played a role in the eventual settlement of Polynesia.


Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Y/genética , ADN Antiguo/análisis , ADN Mitocondrial/genética , Migración Humana/historia , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/genética , Arqueología , Simulación por Computador , Genoma , Guam , Haplotipos , Historia Antigua , Humanos , Indonesia , Micronesia , Nueva Guinea , Filipinas , Filogenia , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Polinesia , Vanuatu
3.
Eur J Hum Genet ; 26(6): 898-911, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29483671

RESUMEN

Tai-Kadai (TK) is one of the major language families in Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA), with a concentration in the area of Thailand and Laos. Our previous study of 1234 mtDNA genome sequences supported a demic diffusion scenario in the spread of TK languages from southern China to Laos as well as northern and northeastern Thailand. Here we add an additional 560 mtDNA genomes from 22 groups, with a focus on the TK-speaking central Thai people and the Sino-Tibetan speaking Karen. We find extensive diversity, including 62 haplogroups not reported previously from this region. Demic diffusion is still a preferable scenario for central Thais, emphasizing the expansion of TK people through MSEA, although there is also some support for gene flow between central Thai and native Austroasiatic speaking Mon and Khmer. We also tested competing models concerning the genetic relationships of groups from the major MSEA languages, and found support for an ancestral relationship of TK and Austronesian-speaking groups.


Asunto(s)
Cromosomas Humanos Y/genética , ADN Mitocondrial/genética , Variación Genética/genética , Genética de Población , Asia Sudoriental , Pueblo Asiatico/genética , China , Etnicidad/genética , Haplotipos , Historia Antigua , Humanos , Lenguaje/historia , Repeticiones de Microsatélite/genética , Tailandia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA